Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Volumn 147, Issue , 2019, Pages 132-145

  Wang, Yunsheng ^a,b   Lehtomäki, Matti ^a,b   Liang, Xinlian ^a,b   Pyörälä, Jiri ^a,b,c   Kukko, Antero ^a,b,e   Jaakkola, Anttoni ^a,b   Liu, Jingbin ^a,b,d   Feng, Ziyi ^a,b   Chen, Ruizhi ^d   Hyyppä, Juha ^a,b  

^a FINNISH GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b ACADEMY OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^d WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Airborne laser scanning; Field measurement; Forest inventory; Individual tree; Terrestrial laser scanning; Tree height

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; FORESTRY; LASER APPLICATIONS; SCANNING; SEEBECK EFFECT; STEEL BEAMS AND GIRDERS;

ACCURACY; AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING; FIELD MEASUREMENT; FOREST INVENTORY; INDIVIDUAL TREE; TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING; TREE HEIGHT;

SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BOREAL FOREST; COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA PROCESSING; ESTIMATION METHOD; FIELD METHOD; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST INVENTORY; LASER METHOD; SATELLITE DATA; STAND STRUCTURE; TREE;

SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 85056774343     PISSN: 09242716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Amiri, N., Polewski, P., Yao, W., Krzystek, P., Skidmore, A.K., Detection of single tree stems in forested areas from high density ALS point clouds using 3d shape descriptors. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. IV-2/W4 (2017), 35–42, 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-35-2017.
2. Andersen, H.-E., Reutebuch, S.E., McGaughey, R.J., A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne LIDAR and conventional field methods. Can. J. Remote Sens. 325 (2006), 355–366.
3. Axelsson, P., Dem generation from laser scanner data using adaptive tin models. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. - ISPRS Arch. 33 (2000), 110–117.
4. Bouvier, M., Durrieu, S., Fournier, R.A., Renaud, J.-P., Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 156 (2015), 322–334, 10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.004.
5. Feldpausch, T.R., Lloyd, J., Lewis, S.L., Brienen, R.J.W., Gloor, M., Monteagudo Mendoza, A., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Banin, L., Abu Salim, K., Affum-Baffoe, K., Alexiades, M., Almeida, S., Amaral, I., Andrade, A., Aragão, L.E.O.C., Araujo Murakami, A., Arets, E.J.M.M., Arroyo, L., Aymard, C.G.A., Baker, T.R., Bánki, O.S., Berry, N.J., Cardozo, N., Chave, J., Comiskey, J.A., Alvarez, E., de Oliveira, A., Di Fiore, A., Djagbletey, G., Domingues, T.F., Erwin, T.L., Fearnside, P.M., França, M.B., Freitas, M.A., Higuchi, N., Honorio, C.E., Iida, Y., Jiménez, E., Kassim, A.R., Killeen, T.J., Laurance, W.F., Lovett, J.C., Malhi, Y., Marimon, B.S., Marimon-Junior, B.H., Lenza, E., Marshall, A.R., Mendoza, C., Metcalfe, D.J., Mitchard, E.T.A., Neill, D.A., Nelson, B.W., Nilus, R., Nogueira, E.M., Parada, A., Peh, K.S.-H., Pena Cruz, A., Peñuela, M.C., Pitman, N.C.A., Prieto, A., Quesada, C.A., Ramírez, F., Ramírez-Angulo, H., Reitsma, J.M., Rudas, A., Saiz, G., Salomão, R.P., Schwarz, M., Silva, N., Silva-Espejo, J.E., Silveira, M., Sonké, B., Stropp, J., Taedoumg, H.E., Tan, S., ter Steege, H., Terborgh, J., Torello-Raventos, M., van der Heijden, G.M.F., Vásquez, R., Vilanova, E., Vos, V.A., White, L., Willcock, S., Woell, H., Phillips, O.L., Tree height integrated into pantropical forest biomass estimates. Biogeosciences 9 (2012), 3381–3403, 10.5194/bg-9-3381-2012.
6. Hunter, M.O., Keller, M., Vitoria, D., Morton, D.C., Tree height and tropical forest biomass estimation. Biogeosciences, 108385–8399, 2013, 10.5194/bg-10-8385-2013.
7. Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H., Leckie, D., Gougeon, F., Yu, X., Maltamo, M., Review of methods of small-footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests. Int. J. Remote Sens. 29 (2008), 1339–1366, 10.1080/01431160701736489.
8. Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H., Litkey, P., Yu, X., Haggrén, H., Rönnholm, P., Pyysalo, U., Pitkänen, J., Maltamo, M., 2004. Algorithms and methods of airborne laser-scanning for forest measurements. In: Int. Conf. Natscan - Laser-Scanners For. Landsc. Assess. - Instrum. Process. Methods Appl. Freibg. pp. 4-6102004.
9. Hyyppä, J., Virtanen, J.-P., Jaakkola, A., Yu, X., Hyyppä, H., Liang, X., Feasibility of Google tango and kinect for crowdsourcing forestry information. Forests, 9, 2017, 6, 10.3390/f9010006.
10. Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., Yu, X., Vastaranta, M., Hyyppä, H., Kukko, A., Holopainen, M., Heipke, C., Hirschmugl, M., Morsdorf, F., Næsset, E., Pitkänen, J., Popescu, S., Solberg, S., Wolf, B.M., Wu, J.-C., An international comparison of individual tree detection and extraction using airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens. 4 (2012), 950–974, 10.3390/rs4040950.
11. Kearsley, E., de Haulleville, T., Hufkens, K., Kidimbu, A., Toirambe, B., Baert, G., Huygens, D., Kebede, Y., Defourny, P., Bogaert, J., Beeckman, H., Steppe, K., Boeckx, P., Verbeeck, H., Conventional tree height–diameter relationships significantly overestimate aboveground carbon stocks in the Central Congo Basin. Nat. Commun., 4, 2013, 2269, 10.1038/ncomms3269.
12. Kitahara, F., Nobuya, M., Shigejiro, Y., 2010. Effects of training for inexperienced surveyors on data quality of tree diameter and height measurements [WWW Document]. URL < http://www.metla.fi/silvafennica/abs/sa44/sa444657.htm> (accessed 3.8.18).
13. Larjavaara, M., Muller-Landau, H.C., Measuring tree height: a quantitative comparison of two common field methods in a moist tropical forest. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4 (2013), 793–801, 10.1111/2041-210X.12071.
14. Leckie, D., Gougeon, F., Hill, D., Quinn, R., Armstrong, L., Shreenan, R., Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis. Can. J. Remote Sens. 29 (2003), 633–649, 10.5589/m03-024.
15. Liang, X., Hyyppä, J., Kaartinen, H., Lehtomäki, M., Pyörälä, J., Pfeifer, N., Holopainen, M., Brolly, G., Francesco, P., Hackenberg, J., Huang, H., Jo, H.-W., Katoh, M., Liu, L., Mokroš, M., Morel, J., Olofsson, K., Poveda-Lopez, J., Trochta, J., Wang, D., Wang, J., Xi, Z., Yang, B., Zheng, G., Kankare, V., Luoma, V., Yu, X., Chen, L., Vastaranta, M., Saarinen, N., Wang, Y., International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 144 (2018), 137–179, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.021.
16. Liang, X., Hyyppa, J., Kukko, A., Kaartinen, H., Jaakkola, A., Yu, X., The use of a mobile laser scanning system for mapping large forest plots. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 11 (2014), 1504–1508, 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2297418.
17. Liang, X., Wang, Y., Jaakkola, A., Kukko, A., Kaartinen, H., Hyyppa, J., Honkavaara, E., Liu, J., Forest data collection using terrestrial image-based point clouds from a handheld camera compared to terrestrial and personal laser scanning. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53 (2015), 5117–5132, 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2417316.
18. Luoma, V., Saarinen, N., Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., Vastaranta, M., Holopainen, M., Hyyppä, J., 2017. Assessing precision in conventional field measurements of individual tree attributes. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8020038.
19. Maltamo, M., Mustonen, K., Hyyppä, J., Pitkänen, J., Yu, X., The accuracy of estimating individual tree variables with airborne laser scanning in a boreal nature reserve. Can. J. For. Res. 34 (2004), 1791–1801, 10.1139/x04-055.
20. Næsset, E., Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data. Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (2009), 148–159, 10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.001.
21. Næsset, E., Influence of terrain model smoothing and flight and sensor configurations on detection of small pioneer trees in the boreal–alpine transition zone utilizing height metrics derived from airborne scanning lasers. Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (2009), 2210–2223, 10.1016/j.rse.2009.06.003.
22. Nelson, R., How did we get here? An early history of forestry lidar1. Can. J. Remote Sens. 39 (2013), S6–S17, 10.5589/m13-011.
23. Omule, S.A.Y., Personal bias in forest measurements. For. Chron. 56 (1980), 222–224, 10.5558/tfc56222-5.
24. Päivinen, R., Puutunnusten Mittaamisen Luotettavuus: Accuracy of Certain Tree Measurements. 1992, Metsäntutkimuslaitos.
25. Persson, A., Holmgren, J., Soderman, U., Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 68 (2002), 925–932.
26. Roussel, J.-R., Caspersen, J., Béland, M., Thomas, S., Achim, A., Removing bias from LiDAR-based estimates of canopy height: accounting for the effects of pulse density and footprint size. Remote Sens. Environ. 198 (2017), 1–16, 10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.032.
27. Saatchi, S., Interactive comment on “Tree height integrated into pantropical forest biomass estimates” by T. R. Feldpausch et al. Biogeosciences 9 (2012), 3381–3403, 10.5194/bg-9-3381-2012.
28. Sibona, E., Vitali, A., Meloni, F., Caffo, L., Dotta, A., Lingua, E., Motta, R., Garbarino, M., Direct measurement of tree height provides different results on the assessment of LiDAR accuracy. Forests, 8, 2016, 7, 10.3390/f8010007.
29. da Silva, G.F., Curto, R.D.A., Soares, C.P.B., Piassi, L. de C., Evaluation of height measurement methods in natural forests. Rev. Árvore 36 (2012), 341–348, 10.1590/S0100-67622012000200015.
30. Tompalski, P., Coops, N.C., White, J.C., Wulder, M.A., Simulating the impacts of error in species and height upon tree volume derived from airborne laser scanning data. For. Ecol. Manag. 327 (2014), 167–177, 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.011.
31. Wang, Y., Hyyppä, J., Liang, X., Kaartinen, H., Yu, X., Lindberg, E., Holmgren, J., Qin, Y., Mallet, C., Ferraz, A., Torabzadeh, H., Morsdorf, F., Zhu, L., Liu, J., Alho, P., International benchmarking of the individual tree detection methods for modeling 3-D canopy structure for silviculture and forest ecology using airborne laser scanning. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 54 (2016), 5011–5027, 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2543225.
32. Wang, Y., Weinacker, H., Koch, B., A lidar point cloud based procedure for vertical canopy structure analysis and 3D single tree modelling in forest. Sensors 8 (2008), 3938–3951.
33. White, J.C., Coops, N.C., Wulder, M.A., Vastaranta, M., Hilker, T.H., Tompalski, P., 2016. Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: a review 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2016.1207484.
34. Wilkes, P., Jones, S.D., Suarez, L., Haywood, A., Woodgate, W., Soto-Berelov, M., Mellor, A., Skidmore, A.K., Understanding the effects of ALS pulse density for metric retrieval across diverse forest types. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 81 (2015), 625–635 https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.8.625.
35. Wulder, M.A., Coops, N.C., Hudak, A.T., Morsdorf, F., Nelson, R., Newnham, G., Vastaranta, M., Status and prospects for LiDAR remote sensing of forested ecosystems. Can. J. Remote Sens. 39 (2013), S1–S5, 10.5589/m13-051.
36. Yu, X., Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H., Maltamo, M., 2004. Effects of flight altitude on tree height estimation using airborne laser scanning. In: Int. Conf. NATSCAN Laser-Scanners For. Landsc. Assess. - Instrum. Process. Methods Appl. 3–6 Oct 2004 Freibg. Ger.
37. Zhao, K., Suarez, J.C., Garcia, M., Hu, T., Wang, C., Londo, A., Utility of multitemporal lidar for forest and carbon monitoring: tree growth, biomass dynamics, and carbon flux. Remote Sens. Environ. 204 (2018), 883–897, 10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.007.