Citizen participation and the rise of digital media platforms in smart governance and smart cities

International Journal of E-Planning Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 19-34

  Gil, Olga ^a   Cortés Cediel, María E ^a   Cantador, Iván ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Citizen participation; E governance; E participation; E platforms; G2B; G2C; G2G; Smart cities; Smart government

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; GOVERNMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MEDIA ROLE; POLICY MAKING; SERVICE PROVISION; SMART CITY;

EID: 85057171734     PISSN: 21609918     EISSN: 21609926     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/IJEPR.2019010102     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alawadhi, S., Aldama-Nalda, A., Chourabi, H., Gil-García, J. R., Leung, S., Mellouli, S., Walker, S. 2012. Building understanding of smart city initiatives. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 40-53).
2. Asiaone. (n.d.). Blockpooling, Retrieved from http://www.asiaone.com/singapore/facebook-neighbors.
3. Backus, M. (2001). E-Governance and Developing Countries: Introduction and Examples (Technical report). The Hague, The Netherlands: The International Institute for Communication and Development.
4. Better Reikjavik. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://betrireykjavik.is.
5. Billiji. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://billiji.com.
6. Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2009). An Assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 Technologies in Urban Planning Practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities (London, England), 27(3), 172-181. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008.
7. Campos, E. (2010). Participación ciudadana en el ámbito municipal. Reflexiones teórico-empíricas y prácticas participativas.
8. Cantador, I., Bellogín, A., Cortés-Cediel, M. E., & Gil, O. (2017). Personalized recommendations in e-participation: Offline experiments for the 'Decide Madrid' platform. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Recommender Systems for Citizens. doi:10.1145/3127325.3127330.
9. Casey, C., & Li, J. (2014). Web 2.0 Technologies and Authentic Participation: Engaging Citizens in Decision Making Processes. Cyber Behavior: Concepts. In Methodologies, Tools and Applications (pp. 767-793). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
10. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-García, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., & Scholl, H. J. et al. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2289-2297). IEEE.
11. Coleman, S. (2008). Doing IT for themselves: Management versus autonomy in youth e-citizenship. In W. Lance Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 189-206). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12. Conroy, M. M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2006). E-participation in Planning: An Analysis of Cities Adopting on-line citizen Participation Tools. Government and Policy, 24(3), 371-384. doi:10.1068/c1k.
13. Creighton, J. L. (2005). The public participation handbook: Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement. John Wiley & Sons.
14. Cunill, N. (1991). Participación ciudadana. Caracas: CLAD.
15. Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review, 68(s1), S86-S102. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x.
16. European Union. (2001). European Governance - A White Paper. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressrelease-DOC-01-10-en.htm.
17. FixMyStreet. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.fixmystreet.com.
18. Gil, O. (2016). Análisis de Políticas Públicas en Perspectiva Comparada. In E. A. de la Política Mikel Barreda & L. Ruiz (Eds.), Huygens (pp. 463-480). Barcelona.
19. Goodspeed, R. C. (2008). Citizen Participation and the Internet in Urban Planning. Unpublished master's thesis for the Degree of Master of Community Planning, University of Maryland, College Park.
20. Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding 'anticipatory governance.' Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218-242. doi:10.1177/0306312713508669 PMID:24941612.
21. Línea Verde. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.Lineaverdemunicipal.com.
22. Neis, P., Zielstra, D., & Zipf, A. (2012). The Street Network Evolution of Crowdsourced Maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007-2011. Future Internet., 4(1), 1-21. doi:10.3390/fi4010001.
23. New Urban Mechanics. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.boston.gov/departments/new-urban-mechanics.
24. O'Reilly, T. (2010). Government as a Platform. In D. Lathrop & L. Ruma (Eds.), Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. O'Reilly Media.
25. Open Street Map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/about.
26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Citizens as partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. OECD Publishing.
27. Paris Madame la Maire. (n.d.). J'ai un idée. Retrieved from https://idee.paris.fr.
28. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511720444.
29. Paudyn, B. (2014). Credit Ratings and Sovereign Debt: The Political Economy of Creditworthiness through Risk and Uncertainty. Springer. doi:10.1057/9781137302779.
30. Paudyn, B. (2017). Financial Engineering through risk uncertainty: The performative political economy of credit worthiness and its self-generative effects for credit rating agencies. International Political Sociology.
31. Peerby. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.peerby.com.
32. Peng, Z.-R. (2001). Internet GIS for public participation. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 28(6), 889-905. doi:10.1068/b2750t.
33. Peta Jakarta. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://petajakarta.org.
34. Rinner, C., Keßler, C., & Andrulis, S. (2008). The use of Web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32(5), 386-395. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.08.004.
35. Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315-353. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288.
36. Rowley, J. (2011). e-Government stakeholders - Who are they and what do they want? International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 53-62. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.005.
37. Sharing City Seoul. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://english.sharehub.kr/what-is-a-sharing-city-seoul.
38. Small Business Research Initiative in UK. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sbri.innovateuk.org.
39. Ushahidi. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ushahidi.com/about.
40. Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered e-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 487-497. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.005.
41. Weber, M. (1946). Bureaucracy. In From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 232-235).
42. World Bank. 1992. Governance and Development. Washington, DC, April 1992. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/604951468739447676/Governance-and-development.
43. World Urbanization ProspectUN. (2014). Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup.
44. Youth Boston. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://youth.boston.gov/youth-lead-the-change.