Integrating adaptive and intelligent techniques into a web-based environment for active learning

Intelligent Systems: Technology and Applications, Six Volume Set

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages IV-229-IV-260

  Shi, Hongchi ^a   Rodriguez, Othoniel ^a   Shang, Yi ^a   Chen, Su Shing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057282133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (146)

1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O., The semantic Web, a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities, Sci. Am., 2001, http://www.sciam.com/2001/0501issue/0501berners-lee.html.
2. IMS, Learner Information Packaging Information Model Specification, Public Draft Specification, version 1.0, 2000, http://www.imsproject.org/profiles/index.html.
3. IMS, Question and Test Interoperability Specification, Public Draft Specification, version 1.1, 2000, http://www.imsproject.org/question/index.html.
4. IMS, Learning Object Metadata Specification, Public Draft Specification, version 1.2, 2000, http://www.imsproject.org/metadata/index.html.
5. Shank, R., Virtual Learning: A Revolutionary Approach to Building a Highly SkilledWorkforce, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1997.
6. Brusilovsky, P., Adaptive and intelligent technologies for Web-based education, Kunstliche Intelligenz, 4, 19, 1999.
7. Shang, Y. and Shi, H., IDEAL: an integrated distributed environment for asynchronous learning, in Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Distributed Communities on the Web (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1830), 182, 2000.
8. Shang, Y., Shi, H., and Chen, S., Agent technology in computer science and engineering curriculum, Proceedings of the 5thACMAnnual Conference on Innovation andTechnology in Computer Science Education, Helsinki, Finland, 120, 2000.
9. Shi, H., Shang, Y., and Chen, S., A multi-agent system for computer science education, Proceedings of the 5th ACMAnnual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Helsinki, Finland, 1, 2000.
10. Shi, H., Shang, Y., and Chen, S., Smart instructional component based course content organization and delivery, Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Canterbury, UK, June 2001.
11. Shang Y., Shi, H., and Chen, S., An intelligent distributed environment for active learning, Proceedings of the12th World Wide Web Conference, Hong Kong, May, 308, 2001.
12. Shang, Y., Shi, H., and Chen, S., An intelligent distributed environment for active learning, J. Educ. Resour. Comput., 1(2), 1, 2001.
13. Stern, M.K. andWoolf, B.P., Curriculum sequencing in a web-based tutor, in Intelligence Tutoring System (Proceedings of the 4th International Conference ITS '98), Goettl, B.P. et al., Eds., Springer, 584, 1998.
14. Weber, G., Individual selection of examples in an intelligent learning environment, J. Artif. Intelligence Educ., 7(1), 3, 1996.
15. Barr, A., Beard, M., and Atkinson, R.C., The computer as tutorial laboratory: the Stanford BIP project, Int. J. Man Machine Studies, 8(5), 567, 1976.
16. Weber, G. and Specht, M., User modeling and adaptive navigation support in www-based tutoring systems, in User Modeling, Jameson, A., Paris, C., and Tasso, C., Eds., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 289, 1997.
17. Specht, M. et al., AST: adaptive www-courseware for statistics, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Adaptive Systems and User Modeling on the World Wide Web at the 6th International Conference on User Modeling, UM97, Brusilovsky, P., Fink, J., and Kay, J., Eds., 91, 1997.
18. Specht, M. and Oppermann, R., ACE-adaptive courseware environment, New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia, 4, 141, 1998.
19. Henze, N. et al., Adaptive hyperbooks for constructivist teaching, Kunstliche Intelligenz, 4, 26, 1999.
20. Brusilovsky, P., Eklund, J., and Schwarz, E., Web-based education for all: a tool for developing adaptive courseware, Comput. Networks ISDN Syst., 30, 291, 1998.
21. Brusilovsky, P., Ritter, S., and Schwarz, E., Distributed intelligent tutoring on the Web, in Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Media in Learning Systems, Boulay, B.D. and Mizoguchi, R., Eds., IOS, Amsterdam, 482, 1997.
22. Nakabayashi, K. et al., Architecture of an intelligent tutoring system on the WWW, in Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Media in Learning Systems, Boulay, B.D. and Mizoguchi, R., Eds., IOS, Amsterdam, 39, 1997.
23. Anjaneyulu, K., Concept level modeling on the WWW, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Educational Systems on the World Wide Web at AI-ED '97, 8th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Brusilovsky, P., Nakabayashi, K., and Ritter, S., Eds., 26, 1997.
24. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., and Weber, G., ELM-ART: an intelligent tutoring system on World Wide Web, in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1086, Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., and Lesgold, A., Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 261, 1996.
25. Anderson, J.R. and Reiser, B., The LISP tutor, Byte, 10(4), 159, 1985.
26. Beck, J.E. and Woolf, B.P., Using a learning agent with a student model, in Intelligence Tutoring System (Proceedings of the 4th International Conference ITS '98), Goettl, B.P. et al., Eds., Springer, 6, 1998.
27. Brusilovsky, P., Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6(2-3), 87, 1996.
28. Jameson, A., Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: an overview of systems and issues, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5, 193, 1996.
29. Kay, J. and Kummerfeld, B., User models for customized hypertext, in Intelligent Hypertext:Advanced Techniques for the World Wide Web (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1326), Nicholas, C. and Mayfield, J., Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
30. De Bra, P. and Calvi, L., AHA: an open adaptive hypermedia architecture, New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia, 4, 115, 1998.
31. Hohl, H., Bocker, H.D., and Gunzenhauser, R., Hypadapter: an adaptive hypertext system for exploratory learning and programming, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6(2-3), 131, 1996.
32. Hoppe, U., Use of multiple student modeling to parameterize group learning, in Proceedings of AI-ED '95, 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Greer, J., Ed., 234, 1995.
33. Oda, T., Satoh, H., and Watanabe, S., Searching deadlocked Web learners by measuring similarity of learning activities, Proceedings of the WWW-Based Tutoring Workshop at the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS '98), San Antonio, TX, 1998.
34. Novak, G.M., Patterson, E.T., and Gavrin, A.D., Eds., Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning With Web Technology, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.
35. IUPUI-JITT, http://webphysics.iupui.edu/jitt/jitt.html.
36. Hartman, V.F., Teaching and learning style preferences: transitions through technology, VCCA J., 9(2), 18, 1995.
37. Bonwell, C., Building a supportive climate for active learning, Natl. Teaching Learning Forum, 6(1), 4, 1996.
38. Richards, L.G., Promoting active learning with cases and instructional modules, J. Eng. Educ., 84(4), 375, 1995.
39. Rubin, L. and Hebert, C., Model for active learning: collaborative peer teaching, College Teaching, 46(1), 26, 1998.
40. Kafai, Y. and Resnik, M., Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1996.
41. Jonassen, D., Evaluating constructivist learning, Educ. Technol., 36(9), 28, 1991.
42. Buron, C., Grinder, M., and Ross, R., Tying it all together: creating self-contained, animated, interactive, Web-based resources for computer science education, SIGCSE Bull., 31(1), 7, 1999.
43. Carver, C., Howard, R., and Lane, W., Enhancing student learning through hypermedia courseware and incorporation of student learning styles, IEEE Trans. Educ., 42(1), 33, 1999.
44. Chou, C., Developing hypertext-based learning courseware for computer networks: the macro and micro stages, IEEE Trans. Educ., 42(1), 39, 1999.
45. Davidovic, A. and Trichina, E., Open learning environment and instruction system (OLEIS), SIGCSE Bull., 30(3), 69, 1998.
46. Latchman, H. et al., Information technology enhanced learning in distance and conventional education, IEEE Trans. Educ., 42(4), 247, 1999.
47. Ehrman, M., The role of personality type in adult language learning: an ongoing investigation, in Language Aptitude Reconsidered, Parry, T. and Stansfield, C., Eds., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 126, 1990.
48. Jung, C.G., Psychological Types, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1921.
49. Myers, I.B. and Myers, P.B., Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, 1993.
50. Keefe, J.W., Ed., Student Learning Styles and Brain Behavior, National Association of Secondary School Principals, Reston, VA, 1982.
51. Harshman and Paivio, Paradoxical sex differences in self-reported imagery, Canadian J. Psychol., 41, 287, 1987.
52. Zakay, D., Block, R.A., and Tsal, Y., Prospective duration estimation and performance, in Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application, Gopher, D. and Koriat, A., Eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 557, 1999.
53. Bodi, S., Critical thinking and bibliographic instruction: the relationship, J. Academic Librarianship, 14(3), 150, 1988.
54. Cranton, P., Working with Adult Learners, Wall and Emerson, Toronto, 1992.
55. McNeer, E., Learning theories and library instruction, J. Academic Librarianship, 17(5), 294, 1991.
56. Carol, D., Bridging the gap: the contributions of individual women to the development of distance education, in Toward New Horizons for Women in Distance Education: International Perspectives, Faith, K., Ed., Routledge, London, 1988.
57. MacKeracher, D., Women as learners, in The Craft of Teaching Adults, Barer-Stein, T. and Draper, J.A., Eds., Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL, 1994.
58. Blum, K.D., Gender differences in asynchronous learning in higher education: learning styles, participation barriers and communication patterns, JALN, 3(1), 1999.
59. Spender, D., Men’s Studies Modified: The Impact of Feminism on Academic Disciplines, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981.
60. Vanfossen, B., Gender differences in communication, in ITROW’sWomen and Expression Conference, Institute for Teaching and Research on Women, Towson State University, Maryland, 1996.
61. Burge, E. and Lenskyj, H., Women studying in distance education: a case study, Am. J. Distance Educ., 4(2), 1990.
62. Hensel, N., Realizing gender equality in higher education: the need to integrate work/family issues, ASHE/ERIC Higher Educ. Rep., 2, 1991.
63. Tisdel, E.J., Poststructural feminist pedagogies: the possibilities and limitations of feminist emancipatory adult learning theory and practice, Adult Educ. Q., 48(3), 1998.
64. Bailey, S.M., Shortcoming girls and boys, Educ. Leadership, 53(8), 1996.
65. Cross, K.P., Adults as Learners, Jossey-Bass Publishing, London, 1981.
66. LTSC, IEEE learning technology standards committee Website, http://ltsc.ieee.org/.
67. IMS, IMS global learning consortium Website, http://imsproject.org/.
68. Advanced Distributed Learning Network, SCORM, Shareable Content Object Reference Model, http://www.adlnet.org/.
69. MacroMedia Inc., eLearning Studio, http://www.macromedia.com/software/elearningstudio/.
70. Adobe, eBook Reader, http://www.adobe.com/products/ebookreader/main.html.
71. CISCO, Interactive Mentor, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/710/cim/index.html.
72. Reigeluth, C.M., Ed., Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1999.
73. Reigeluth, C.M., The elaboration theory: guidance for scope and sequence decisions, in Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Reigeluth, C.M., Ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 5, 1999.
74. Gibbons, A.S. et al., Work models: still beyond instructional objectives, Machine Mediated Learning, 5(3-4), 221, 1995.
75. van Merriënboer, J.J., Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997.
76. Wilson, B. and Cole, P., A critical review of elaboration theory, Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 40(3), 63, 1992.
77. Gibbons, A.S. and Fairweather, P.G., Computer-Based Instruction: Design and Development, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998.
78. Burton, R.R., Brown, J.S., and Fischer, G., Skiing as a model of instruction, in Everyday Cognition:Its Development in Social Context, Rogoff, B. and Lave, J., Eds., Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 139, 1984.
79. Dunn, R., How to Implement and Supervise a Learning Style Program, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 1996.
80. Silver, H.S., Strong, R.W., and Perini, M.J., So Each May Learn: Integrating Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, ASCD, Alexandria VA, 2000.
81. Felder, R.M. and Silverman, L.K., Index of learning styles (ILS) http://www2.ncsu.edu,/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html.
82. Pham, P.M. Learning styles, http://payson.tulane.edu/ppham/Learning/lstlyes.html.
83. Felder R.M. and Soloman, B.A., Index of learning styles questionnaire, http://www2.ncsu. edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/ilsweb.html.
84. W3C Consortium, User agent accessibility guidelines, 1.0 Working Draft, June 22, 2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-UAAG10-20010622/.
85. Clark, R.C., Four architectures of instruction, Performance Improvement J., 39(10), 2000.
86. Clark, R.C., Building Expertise: Cognitive Methods for Training and Performance Improvement, International Society for Performance Improvement, Washington, D.C., 1998.
87. Murray, W., A practical approach to Bayesian student modeling, in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, ITS '98), Goetth, B. et al., Eds., Springer, 424, 1998.
88. Brusilovsky, P., Student model centered architecture for intelligent learning environment, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on User Modeling, 1994.
89. Petrushin, V. and Sinista, K., Using probabilistic reasoning techniques for learner modeling, Proc. World Conf. AI Educ., 418, 1993.
90. Villano, M., Probabilistic student models: Bayesian belief networks and knowledge space theory, in Intelligent Tutoring System (Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference ITS '92), Springer, 491, 1992.
91. Bauer, M., A Dempster-Shafer approach to modeling agent references for plan recognition, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interactions, 5, 317, 1996.
92. Hawkes, L., Derry, S., and Rundersteiner, E., Individualized tutoring using an intelligent fuzzy temporal relational database, Int. J. Man Machine Studies, 33, 409, 1990.
93. Anderson, J. et al., Cognitive tutors: lessons learning, J. Learning Sci., 4(2), 167, 1995.
94. McArthor, D. et al., Skill-oriented task sequencing in an intelligent tutor for basic algebra, Instructional Sci., 17(4), 281, 1988.
95. Anderson, J.R., Language, Memory, and Thought, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1976.
96. Anderson, J.R., The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983.
97. Anderson, J.R., Rules of the Mind, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993.
98. Damasio, A., Decartes’ Error, Grosset/Putnam, New York, 1994.
99. Smolensky, P., On the proper treatment of connectionism, Behav. Brain Sci., 11(1), 1, 1988.
100. Anderson, J.R., Acquisition of cognitive skill, Psychol. Rev., 89, 369, 1982.
101. Rosenbloom, P., Laird, J., andNewell, A., TheSOARPapers: Research on Integrated Intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
102. Jones, R. and VanLehn, K., Acquisition of children’s addition strategies: a model of impasse-free knowledge-level learning, Machine Learning, 16, 11, 1994.
103. Berry D. and Broadbent, D., Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction, Br. J. Psychology., 79, 251, 1988.
104. Lewicki, P., Hill, T., and Czyzewska, M., Nonconscious acquisition of information, Am. Psychol., 47, 796, 1992.
105. Stanley, W. et al., Insight without awareness: on the interaction of verbalization, instruction and practice in a simulated process control task, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 41A(3), 553, 1989.
106. Sun, R., Learning, action, and consciousness: a hybrid approach towards modeling consciousness, Neural Networks, 10(7), 1317, 1997.
107. Sun, R., Merrill, E., and Peterson, T., From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: a bottom-up model of skill learning, Cognitive Sci., 2000.
108. Sun, R. and Peterson, T., Autonomous learning of sequential tasks: experiments and analyses, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 9(6), 1217, 1998.
109. Gelfand, J., Handelman, D., and Lane, S., Integrating knowledge-based systems and neural networks for robotic skill acquisition, in Proceedings of the IJCAI, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 193, 1989.
110. Maclin, R. and Shavlik, J., Incorporating advice into agents that learn from reinforcements, in Proceedings of AAAI-94, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 694, 1994.
111. Sun, R. and Bookman, L., Eds., Computational Architectures Integrating Neural and Symbolic Processes, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 1994.
112. Watkins, C., Learning with delayed rewards, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 1989.
113. Lin, L.J., Self-improving reactive agents based on reinforcement learning, planning, and teaching, Machine Learning, 8(3/4), 293, 1992.
114. W3C, Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.0 specifications, http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/.
115. Adobe SVG Viewer, http://www.adobe.com/svg/viewer/install/.
116. CSIRO SVG Tool Kit, http://sis.cmis.csiro.au/svg/.
117. Bathik SVG ToolKit, http://xml.apache.org/batik/.
118. JASC Software Inc., WebDraw, http://www.jasc.com/webdraw.asp.
119. Barnett, L. et al., Design and implementation of an interactive tutorial framework, SIGCSE Bull., 30(1), 87, 1998.
120. Weiss, G., Ed., Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
121. Angelo, T.A., The campus as learning community: seven promising shifts and seven powerful levers, AAHE Bull., 49(9), 3, 1997.
122. Cross, K.P., Why learning communities? Why now? About Campus, 3(3), 4, 1998.
123. Tinto, V., Universities as learning organizations, About Campus, 1(6), 2, 1997.
124. Hattori, F. et al., Socialware: multiagent systems for supporting network communities, Commun. ACM, 42(3), 55, 1999.
125. Key, M.R., Male/Female Language, The Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ, 1975.
126. Spender, D., Invisible Women, The Women’s Press, London, 1982.
127. Stalker, J., Women and adult education: rethinking androcentric research, Adult Educ. Q., 46(2), 98, 1996.
128. Oram, A., Ed., Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Benefits of a Disruptive Technology, O’Reilly & Associates, 2001.
129. SUN, Java Web Start, http://java.sun.com/products/javawebstart.
130. JCP, Java network launching protocol, Java Community Process, http://www.jcp.org/.
131. W3C, Simple object access protocol (SOAP) 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP.
132. W3C, Web services description language (WSDL) 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.
133. ECMA, Standard ECMA-262 ECMAScript language specifications 3rd ed., December 1999, http://www.ecma.ch/ecma1/stand/ecma-262.htm.
134. W3C, Document object model (DOM) technical reports, 2nd ed., http://www.w3.org/DOM/DOMTR.
135. UIUC-NCSA, The common gateway interface, http://hoohoo.ncsa.uiuc.edu/cgi/overview.html.
136. SUN, Java servlet technology: the power behind the server, http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/.
137. SUN, Java server pages: dynamically generated Web content, http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/.
138. JDOM, http://www.jdom.org/.
139. W3C, Extensible stylesheet language (XSL) 1.0 specifications, http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/.
140. W3C, XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt11/.
141. Shang, Y. and Shi, H., A Web-based multi-agent system for interpreting medical images, World Wide Web, 2(4), 209, 1999.
142. Chen, S. et al., Personalizing digital libraries for learners, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’2001), Munich, Germany, September 2001.
143. Shang, Y., Sapp, C., and Shi, H., An intelligent Web representative, Information, 3(2), 2000.
144. JATLite, http://java.stanford.edu/java-agent/html.
145. Freeman, E., Hupfer, S., and Arnold, K., JavaSpaces Principles, Patterns, and Practice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999.
146. Finin, T. and Fritzson, R., KQML-a language and protocol for knowledge and information exchange, Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, 126, 1994.