High throughput in situ metagenomic measurement of bacterial replication at ultra-low sequencing coverage

Nature Communications

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Emiola, Akintunde ^a   Oh, Julia ^a  

^a JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BACTERIAL DNA;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BDELLOVIBRIO; CORYNEBACTERIUM; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METAGENOMICS; NONHUMAN; PROPIONIBACTERIUM ACNES; PSORIASIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS CAPITIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS PASTEURI; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BACTERIUM; CLASSIFICATION; DNA REPLICATION; FEMALE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MALE; MICROBIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SKIN; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BACTERIA; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, BACTERIAL; FEMALE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MALE; METAGENOMICS; MIDDLE AGED; PSORIASIS; SKIN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85057127185     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07240-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Nielsen, H. B. et al. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 822–828 (2014).
2. Tsai, Y. C. et al. Resolving the complexity of human skin metagenomes using single-molecule sequencing. mBio 7, e01948–01915 (2016).
3. Korem, T. et al. Growth dynamics of gut microbiota in health and disease inferred from single metagenomic samples. Science 349, 1101–1106 (2015).
4. Wang, J. D. & Levin, P. A. Metabolism, cell growth and the bacterial cell cycle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 822–827 (2009).
5. Brown, C. T., M. Olm, M. R., Thomas, B. C. & Banfield, J. F. Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1256–1263 (2016).
6. Kafadar, K. The efficiency of the biweight as a robust estimator of location. J. Res Natl. Bur. Stand. 88, 105–116 (1983).
7. Mackiewicz, P., Zakrzewska-Czerwińska, J., Zawilak, A., Dudek, M. R. & Cebrat, S. Where does bacterial replication start? Rules for predicting the oriC region. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 3781–3791 (2004).
8. Hendrickson, H. & Lawrence, J. G. Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites. Mol. Microbiol. 64, 42–56 (2007).
9. Kono, N., Arakawa, K. & Tomita, M. Comprehensive prediction of chromosome dimer resolution sites in bacterial genomes. BMC Genom. 12, 19 (2011).
10. Oh, J. et al. Temporal stability of the human skin microbiome. Cell 165, 854–866 (2016).
11. Conlan, S. et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis pan-genome sequence analysis reveals diversity of skin commensal and hospital infection-associated isolates. Genome Biol. 13, R64 (2012).
12. Kang, D. D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 3, e1165 (2015).
13. Tett, A. et al. Unexplored diversity and strain-level structure of the skin microbiome associated with psoriasis. NPJ Biofilms Micro. 3, 14 (2017).
14. Parisi, R., Symmons, D. P., Griffiths, C. E. & Ashcroft, D. M. Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J. Invest. Dermatol. 133, 377–385 (2013).
15. Belmares, J., Detterline, S., Pak, J. B. & Parada, J. P. Corynebacterium endocarditis species-specific risk factors and outcomes. BMC Infect. Dis. 7, 4 (2007).
16. Parks, D. H. et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1533 (2017).
17. Harini, K., Ajila, V. & Hegde, S. Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus: a future antimicrobial agent? J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 17, 823 (2013).
18. Hong, C. et al. PathoScope 2.0: a complete computational framework for strain identification in environmental or clinical sequencing samples. Microbiome 2, 33 (2014).
19. Kumar, R., Jangir, P. K., Das, J., Taneja, B. & Sharma, R. Genome analysis of Staphylococcus capitis TE8 reveals repertoire of antimicrobial peptides and adaptation strategies for growth on human skin. Sci. Rep. 7, 10447 (2017).
20. Youngren, B., Nielsen, H. J., Jun, S. & Austin, S. The multifork Escherichia coli chromosome is a self-duplicating and self-segregating thermodynamic ring polymer. Genes & Dev. 28, 71–84 (2014).
21. Soler-Bistué, A., Timmermans, M. & Mazel, D. The proximity of ribosomal protein genes to oriC enhances Vibrio cholerae fitness in the absence of multifork replication. mBio 8, e00097–17 (2017).
22. Trojanowski, D., Hołówka, J., Ginda, K., Jakimowicz, D. & Zakrzewska-Czerwińska, J. Multifork chromosome replication in slow-growing bacteria. Sci. Rep. 7, 43836 (2017).
23. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinforma. 10, 421 (2009).
24. Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T. W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).
25. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
26. Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012).
27. Huson, D. H., Auch, A. F., Qi, J. & Schuster, S. C. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res. 17, 377–386 (2007).
28. Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
29. Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
30. Weber, T. et al. antiSMASH 3.0-a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W237–W243 (2015).