Web 2.0 technologies and authentic public participation: Engaging citizens in decision making processes

Cyber Behavior: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications

Volumn 2-4, Issue , 2014, Pages 767-793

  Casey, Colleen ^a   Li, Jianling ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE PAVEMENTS;

DECISION MAKING PROCESS; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATORS; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGIES; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES; TRANSPORTATION DECISION MAKING; WEB 2.0; WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGIES;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84960480360     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-5942-1.ch039     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Alcock, P. (2004). Participation or pathology: Contradictory tensions in area-based policy. Social Policy and Society, 3(2), 87-96. doi:10.1017/S1474746403001556.
2. Baker, W., Addam, H., & Davis, B. (2005). Critical factors for enhancing municipal public hearings. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 490-499. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00474.x.
3. Burke, N., Chomitz, V., Rioles, N., Winslow, S., Brukilacchio, L., & Baker, J. (2009). The path to active living: Physical activity through community design in Somerville, Massachusetts. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S386-S394. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.010 PMID:19944939.
4. Carr, D., & Halvorsen, K. (2001). An evaluation of three democratic, community-based approaches to citizen participation: Surveys, conversations with community groups, and community dinners. Society & Natural Resources, 14, 107-126. doi:10.1080/089419201300000526.
5. City of Kirkland. Washington. (2009). More people, more places, more often: A plan for active transportation. Retrieved February 13, 2011, from http://www.ci.kirkland.wa.us/depart/Public_Works/Transportation___Streets/Active_Transportation_Plan.htm.
6. Corburn, J., & Bhatia, R. (2007). Health impact assessment in San Francisco: Incorporating the social determinants of health into environmentalplanning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(3), 241-256. doi:10.1080/09640560701260283.
7. Crosby, N., Kelly, J. M., & Schaefer, P. (1986). Citizen panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 46(2), 170-178. doi:10.2307/976169.
8. D'Agostino, M. (2009). Securing an effective voice for citizens in intergovernmental administrative decision making. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(8), 658-680. doi:10.1080/01900690903000054.
9. Deehr, R., & Shumann, A. (2009). Active Seattle: Achieving walkability in diverse neighborhoods. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S403-S411. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.026 PMID:19944941.
10. Dekker, K., Volker, B., & Lelievelet, H. (2010). Civic engagement in urban neighborhoods: Does the network of civic organizations influence participation in neighborhood projects. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(5), 609-632. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00524.x.
11. Dobson, N., & Gilrow, A. (2009). From partnership to policy: The evolution of active living by design in Portland, Oregon. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(6S2), S436-S444.
12. Florino, D. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 15(2), 226-243. doi:10.1177/016224399001500204.
13. Geraghty, A., Seifert, W., Preston, T., Holm, C., Duarte, T., & Farrar, S. (2009). Partnership moves community towards complete streets. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S420-S427. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.009 PMID:19944943.
14. Gomez-Feliciano, L., McCreary, L., Sadowsky, R., Peterson, S., Hernandez, A., & McElmurry, B. etal. (2009). Active living Logan Square: Joining together to create opportunities for physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S361-S367. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.003 PMID:19944936.
15. Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., & Calnan, M. (2008). Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: Process, engagement and outcome. Health Expectations, 11(3), 272-281. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00502.x PMID:18816323.
16. Goodwin, B. (2008). Matrix of Web 2.0 technologies. Retrieved February 2011, from http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103597.
17. Government Services Administration (GSA). (2009a). GSA social media handbook. Retrieved from http://www.gsa.gov/graphics/staffoffices/socialmediahandbook.pdf.
18. Government Services Administration (GSA). (2009b). GSA Social media policy. Retrieved from http://www.gsa.gov/graphics/staffoffices/socialmediapolicy.pdf.
19. Government Services Administration (GSA). (2009c). GSA promotes best practice for citizen service. Retrieved fromhttp://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103597.
20. Hamamoto, M., Derauf, D., & Yoshimura, S. (2009). Building the base: Two active living projects that inspired community participation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S345-S351. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.025 PMID:19944934.
21. Heikkila, T., & Isett, K. R. (2007). Citizen involvement and performance management in special purpose governments. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 238-248. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00710.x.
22. Huberty, J., Dodge, T., Peterson, K., & Balluff, M. (2009). Activate Omaha: The journey to an active living environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S428-S435. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.024 PMID:19944944.
23. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participatory strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419-436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170.
24. Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 56-65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
25. Kettering Foundation. (1989). The public's role in the policy process: A view from state and local policy makers. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
26. King, C., Feltey, K., & Susel, B. (2008). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. In N. Roberts (Ed.), The direct age of citizen participation (pp. 383-400). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. doi:10.2307/977561.
27. Kumar, N., & Vragov, R. (2009). Active citizen participation using ICT tools. Communications of the ACM, 52(1), 118-121. doi:10.1145/1435417.1435444.
28. LeRoux, K. (2009). Paternalistic or participatory governance? Examining opportunities for client participation in nonprofit social service organizations. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 504-517. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01996.x.
29. Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in public participation: Part 1-Local government perspectives. Public Administration, 79(1), 205-222. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00253.
30. Lukensmeyer, C., & Boyd, A. (2004). Putting the "public" back in management: Seven principles for planning meaningful citizen engagement. Public Management, 86(7), 10-15.
31. Mccreedy, M., & Leslie, J. (2009). Get active Orlando: Changing the built environment to increase physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S395-S402. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.013 PMID:19944940.
32. Miller, E., & Scofield, J. (2009). Slavic Village: Incorporating active living into community development through partnerships. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S377-S385. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.023 PMID:19944938.
33. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C.A. § 4331. (1969) National Policy Consensus Center. (2002). Partnering program saves ADOT millions. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/AZ_transportation.pdf.
34. National Policy Consensus Center. (2003a). Bryan Park interchange-Richmond, Virginia. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/VA_bryanpark.pdf.
35. National Policy Consensus Center. (2003b). Colorado shortgrass prairie case study. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/CO_shortgrass.pdf.
36. National Policy Consensus Center. (2003c). Florida strategic intermodal system. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/FL_intermodal.pdf.
37. National Policy Consensus Center. (2003d). Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard reviatalization-Portland, Oregon. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/OR_mlkBlvd.pdf.
38. National Policy Consensus Center. (2003e). Sacramento transportation and air quality collaborative case study. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/CA_AirQual.pdf.
39. National Policy Consensus Center. (2003f). Utah 3500 South partnering agreement. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/UT_3500south.pdf.
40. National Policy Consensus Center. (2003g). Washington-Oregon strategic plan for I-5 corridor. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/WA_OR_stratplan.pdf.
41. National Policy Consensus Center. (n.d.a). Negotiating transportation rules in Oregon. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/OR_transportation.pdf.
42. National Policy Consensus Center. (n.d.b). Case study: Florida DOT gains consensus on state transportation plan. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/FL_trans.pdf.
43. National Policy Consensus Center. (n.d.c). Mediating a highway dispute in Florida. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://www.policyconsensus.org/casestudies/docs/FL_highway.pdf.
44. Omishakin, A., Carlat, J., Hornsby, S., & Buck, T. (2009). Achieving built-environment and active living goals through Music City Moves. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S412-S419. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.005 PMID:19944942.
45. Plough, A., & Krimsky, S. (1987). The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 12(3), 4-10. doi: 10.1622439/87/03/07/j.sthv.2011.02.04.
46. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
47. Raja, S., Ball, M., Booth, J., Haberstro, P., & Veith, K. (2009). Leveraging neighborhood-scale change for policy and program reform in Buffalo, New York. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S352-S360. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.001 PMID:19944935.
48. Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315-353. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288.
49. Roof, K., & Glandon, R. (2008). Tool created to assess health impacts ofdevelopment decisions in Ingham County, Michigan. Journal of Environmental Health, 71(1), 35-38. PMID:18724504.
50. Roof, K., & Maclennan, C. (2008). Tri-county health department in Colorado does more than just review a development plan. Journal of Environmental Health, 71(1), 31-34. PMID:18724503.
51. Roof, K., & Oleru, N. (2008). Public health: Seattle and King County's push for the built environment. Journal of Environmental Health, 71(1), 24-27. PMID:18724501.
52. Roof, K., & Sutherland, S. (2008). Smart growth and health for the future: Our course of action. Journal of Environmental Health, 71(1), 28-30. PMID:18724502.
53. San Francisco Department of Public Health. (n.d.). Health, traffic and environmental justice: A health impact analysis of the Still/Lyell Freeway Channel in Excelsior District. Retrieved December 8, 2010, from http://www.sfphes.org/HIA_PODER.htm.
54. Schasberger, M., Hussa, C., Polgar, M., Mc-Monagle, M., Burke, S., & Gegaris, A. (2009). Promoting and developing a trail network across suburban, rural, and urban communities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S336-S344. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.012 PMID:19944933.
55. Stewart, K. (2007). Write the rules and win: Understanding citizen participation game dynamics. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1067-1076. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00798.x.
56. Swanstrom, T. (2009). Breaking down silos: Transportation, economic development and health. In S. Malekafzali (Ed.), Healthy, equitable transportation policy: Recommendations and research. Retrieved March 2011, from http://www.policylink.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=l kIXLbMNJrE&b=5136581&ct=8439979.
57. Tenbrink, D., McMunn, R., & Panken, S. (2009). Project U-Turn: Increasing active transportation in Jackson, Michigan. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S329-S335. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.004 PMID:19944932.
58. Thomas, I., Sayers, S., Godon, J., & Reilly, S. (2009). Bike, walk, and wheel: A way of life in Columbia, Missouri. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S322-S328. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.002 PMID:19944931.
59. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010a). Colorado Step Up environmental collaboration supported by Web-based technology. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_CO-STEP-UP.pdf.
60. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010b). Maricopa County, Arizona: Regional transportation plan. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Maricopa.pdf.
61. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010c). Wasatch Front Region, Utah: Regional transportation plan. Strategi cHighway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_UT-Wasatch.pdf.
62. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010d). Binghamton metropolitan transportation study.Strategic HighwayResearch Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_NY-Binghamton.pdf.
63. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010e). CALTRANS: Corridor systems management plan: Using performanc emeasures to conduct analysis and make decisions. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Caltrans.pdf.
64. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010f). Colorado US-285: Foxton road to Bailey-Using a context sensitive solutions approach to highway capacity. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved Novemer 23, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Colorado.pdf.
65. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010g). Grand Rapids Michigan: US-131 S-curve replacement, collaborative design and construction closure of central urban access. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Michigan.pdf.
66. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010h). I-69 Trans-Texas corridor study: Using GISST, TEAP, Quantm, SAM,and ProjectSolve technologies. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved November 23, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Texas.pdf.
67. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010i). Idaho's transportation vision. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_ CS_C01_Idaho.pdf.
68. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010j). Illinois Prairie Parkway project: Developing comprehensive transportation system improvements using an in-depth screening process. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved November 23, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Illinois.pdf.
69. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010k). NJ-31 integrated land use and transportation plan.Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_NJ-31.pdf.
70. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010l). Oregon I-5/beltline interchange: Structured decision making using community values as performance measures. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Oregon.pdf.
71. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010m). Puget Sound region, Washington: Regional TIP policy framework and Vision 2040-Using paint the region to evaluate scenarios. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved December 12, 2010, fromhttp://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Washington-PugetSound.pdf.
72. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010n). Sacramento region, California: Blueprint Project. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Sacramento.pdf.
73. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010o). US-24: New Haven Indiana to Defiance, Ohio; The 9-step transportation development process. Strategic highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Ohio-Indiana.pdf.
74. Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2010p). Woodrow Wilson Bridge in Maryland and Virginia: FHWA leads the planning process for bridge redesign. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Case Studies in Collaboration. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_Wilson-Bridge.pdf.
75. Van De Belt, T., Engelen, L., Berben, S., & Schoonhoven, L. (2010). Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(2). Retrieved February 12, 2011, from http://www.jmir.org/2010/2/e18/.
76. Walfoort, N., Clark, J., Bostock, M., & O'Neil, K. (2009). ACTIVE Louisville: Incorporating active living principles into planning and design. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(S62), S368-S376. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.007 PMID:19944937.
77. Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). The Internet in everyday life. Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1002/9780470774298.
78. Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2005). Assessing citizen involvement efforts by local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(2), 191-216.
79. Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67, 249-264. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x.