Don't break, or do: Prosodic boundary preferences

Lingua

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-27

  Frazier, Lyn ^a   Clifton Jr , Charles ^a   Carlson, Katy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Prosodic boundary preferences; Prosody; Psycholinguistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242299269     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00044-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arnold J.E. Wasow T. Losongco A. Ginstrom R. Heaviness vs. newness: the effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering Language 76 2000 28-57
2. Beckman M.E. Ayers G.M. Guidelines for ToBI Labelling, Version 2.0 1993 Ohio State University
3. Carlson K. Clifton Jr. C. Frazier L. Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment Journal of Memory and Language 45 2001 58-81
4. Clifton, Jr., C., Carlson, K., Frazier, L., 2002. Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech 45, 87-114.
5. Fodor J.D. Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27 1998 285-319
6. Gee J. Grosjean F. Performance structure: a psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal Cognitive Psychology 15 1983 411-458
7. Gussenhoven C. The lexical tone contrast of Roermond Dutch in optimality theory. In: Horne M. (Ed.), Prosody: Theory and Experiment 2000 129-167 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
8. Hirotani, M., 2000. Prosodic constraints on Japanese scrambling. Poster presented at the 13th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, San Diego, 30 March-1 April, 2000.
9. Nagel H.N. Shapiro L.P. Nawy R. Prosody and the processing of filler-gap sentences Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23 1994 473-485
10. Pierrehumbert, J. B., 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.
11. Pierrehumbert J. Beckman M. Japanese Tone Structure 1988 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
12. Schafer A.J. Speer S.R. Warren P. White S.D. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29 2000 169-182
13. Selkirk E. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure 1984 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
14. Selkirk E. The interaction of constraints on prosodic phrasing. In: Horne M. Prosody: (Ed.), Theory and Experiment 2000 231-262 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
15. Straub K. Wilson C. McCollum C. Badecker W. Prosodic structure and wh-Questions Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30 2001 379-394
16. Truckenbrodt, H., 1995. Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus, and Prominence. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, MIT.
17. Watson, D. G., Gibson, E., 2001. Linguistic structure and intonational phrasing. Paper presented at the Fourteenth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Philadelphia, 15-17 March 2001.
18. Watson, D. G., Gibson, E., 2002. When does prosody influence parsing? Paper presented at the Fifteenth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, 21-23 March 2002.