LOG-IDEAH: LOGic trees for identification of damage due to earthquakes for architectural heritage

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 153-176

  Novelli, V I ^a   D'Ayala D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Answer set programming; Damage scenarios; Global mechanisms; Masonry historic architectural assets; Post earthquake assessment; Semantic expert system

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; DAMAGE DETECTION; EXPERT SYSTEMS; LOGIC PROGRAMMING; MASONRY MATERIALS; SEISMIC WAVES; SEMANTICS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

ANSWER SET PROGRAMMING; DAMAGE SCENARIOS; GLOBAL MECHANISMS; MASONRY HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL ASSETS; POST-EARTHQUAKE ASSESSMENT;

EARTHQUAKES;

AQUILA;

EID: 84918555718     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-014-9622-0     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. AIS (2003) Association Colombiana de Ingegneria sismica. Manual de Campo para Inspecion De Edificio Despues de un Sismo. Manizales, Colombia
2. ATC-20i (2003) Applied Technology Council, user manual: mobile post-earthquake building safety evaluation data acquisition system (version 1.0). Redwood City, California
3. ATC-20 (1989) Applied Technology Council. Procedures for post-earthquake safety evaluation of buildings. Redwood City, CA
4. Baral C (2003) Knowledge representation, reasoning, and declarative problem solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Baggio C, Bernardini A, Colozza R, Corazza L, Della Bella M, Di Pasquale G, Dolce M, Goretti A, Martinelli A (2009) Manuale per la compilazione della scheda di 1$$^\circ $$∘ livello di rilevamento danno, pronto intervento e agibilità per edifici ordinari nell’emergenza post-sismica (AeDES). Editrice Italiani nel Mondo srl - Roma
6. Barbat AH, Pujades LG, Lantada N, Moreno R (2008) Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using a capacity spectrum based method: application to Barcelona. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(10–11):851–865
7. Bernardini A, D’Ayala D, Modena C, Speranza E, Valluzzi MR (2008) Vulnerability assessment of the historical masonry building typologies of Vittorio Veneto. Special issue of Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata, vol 49, n. 3–4, Sept–Dec, pp 463–484
8. Binda L, Cardani G, Saisi A, Valluzzi MR (2006) Vulnerability analysis of the historical buildings in seismic area by a multilevel approach. Asian J Civil Eng (Building and Housing) 7(4):343–357
9. Bosiljkov V, Gostic S, Krzan M, Antolinc D, $$\check{\rm Z}$$Zˇarnic R (2009) Efficient models for the assessment of vulnerability of historical monuments in case of armed conflicts (in Slovenian). Report for CRP MIR M4-0207
10. Brain M, Cliffe O, De Vos M (2009) A pragmatic programmer’s guide to answer set programming. In: Software Engineering for answer set programming (SEA09), 2009–09-14, Potsdam
11. Cadei M, Lazzari M, Salvaneschi P (1990) Safety management of civil structures using knowledge based systems. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems—volume 2 (IEA/AIE ’90), 1990
12. Carreno ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2004) Expert system for building damage evaluation in case of earthquake. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–6 Aug 2004, paper no. 3047
13. CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: strengthening and repair of buildings, CEN-EN 1998–3
14. Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastres (CENAPRED). Norma para la Evaluación del Nivel de Daño por Sismo en Estructuras y Guía Técnica de Rehabilitación (Estructuras de Concreto Reforzado). Cuadernos de Investigación, Número 37, México, (1996)
15. Chen SY, Zheng Y, Cattani C, Wang W (2012) Modelling of biological intelligence for SCM system optimization. Comput Math Methods Med, vol 2012, Article ID 769702, p 30
16. Chitta B (2003) Knowledge representation, reasoning, and declarative problem solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003
17. Corbane C, Saito K, Dell’Ora L, Bjorgo E, Gill SPD, Piard BE, Huyck CK, Kemper T, Lemoine G, Spence RJS, Shankar R, Senegas O, Ghesquiere F, Lallemant D, Evans GB, Gartley RA, Toro J, Ghosh S, Svekla WD, Adams BJ, Eguchi RT (2011) A comprehensive analysis of building damage in the 12 January 1020 Mw7 Haiti earthquake using high-resolution satellite- and aerial imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 77(10):997–1009
18. D’Ayala D, Novelli V (2012a). Formulation of vulnerability models including the survey form to collect the data re-quired by the adopted models. Perpetuate project
19. D’Ayala D, Novelli V (2012b). Deliverable 30: freeware software with the implementation of the vulnerability models. Perpetuate project
20. D’Ayala D, Paganoni S (2011) Assessment and analysis of damage in L’Aquila historic city centre after 6th April 2009. Bull Earthq Eng 9(1):81–104
21. D’Ayala D, Novelli V (2010) Deliverable D5: abacus of the most common seismic damage. Perpetuate project
22. D’Ayala D, Speranza E (2003) Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthq Spect, vol 19, Aug, pp 479–509
23. D’Ayala D (2005) Force and displacement based vulnerability assessment for traditional buildings. Bull Earthq Eng, vol 3, Springer, pp 235–265
24. Dell’Acqua F, Bignami C, Chini M, Lisini G, Polli D Stramondo S (2011) Earthquake damages rapid mapping by satellite remote sensing data: L’Aquila April 6th, 2009 event. IEEE Journal of volume: 4, pp(s) 935–943
25. De Vent IAE, Van Hees RPJ, Hobbelman GJ (2008) Towards a systematic diagnosis of structural damage. SAHC 2008, Bath, Uk
26. D.P.C.M. 23 February (2006) (G.U. 7.3.2006, n. 55)
27. De Vos M, Kiza D, Oetsch J, Pührer J, Tompits H (2012) Answer-set programs in lana. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 2012
28. Dovers SR, Handmer JW (1995) Ignorance, the precautionary principle, and sustainability. Ambio Stockholm [AMBIO] 24(2):92–97
29. Eiter T, Leone N, Mateis C, Pfeifer G, and Scarcello F (1998) The KR system dlv: Progress report, comparisons and benchmarks. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR1998), pp 406–417. Morgan Kaufmann
30. Ferreira TM, Vicente R, da Silva JARM, Varum H, Costa A (2013) Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: case study of the old city centre in Seixal, Portugal. Bull Earthq Eng 11(5):1753–1773
31. Gebser M, Kaufmann B, Neumann A, Schaub T (2007) Conflict-driven answer set solving. In: Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI 2007). AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 2007, pp 386–392
32. Gelfond M, Lifschitz, V (1988) The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference and symposium on logic programming. MIT Press, 1070:1080
33. Gelfond M, Lifschitz V (1991) Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Gener Comput 9(3–4):365–386
34. Gomes CP, Kautz H, Sabharwal A, Selman B (2008) Satisfiability solvers. Handbook of knowledge representation 89. Chapter 2:89–134
35. Goretti A, Di Pasquale G (2002) An overview of post-earthquake damage assessment in Italy. Eeri invitational workshop. An action plan to develop earthquake damage and loss data protocols, California
36. Hancilar U, Tuzun C, Yenidogan C, Erdik M (2010) ELER software: a new tool for urban earthquake loss assessment. Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci 10:2677–2696
37. Hassanzadeha R, Nedović-Budića Z, Alavi Razavib A, Norouzzadehb M, Hodhodkianb H (2012) Interactive approach for GIS-based earthquake scenario development and resource estimation (Karmania hazard model). Comput Geosc, volume 51, February 2013, pp 324–338
38. Hiroo K (2005) Real-time seismology and earthquake damage mitigation. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 2005(33):195–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122626CopyrightcbyAnnualReviews
39. Hiroyuki M, Saburoh M, M.EERI (2006) Updating GIS building inventory data using high-resolution satellite images for earthquake damage assessment: application to Metro Manila, Philippines. Earthquake Spectra, volume 22, No 1, pp 151–168, February 2006, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
40. Hoffmann J (2007) Mapping damage during the Bam (Iran) earthquake using interferometric coherence. Int J Remote Sens 28(3):1199–1216
41. Kanamori H (2005) Real-time seismology and earthquake damage mitigation. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:195–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122626
42. Lang DH, M.EERI, Gutiérrez FVC (2010) RISe: illustrating geo-referenced data of seismic risk and loss assessment studies using Google Earth. J Earthq Spect, vol 26, no 1, 2010. doi:10.1193/1.3283906
43. Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Galasco A, CAttari S (2013) TREMURI program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Eng Struct 56:1787–1799
44. Lagomarsino S, Abbas N, Calderini C, Cattari S, Rossi M, Gianni Corradini R, Marghella G, Mattolin F, Piovanello V (2011) Classification of the cultural heritage assets and seismic damage variables for the identification of performance levels. In: Proceedings of the structural repairs and maintenance of heritage architecture conference (STREMAH). Wit Press, pp 697–708, ISSN 1743–3509
45. Li Y, Chen G, Wang B, Zheng L, Zhang Y, Tang C (2013) A new approach of combining aerial photography with satellite imagery for landslide detection. Nat Haz 66(2):649–669 March 2013
46. Melchor-Lucero O, Ferregut C (1995) Toward an expert system for damage assessment of structural concrete elements. Artif Intel Eng Des Anal Manufact 9:401–418
47. Molina S, Lang DH, Lindholm CD (2010) ELENA: an open-source tool for seismic risk and loss assessment using a logic tree computation procedure. Comput Geosci 36(2010):257–269. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2009.07.006
48. Novelli V, D’Ayala D (2011) Seismic damage identification of cultural heritage assets. Conference of seismic protection of cultural heritage. Antalya, Turkey
49. Novelli V, D’Ayala D, De Vos M, Padget J, (2012) LOG-IDEAH: ASP for Architectural Asset Preservation. In: 28th international conference on logic programming
50. Maruyama Y, Yamazaki F, Matsuzaki S, Miura H, Estrada M (2012) Evaluation of building damage and tsunami inundation based on satellite images and GIS data following the 2010 Chile earthquake. Earthq Spect 28(S1):S165–S178 June 2012
51. O.P.C.M n. 3753, Gazzetta Ufficiale, 7th April (2009), n 81 (2) (in Italian)
52. Ogawa H, Fu KS (1985) An inexact inference for damage assessment of existing structures. Int J Man Mach Stud 22:295–306
53. Papa F, Zuccaro G (2004) Medea: a multimedia and didactic handbook for seismic damage evaluation. European seismological commission XXIX general assembly. University and GFZ Potsdam, Germany
54. Parisi F, Augenti N (2013) Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks. Eng Fail Anal 34:735–760
55. Pengzhen L, Shengyong C, Yujun Z (2012) Artificial intelligence in civil engineering. Academic editor: Fei Kang, Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Mathematical problems in engineering, volume 2012, Article ID 145974, p 22. doi:10.1155/2012/145974
56. Pollino M, Fattoruso G, La Porta L, Della Rocca AB, James V (2012) Collaborative open source geospatial tools and maps supporting the response planning to disastrous earthquake events. Future Internet 4:451–468. doi:10.3390/fi4020451
57. Serra EMT, Delouis B, Emolo A, Zollo A (2013) Combining strong-motion, InSAR and GPS data to refine the fault geometry and source kinematics of the 2011, Mw 6.2, Christchurch earthquake (New Zealand). Geophys J. doi:10.1093/gji/ggt186
58. Shi Y, D’Ayala D, Prateek J, (2008) Analysis of out-of-plane damage behaviour of unreinforced masonry walls. In: 14th international brick and block masonry conference, 2008–02-17–2008–02-20, Sydney
59. Tong XH, Liu SJ (2009) Geometric processing of QuickBird stereo imageries for urban land use mapping: a case study in Shanghai, China. IEEE J Select Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 2(2):61–66
60. Turker M, Cetinkaya B (2005) Automatic detection of earthquake-damaged buildings using DEMs created from pre- and post-earthquake stereo aerial photographs. Int J Remote Sens 26(4):823–832
61. Vatan M, Görün A (2011) Pre-hazard evaluation criteria for risk assessment of masonry monumental historic structures. In: WCCE-ECCE-TCCE joint conference 2-seismic protection of cultural heritage
62. Wielanda M, Pittorea M, Parolaia S, Zschaua J, Moldobekovb B, Begalievc U (2012) Estimating building inventory for rapid seismic vulnerability assessment: Towards an integrated approach based on multi-source imaging. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, volume 36, May 2012, pp 70–83
63. Wuwongse V, Asian Inst. of Technol in Bangkok, Thailand, Anutariya C, Akama K, Nantajeewarawat E (2001) XML declarative description: a language for the semantic web intelligent systems. IEEE (volume:16, Issue: 3), pp (s): 54–65; ISSN: 1541–1672
64. Zuccaro G, Papa F (2007) Manual for earthquake damage evaluation and safety assessment. CD ROM