High Risk of Wound Complications Following Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in Obese Patients

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2296-2298

  Watts, Chad D ^a   Houdek, Matthew T ^a   Wagner, Eric R ^a   Sculco, Peter K ^a   Chalmers, Brian P ^a   Taunton, Michael J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Complication; Direct anterior; Obesity; Total hip arthroplasty; Wound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBID OBESITY; POSTEROLATERAL APPROACH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPLICATION; HIP REPLACEMENT; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA; OBESITY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA; OBESITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84952874217     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berger R.A., Duwelius P.J. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 2004, 35(2):163.
2. Chimento G.F., Pavone V., Sharrock N., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(2):139.
3. Howell J.R., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am 2004, 35(2):153.
4. O'Brien D.A., Rorabeck C.H. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:99.
5. Sculco T.P., Boettner F. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the posterior approach. Instr Course Lect 2006, 55:205.
6. Ogonda L., Wilson R., Archbold P., et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(4):701.
7. Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., Meneghini R.M., et al. Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(Suppl 2 Pt 1):50.
8. Poehling-Monaghan K.L., Kamath A.F., Taunton M.J., et al. Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015, 473(2):623.
9. Woolson S.T., Mow C.S., Syquia J.F., et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86A(7):1353.
10. Bal B.S., Haltom D., Aleto T., et al. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(11):2432.
11. Barton J.C., Bertoli L.F., O'Malley S. Bilateral subdural hematomas in an adult with hereditary factor VII deficiency: a complication of sit-ups and inversion?. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2009, 15(2):242.
12. Jewett B.A., Collis D.K. High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(2):503.
13. Pagnano M.W., Leone J., Lewallen D.G., et al. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:86.
14. Matta J.M., Shahrdar C., Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:115.
15. Siguier T., Siguier M., Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 426:164.
16. Christensen C.P., Karthikeyan T., Jacobs C.A. Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29(9):1839.
17. Kennon R.E., Keggi J.M., Wetmore R.S., et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85A(Suppl. 4):39.
18. Bozic K.J., Lau E., Kurtz S., et al. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012, 94(9):794.
19. Haverkamp D., Klinkenbijl M.N., Somford M.P., et al. Obesity in total hip arthroplasty-does it really matter? A meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 2011, 82(4):417.
20. Jamsen E., Nevalainen P., Eskelinen A., et al. Obesity, diabetes, and preoperative hyperglycemia as predictors of periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center analysis of 7181 primary hip and knee replacements for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012, 94(14):e101.
21. Ong K.L., Kurtz S.M., Lau E., et al. Prosthetic joint infection risk after total hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(6 Suppl):105.
22. Houdek M.T., Wagner E.R., Watts C.D., et al. Morbid obesity: a significant risk factor for failure of two-stage revision THA for infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015, 97(4):326.
23. Khurana A., Parker S., Goel V., et al. Dermabond wound closure in primary hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2008, 74(3):349.
24. Miller A.G., Swank M.L. Dermabond efficacy in total joint arthroplasty wounds. Am J Orthop 2010, 39(10):476.
25. Burke N.G., Green C., McHugh G., et al. A prospective randomised study comparing the jubilee dressing method to a standard adhesive dressing for total hip and knee replacements. J Tissue Viability 2012, 21(3):84.
26. Cai J., Karam J.A., Parvizi J., et al. Aquacel surgical dressing reduces the rate of acute PJI following total joint arthroplasty: a case-control study. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29(6):1098.