Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 101 B, Issue 6, 2019, Pages 646-651

  Aggarwal, V K ^a   Elbuluk, A ^a   Dundon, J ^a   Herrero, C ^a   Hernandez, C ^a   Vigdorchik, J M ^a   Schwarzkopf, R ^a   Iorio, R ^a   Long, W J ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANTERIOR APPROACH; ANTEROLATERAL APPROACH; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEBRIDEMENT; DIRECT LATERAL APPROACH; FEMALE; FEMORAL NERVE; HUMAN; ILIOPSOAS IMPINGEMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE DISEASE; NERVE PARALYSIS; NORTHERN APPROACH; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PARALYSIS; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTERIOR APPROACH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS DISLOCATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INFECTION; TENDINITIS; TIBIA FRACTURE; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT DURATION; WOUND DRAINAGE; WOUND IRRIGATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HIP REPLACEMENT; INCIDENCE; NEW YORK; OPERATION DURATION; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 85067094834     PISSN: 20494394     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1474.R1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1972;54-B:61–76.
2. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1982;64-B:17–19.
3. Waddell J, Johnson K, Hein W, et al. Orthopaedic practice in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: results from the Global Orthopaedic Registry (GLORY). Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2010;39(9 Suppl):5–13.
4. Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:698–704.
5. Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:671.e1–679.e1.
6. Goebel S, Steinert AF, Schillinger J, et al. Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach. Int Orthop 2012;36:491–498.
7. Restrepo C, Mortazavi SMJ, Brothers J, Parvizi J, Rothman RH. Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:417–422.
8. Abdel MP, Chalmers BP, Trousdale RT, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW. Randomized clinical trial of 2-incision vs mini-posterior total hip arthroplasty: differences persist at 10 years. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:2744–2747.
9. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009;91-A(Suppl 2 Pt 1):50–73.
10. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:115–124.
11. de Verteuil R, Imamura M, Zhu S, et al. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip. Health Technol Assess 2008;12:iii-iv, ix-223.
12. Pour AE, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play? J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:1920–1927.
13. Kim S, Losina E, Solomon DH, Wright J, Katz JN. Effectiveness of clinical pathways for total knee and total hip arthroplasty: literature review. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:69–74.
14. Poehling-Monaghan KL, Kamath AF, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW. Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:623–631.
15. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:2432–2438.
16. Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:86–90.
17. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1353–1358.
18. Graves SC, Dropkin BM, Keeney BJ, Lurie JD, Tomek IM. Does surgical approach affect patient-reported function after primary THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474:971–981.
19. No author listed. ASA physical status classification system https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system (date last accessed 16 April 2019).
20. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2992–2994.
21. No authors listed. Specification manual for joint commission national quality core measures (2020A1) https://manual.jointcommission.org/releases/archive/TJC2010B/MIF0110.html (date last accessed 16 April 2019).
22. Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:1634–1638.
23. den Hartog YM, Mathijssen NMC, Vehmeijer SBW. The less invasive anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparison to other approaches and an evaluation of the learning curve - a systematic review. Hip Int 2016;26:105–120.
24. Zawadsky MW, Paulus MC, Murray PJ, Johansen MA. Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and the mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 2014;29:1256–1260.
25. Parvizi J, Restrepo C, Maltenfort MG. Total hip arthroplasty performed through direct anterior approach provides superior early outcome: results of a randomized, prospective study. Orthop Clin North Am 2016;47:497–504.
26. Putananon C, Tuchinda H, Arirachakaran A, et al. Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018;28:255–267.
27. Watts CD, Houdek MT, Wagner ER, et al. High risk of wound complications following direct anterior total hip arthroplasty in obese patients. J Arthroplasty 2015;30:2296–2298.
28. Christensen CP, Karthikeyan T, Jacobs CA. Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014;29:1839–1841.
29. Purcell RL, Parks NL, Cody JP, Hamilton WG. Comparison of wound complications and deep infections with direct anterior and posterior approaches in obese hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:220–223.
30. Purcell RL, Parks NL, Gargiulo JM, Hamilton WG. Severely obese patients have a higher risk of infection after direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016;31(9 Suppl):162–165.
31. Barnett SL, Peters DJ, Hamilton WG, et al. Is the anterior approach safe? Early complication rate associated with 5090 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasty procedures performed using the anterior approach. J Arthroplasty 2016;31: 2291–2294.
32. Berend KR, Mirza AJ, Morris MJ, Lombardi AV Jr. Risk of periprosthetic fractures with direct anterior primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016;31: 2295–2298.
33. Sheth D, Cafri G, Inacio MCS, Paxton EW, Namba RS. Anterior and anterolateral approaches for THA are associated with lower dislocation risk without higher revision risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:3401–3408.
34. Meneghini RM, Elston AS, Chen AF, et al. Direct anterior approach: risk factor for early femoral failure of cementless total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2017;99-A:99–105.
35. Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Huynh C. Comparison of cup alignment, jump distance, and complications in consecutive series of anterior approach and posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015;30:1959–1962.