Comprehending utterances in Japanese as a foreign language: Formulaicity and literality

Pragmatic Competence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 227-248

  Hagiwara, Akiko ^a  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064595569     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen 2007 Recognition and production of formulas in L2 pragmatics. In: Zhaohong Han (ed.), Understanding Second Language Process, 205-222. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
2. Bouton, Lawrence F. 1988 A cross-cultural study of ability to interpret implicatures in English. World Englishes 7 (2): 183-196
3. Bouton, Lawrence F. 1989 So they got the message, but how did they get it? IDEAL 4: 119-148
4. Bouton, Lawrence F. 1990 The effective use of implicature in English: Why and how it should be taught in the ESL classroom. In: Lawrence F. Bouton and Yamuna Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series volume 1, 43-52, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois: Division of English as an International Language
5. Bouton, Lawrence F. 1992 The interpretation of implicatures in English by NNS: Does it come automatically-without being explicitly taught? In: Lawrence F. Bouton and Yamuna Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph series volume 3, 183-197. Urbana-Champaign, Illinois: Division of English as an International Language
6. Bouton, Lawrence F. 1994a Can NNS skill in interpreting implicature in American English be improved through explicit instruction?-A pilot study. In: Lawrence F. Bouton and Yamuna Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning. Monograph Series volume 5, 88-109. Urbana-Champaign, Illinois: Division of English as an International Language
7. Bouton, Lawrence F. 1994b Conversational implicature in a second language: Learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 157-167
8. Clark, Herbert H. 1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9. Conklin, Kathy and Norbert Schmitt 2008 Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29 (1): 72-89
10. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1982 A critical examination of the contribution of literal meaning to understanding non-literal discourse. Text 2: 9-27
11. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1985 On the process of understanding idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 14: 465-472
12. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1986 Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse Processes 9: 17-30
13. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
14. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 2002 A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (4): 457-486
15. Giora, Rachel 2003 On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
16. Grice, H. Paul 1975 Logic and conversation. In: Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41-59. New York: Academic Press
17. Grice, H. Paul 1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
18. Holtgraves, Thomas 2007 Second language learners and speech act comprehension. Language Learning 57: 595-610
19. Kecskes, Istvan 2003 Situation-Bound Utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
20. Kecskes, Istvan 2006 On my mind: thoughts about salience, context and figurative language from a second language perspective. Second Language Research 22 (2): 219-237
21. Kecskes, Istvan 2007 Formulaic language in English Lingua Franca. In: Istvan Kecskes and Laurence R. Horn (eds.), Explorations in Pragmatics, 191-218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
22. Lee, Jin Sook 2002 Interpreting conversational implicatures: A study of Korean learners of English. The Korea TESOL Journal 5 (1): 1-26
23. Morgan, Jerry L. 1991 Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In: Steven Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, 242-253. New York: Oxford University Press
24. Schmitt, Norbert 2004 Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In: Norbert Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use, 1-22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company
25. Taguchi, Naoko 2007 Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly 41 (2): 313-338
26. Taguchi, Naoko 2008 Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a study-abroad context. Language Learning 58 (1): 33-71
27. Toothaker, Larry E. 1991 Multiple Comparisons for Researchers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc
28. Underwood, Geoffrey, Norbert Schmitt and Adam Galpin 2004 The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In: Norbert Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use, 153-172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company
29. Wray, Alison 2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30. Yamanaka, Janice E. 2003 Effects of proficiency and length of residence on the pragmatic comprehension of Japanese ESL learners. Second Language Studies 22 (1): 107-175