Prospective Randomized Study of Two Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 671-679.e1

  Restrepo, Camilo ^a   Parvizi, Javad ^a   Pour, Aidin Eslam ^a   Hozack, William J ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct anterior approach; Direct lateral approach; Outcomes; Short term; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WESTERN ONTARIO MCMASTER OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

EID: 77954659564     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berger R.A. Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 2004, 35:143.
2. Berger R.A., Duwelius P.J. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 2004, 35:163.
3. Bertin K.C., Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 248.
4. Hartzband M.A. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am 2004, 35:119.
5. Berger R.A. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect 2004, 53:149.
6. Howell J.R., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am 2004, 35:153.
7. Kennon R., Keggi J., Zatorski L.E., et al. Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(Suppl 2):91.
8. Kennon R.E., Keggi J.M., Wetmore R.S., et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(Suppl 4):39.
9. Sculco T.P. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(4 Suppl 1):78.
10. Siguier T., Siguier M., Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 164.
11. Wenz J.F., Gurkan I., Jibodh S.R. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 2002, 25:1031.
12. Chimento G.F., Pavone V., Sharrock N., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:139.
13. Dorr L.D., Maheshwari A.V., Long W.T., et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1153.
14. Bennett D., Ogonda L., Elliott D., et al. Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery: a prospective blinded study. Gait Posture 2006, 23:374.
15. de B.J., Petruccelli D., Zalzal P., et al. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:945.
16. Mow C.S., Woolson S.T., Ngarmukos S.G., et al. Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:80.
17. Woolson S.T., Mow C.S., Syquia J.F., et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:1353.
18. Berger R.A., Jacobs J.J., Meneghini R.M., et al. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 239.
19. Pour A.E., Parvizi J., Sharkey P.F., et al. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1920.
20. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982, 64:17.
21. Moskal J.T., Mann J.W. A modified direct lateral approach for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. A prospective analysis of 453 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1996, 11:255.
22. Cherny N.I. Opioid analgesics: comparative features and prescribing guidelines. Drugs 1996, 51:713.
23. Levy M.H. Pharmacologic treatment of cancer pain. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:1124.
24. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969, 51:737.
25. Saleh K.J., Mulhall K.J., Bershadsky B., et al. Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1985.
26. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833.
27. Priestman T.J., Baum M. Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer. Lancet 1976, 1:899.
28. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473.
29. Hall K.M., Cohen M.E., Wright J., et al. Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999, 80:1471.
30. Lovell T.P. Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(7 Suppl):64.