Coming to terms with Bloom: An online tutorial for teachers of programming fundamentals

Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series

Volumn 123, Issue , 2012, Pages 147-156

  Gluga, Richard ^a   Kay, Judy ^a   Lister, Raymond ^b   Kleitman, Sabina ^c   Lever, Tim ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assessment; Bloom; Competence; Learning progression; Maturity; Programming

Indexed keywords

BLOOMS (METAL); MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

ASSESSMENT; BLOOM; COMPETENCE; LEARNING PROGRESSIONS; MATURITY;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 85072029565     PISSN: 14451336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Anderson, W.L., Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J. and Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Allyn Bacon Longman
2. Anderson, W.L., Sosniak, A.L, Bloom, B.S. (1994). Bloom?s taxonomy: a forty-year retrospective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
3. Biggs JB & Collis KF (1982) Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York, Academic Press
4. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, Longmans, Green and Company
5. Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, University of Western Australia (2005). A Basic Guide to Writing of Student Outcome Statement. Retrieved 24 August 2011 from http://www.catl.uwa.edu.au/current_initiatives/obe/outcomes
6. Centre for Learning and Professional Development, University of Adelaide (2011). Writing learning objectives. Retrieved 24 August 2011 from http://www.adelaide.edu.au/clpd/curriculum/objectives/
7. Chi, M.T.H., Leeuw, N.D., Chiu, M.H., Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, pages 439-477. Vol. 18
8. Computer Science Curriculum 2008: An Interim Revision of CS 2001. Association for Computing Machinery and IEEE Computer Society, 2008. http://www.acm.org/education/curricula/ComputerScience2008.pdf
9. Computer Science Curriculum 2013, Association for Computing Machinery and IEEE Computer Society, http://www. sigart.org/CS2013-EAAI2011panel-RequestFor Feedback.pdf
10. Gluga, R., Kay, J., and Lever, T (2010). Modeling long term learning of generic skills. In V. Aleven, J. Kay, and J. Mostow, editors, ITS2010, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 85-94. Springer, 2010
11. Gluga, R., and Kay, J. (2009) Largescale, long-term learner models supporting flexible curriculum definition. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Scalability Issues in AIED, held in conjunction with AIED2009, pages 10-19, 2009
12. Learning and Teaching Centre, Macquarie University (2008). Writing learning outcomes. Retrieved 24 August 2011 from http://www.mq.edu.au/ltc/about_lt/assess_docs/writing_learn_out.pdf
13. Lister, R., (2000), On Blooming First Year Programming, and its Blooming Assessment. In Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2000), Melbourne, pages 158-162
14. Lister, R., (2001) Objectives and Objective Assessment in CS1. Proc. SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Charlotte NC, USA, pages 292-296, ACM Press
15. Lister, R. (2011). Concrete and Other Neo-Piagetian Forms of Reasoning in the Novice Programmer. Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2011), pages 9-14. Vol. 114
16. Morra, S., Gobbo, C., Marini, Z. and Sheese, R. (2007) Cognitive Development: Neo-Piagetian Perspectives. Psychology Press
17. Oliver, D., Dobele, T., Greber, M., and Roberts, T. 2004. This course has a Bloom Rating of 3.9. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2004), pages 227-231, Vol. 30
18. Petersen, A., Craig, M., and Zingaro, D. (2011). Reviewing CS1 Exam Question Content. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE2011), pages.631-636
19. Sheard, J., Carbone, A., Lister, R. and Simon, B. (2008), Going SOLO to assess noice programmers. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE2008), pages 209-213, Vol. 40
20. Thompson, E., Luxton-Reilly, A., Whalley, J.L., Hu, M., Robbins, P. (2008). Bloom?s Taxonomy for CS Assessment. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australasian Computing Education (ACE2008), Vol. 78
21. Whalley, J., Lister, R., Thompson, E., Clear, T., Robbins, P., Kumar, P.K.A. and Prasard, C. (2006). An Australasian Study of Reading and Comprehension Skills in Novice Programmers, using the Bloom and SOLO Taxonomies. In Proceedings of the Eighth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2006), pages 243-252, Vol. 165
22. R.Gluga, J. Kay, R.Lister, S.Kleitman, T.Lever. Over Confidence and Confusion in using Bloom for programming fundamentals assessment. Special Interest Group in Computer Science Education, 2012 (SIGCSE2012