Speech planning and prosodic phrase length

Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Krivokapic, Jelena ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGLISH SENTENCES; GLOBAL EFFECTS; PROSODIC STRUCTURE; SPEECH PLANNING; SPEECH PRODUCTION;

SPEECH;

EID: 85070025850     PISSN: 23332042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Bannert, R., Botinis, A., Gawronska, B., Katsika, A. & E. Sandblom. 2003. Discourse structure and prosodic correlates. In Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona, Spain. pp. 1229-1232.
2. Smith, C. 2004. Topic transitions and durational prosody in reading aloud: production and modeling. Speech Communication, 42, 247-270.
3. Swerts, M. & R. Geluykens. 1994. Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language and Speech, 37, 21-43.
4. Cooper, W. E. & J. Paccia-Cooper. 1980. Syntax and Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Selkirk, E. 1981. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In: T. Fretheim (Ed.), Nordic Prosody II, pp. 111-140. Trondheim: Tapir.
6. Nespor, M. & I. Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht, Holland/Riverton, USA: Foris Publications.
7. Ferreira, F. 1988. Planning and timing in sentence production: The syntax-to-phonology conversion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
8. Ferreira, F. 1991. Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. J. of Memory and Language, 30, 210-233.
9. Strangert, E. 1991. Pausing in texts read aloud. In: Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Aixen-Provence, France, Vol 4, pp. 238-241.
10. Terken, J. & R. Collier. 1992. Syntactic influences on prosody. In: Y. Tokhura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, & Y. Sagisaki.(Eds.), Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic structure, pp. 427-438. Amsterdam, Washington, Oxford: IOS Press and Tokyo, Osaka, Kyoto: Ohmsha,.
11. Strangert, E. 1997. Relating prosody to syntax: Boundary signaling in Swedish. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. pp. 239-242.
12. Watson, D. & E. Gibson. 2004. The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 6, 713-755.
13. Gee, J. P. & F. Grosjean. 1983. Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 411-458.
14. Ferreira, F. 1993. Creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review, 100, 233-253.
15. Horne, M., Strangert, E. & M. Heldner. 1995. Prosodic boundary strength in Swedish: Final lengthening and silent interval duration. In: Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, 1995. Vol. 1, pp. 170-173.
16. Krivokapic, J. 2007a. Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration. J. Phonetics, 35, 162-179.
17. Krivokapic, J. 2007b. The Planning, Production, and Perception of Prosodic Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
18. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L. & C. E. Wright. 1978. The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In: G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning, pp. 117-152. New York: Academic Press.
19. Whalen, D. H. & J. M. Kinsella-Shaw. 1997. Exploring the relationship of inspiration duration to utterance duration. Phonetica, 54, 138-152.
20. Jun, S.-A. 2003a. The effect of phrase length and speech rate on prosodic phrasing. In: Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 483-486.
21. Zvonik, E. & F. Cummins. 2003. The effect of surrounding phrase lengths on pause duration. In: Proceedings of Eurospeech 2003, Geneva, pp. 777-780. Geneva, Switzerland.
22. Kentner, G. 2007. Length, ordering preference and intonational phrasing: Evidence from pauses. Proceedings of Interspeech 2007, Antwerp.
23. Goldman Eisler, F. 1968. Psycholinguistics. Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London and New York: Academic Press.
24. Butcher, A. 1981. Aspects of the Speech Pause: Phonetic correlates and communicative functions. Kiel: Arbeitsberichte, 15. Institut fur Phonetik.
25. Fletcher, J. 1987. Some micro and macro effects of tempo change on timing in French. Linguistics, 25, 951-967.
26. Trouvain, J. & M. Grice. 1999. The effect of tempo on prosodic structure. In: Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, California, August 1-7, 1999, Vol 2, pp. 1067-1070. Martinez: East Bay Institute for Research and Education, Inc.
27. Schafer, A. J. 1997. Prosodic Parsing: The role of Prosody in Sentence Comprehension. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachussets, Amherst.
28. Carlson, K., Clifton Jr., C. & L. Frazier. 2001. Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. J. of Memory and Language, 45, 58-81.
29. Clifton Jr., C., Carlson, K. & L. Frazier. 2002. Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech, 45, 87-114.
30. Jun, S.-A. 2003b. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. J. of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 219-249.
31. Frazier, L., Clifton Jr., C. & K. Carlson. 2004. Don't break, or do: Prosodic boundary preferences. Lingua, 114, 3-27.
32. Griffin, Z. 2003. A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 603-609.
33. Cummins, F. 2002. On synchronous speech. Acoustic Research Letter Online, 3, 7-11.
34. Cummins, F. 2003. Practice and performance in speech produced synchronously. J. Phonetics, 31, 139-148.
35. Cummins, F. 2004. Synchronization among speakers reduces macroscopic temporal variability. 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 304-309.
36. Zvonik, E., & F. Cummins. 2002. Pause duration and variability in read texts. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Denver, Colorado, pp. 1109-1112.
37. Beckman, M. & G. Elam. 1997. Guidelines for ToBI labeling. (version 3.0). Unpub. ms. (online at: http://www.ling.ohiostate.edu/tobi/ame_tobi/labelling_guide_v3.pdf).
38. Grosjean, F. & M. Collins. 1979: Breathing, pausing and reading. Phonetica, 36, 98-114.
39. Keating, P. & S. Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2002. A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 101, 112-156.
40. Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z. & F. Ferreira. 2007. The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. J. Exper. Psychology: General, 64-81.
41. Wheeldon, L. & A. Lahiri. 1997. Prosodic units in speech production. J. Memory and Language, 37, 356-381.
42. Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. & A. S. Meyer. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
44. Ferreira, F. & B. Swets. 2002. How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. J. of Memory and Language, 46, 57-84.