Becoming more articulate about the theories that motivate our work

Cscl 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 347-355

  Koschmann, Timothy ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064293509     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410601544-21     Document Type: Editorial

References (29)

1. Barab, S., Cherkes-Julkowski, M., Swenson, R., Garrett, S., Shaw, R., & Young, M. (1999). Principles of self-organization: Learning as participation in autocatkinetic systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 349-390.
2. Burke, T. (1994). Dewey’s new logic: A reply to Russell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.
4. Dewey, J. (1991). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J.A.Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953, Vol. 12. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press. (Originally published in 1938)
5. Dewey, J. (1991). Experience and education. In J.A.Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1938-1939, Vol. 13 (pp. 1-62). Carbondale, IL: SIU Press. (Originally published in 1939)
6. Dewey, J. (1991/1941). Propositions, warranted assertability, and truth. In J.A.Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1939-1941, Vol. 14 (pp. 168-188). Carbondale, IL: SIU Press. (Originally published in 1941)
7. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1991). Knowing and the known. In J.A.Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1949-1952, Vol. 16. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press. (Originally published in 1949)
8. Duschl, R., & Hamilton, R. (1998). Conceptual change in science and in the learning of science. In B.Eraser & K.Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1047-1065). London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
9. Garrison, J. (1995). Deweyan pragmatism and the epistemology of contemporary social constructivism. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 716-740.
10. Gitomer, D., & Duschl, R. (1998). Emerging issues and practices in science assessment. In B.Eraser & K.Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 791-810). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Goldman, S., & Greeno, J. (1998). Thinking practices: Images of thinking and learning in education. In J.Greeno & S.Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 1-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Goodwin, C. (1986). Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62, 29-49.
13. Goodwin, C. (in press). Practices of seeing, visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In C.Jewitt & T.van Leeuwen (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage.
14. Hall, R. (1996). Representation as shared activity: Situated cognition and Dewey’s cartography of experience. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 209-238.
15. Hammer, D. (1995). Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 401-430.
16. Hanks, W. (1990). Referential practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
18. Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287-315.
21. Lagemann, E.C. (1989). The plural worlds of educational research. History of Education Quarterly, 29, 185-214.
22. LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gesture, knowledge, and the world. In D.McNeill (Ed.), Review of language and gesture: Window into thought and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Nardi, B. (1996). Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In B.Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 7-16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Pea, R. (2000). Closing panel: Where do we go from here? In T.Koschmann, L.Sadler, M.Lamon, M., & B.Fishman (Eds.), CSCZ, '97 CD-ROM. Distributed in R.Hall, N.Miyake, & N.Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL '97. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51-68.
27. Smith, R., O’Shea, T, O’Malley, C., Scanlon, E., & Taylor, J. (1991). Preliminary experiments with a distributed, multimedia, problem solving environment. In J.Bowers & S.Benford (Eds.), Studies in computer-supported cooperative work: Theory, practice, and design (pp. 31-48). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28. Streeck, J. (1996). How to do things with things: Objects trouves and symbolization. Human Studies, 19, 696-735.
29. Suzuki, H., & Kato, H. (1995, October). Interaction-level support for collaborative learning: AlgoBlock, an open programming language. In J.Schnase & E.Cunnius (Eds.), CSCL 95: Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 349-355). Rahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved November 2, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www-cscl95.indiana.edu/cscl95/suzuki.html