Setting the scene for the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

International Journal of Stroke

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2019, Pages 450-456

  Bernhardt, Julie ^a   Borschmann, Karen N ^a   Kwakkel, Gert ^b,c   Burridge, Jane H ^d   Eng, Janice J ^e   Walker, Marion F ^f   Bird, Marie Louise ^e   Cramer, Steven C ^g   Hayward, Kathryn S ^a   O’Sullivan, Michael J ^h   Clarkson, Andrew N ⁱ   Corbett, Dale ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Reade Centre for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^j UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Consensus; neurobiology; recommendations; recovery; rehabilitation; stroke

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LIMB MOVEMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROIMAGING; NONHUMAN; PARESIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE REHABILITATION; STROKE SURVIVOR; UPPER LIMB; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPLICATION; ORGANIZATION; REHABILITATION RESEARCH;

COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; REHABILITATION RESEARCH; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION;

EID: 85066857057     PISSN: 17474930     EISSN: 17474949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1747493019851287     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bernhardt J, Borschmann K, Boyd L, Moving rehabilitation research forward: developing consensus statements for rehabilitation and recovery research. Int J Stroke 2016; 11: 454–458.
2. Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 444–450.
3. Boyd LA, Hayward KS, Ward NS, Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 480–493.
4. Corbett D, Carmichael ST, Murphy TH, Enhancing the alignment of the preclinical and clinical stroke recovery research pipeline: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable translational working group. Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 462–471.
5. Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 451–461.
6. Walker MF, Hoffmann TC, Brady MC, Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 472–479.
7. McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke 2011; 42: 1398–1403.
8. Leys D, Henon H, Mackowiak-Cordoliani MA, Poststroke dementia. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 752–759.
9. Douiri A, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Prevalence of poststroke cognitive impairment: South London stroke register 1995-2010. Stroke 2013; 44: 138–145.
10. Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 1006–1018.
11. Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke 2006; 37: 2220–2241.
12. Sachdev P, Kalaria R, O'Brien J, Diagnostic criteria for vascular cognitive disorders: a VASCOG statement. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2014; 28: 206–218.
13. Nithianantharajah J, McKechanie AG, Stewart TJ, Bridging the translational divide: identical cognitive touchscreen testing in mice and humans carrying mutations in a disease-relevant homologous gene. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 14613.
14. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693–1702.
15. Buma F, Kwakkel G, Ramsey N. Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2013; 31: 707–722.
16. Levin MF, Liebermann DG, Parmet Y, Compensatory versus noncompensatory shoulder movements used for reaching in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016; 30: 635–646.
17. Demers M, Levin MF. Do activity level outcome measures commonly used in neurological practice assess upper-limb movement quality? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31: 623–637.
18. Zeiler SR, Krakauer JW. The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. Curr Opin Neurol 2013; 26: 609–616.
19. Tran VD, Dario P, Mazzoleni S. Kinematic measures for upper limb robot-assisted therapy following stroke and correlations with clinical outcome measures: a review. Med Eng Phys 2018; 53: 13–31.
20. Nordin N, Xie SQ, Wunsche B. Assessment of movement quality in robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review. J Neuroeng Rehab 2014; 11: ▪▪.
21. Murphy MA, Hager CK. Kinematic analysis of the upper extremity after stroke – how far have we reached and what have we grasped? Phys Ther Rev 2015; 20: 137–155.
22. Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement. Int J Stroke 2018; 14: 180–185.
23. Balas E, Boren S. Yearbook of medical informatics: managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement, Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer, 2000.
24. Morris PE, Griffin L, Berry M, Receiving early mobility during an intensive care unit admission is a predictor of improved outcomes in acute respiratory failure. Am J Med Sci 2011; 341: 373–377.
25. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation, www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html (2016, accessed 4 May 2019).
26. McCluskey A, Vratsistas-Curto A, Schurr K. Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: ▪▪.
27. Jull J, Giles A, Graham ID. Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implement Sci 2017; 12: 150.
28. Mendis S. Prevention and care of stroke in low- and middle-income countries: the need for a public health perspective. Int J Stroke 2010; 5: 86–91.
29. Yan LL, Li C, Chen J, Prevention, management, and rehabilitation of stroke in low- and middle-income countries. eNeurol Sci 2016; 2: 21–30.
30. World Health Organization. Rehabilitation 2030 a call for action. meeting report, www.who.int/disabilities/care/Rehab2030MeetingReport2.pdf?ua=1 (2017, accessed 4 May 2019).
31. Pollock A, Campbell P, Baer G, Challenges in integrating international evidence relating to stroke rehabilitation: experiences from a Cochrane systematic review. Int J Stroke 2014; 9: 965–967.