Removing bias from LiDAR-based estimates of canopy height: Accounting for the effects of pulse density and footprint size

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 198, Issue , 2017, Pages 1-16

  Roussel, Jean Romain ^a   Caspersen, John ^b   Béland, Martin ^a   Thomas, Sean ^b   Achim, Alexis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canopy height; Footprint size; Forest inventory; LiDAR; LiDAR metrics; Pulse density; Stand structure

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; PROBABILITY;

CANOPY HEIGHTS; FOOTPRINT SIZE; FOREST INVENTORY; PULSE DENSITY; STAND STRUCTURES;

OPTICAL RADAR;

CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA SET; DENSITY; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; FOREST INVENTORY; GROWTH RESPONSE; LIDAR; SATELLITE DATA; STAND STRUCTURE;

EID: 85020003897     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.032     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andersen, H.-E., Reutebuch, S.E., McGaughey, R.J., A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 32:5 (2006), 355–366.
2. Anderson, E.S., Thompson, J.A., Crouse, D.A., Austin, R.E., Horizontal resolution and data density effects on remotely sensed LIDAR-based DEM. Geoderma 132:3-4 (2006), 406–415.
3. Anderson-Teixeira, K.J., Davies, S.J., Bennett, A.C., Gonzalez-Akre, E.B., Muller-Landau, H.C., Joseph Wright, S., Abu Salim, K., Almeyda Zambrano, A.M., Alonso, A., Baltzer, J.L., et al. Ctfs-forestgeo: a worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21:2 (2015), 528–549.
4. Asner, G.P., Mascaro, J., Mapping tropical forest carbon: calibrating plot estimates to a simple LiDAR metric. Remote Sens. Environ. 140 (2014), 614–624.
5. Bouvier, M., Durrieu, S., Fournier, R.A., Renaud, J.-P., Remote sensing of environment generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 156 (2015), 322–334.
6. Coomes, D.A., Dalponte, M., Jucker, T., Asner, G.P., Banin, L.F., Burslem, D.F.R.P., Lewis, S.L., Nilus, R., Phillips, O.L., Phua, M.-H., Qie, L., Area-based vs tree-centric approaches to mapping forest carbon in Southeast Asian forests from airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sens. Environ. 194 (2017), 77–88.
7. Dalponte, M., itcSegment: Individual Tree Crowns Segmentation. R Package Version 0.2. 2016.
8. Disney, M., Kalogirou, V., Lewis, P., Prieto-Blanco, A., Hancock, S., Pfeifer, M., Simulating the impact of discrete-return lidar system and survey characteristics over young conifer and broadleaf forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 114:7 (2010), 1546–1560.
9. Evans, D.L., Roberts, S.D., McCombs, J.W., Harrington, R.L., Detection of regularly spaced targets in small-footprint LIDAR data: research issues for consideration. Remote Sens. Environ. 67:October (2001), 1133–1136.
10. García, M., Riaño, D., Chuvieco, E., Danson, F.M., Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data. Remote Sens. Environ. 114:4 (2010), 816–830.
11. García, M., Riaño, D., Chuvieco, E., Salas, J., Danson, F.M., Multispectral and LiDAR data fusion for fuel type mapping using support vector machine and decision rules. Remote Sens. Environ. 115:6 (2011), 1369–1379.
12. Gatziolis, D., Andersen, H.-E., A Guide to LIDAR Data Acquisition and Processing for the Forests of the Pacific Northwest. 2008, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
13. Gobakken, T., Næsset, E., Assessing effects of laser point density, ground sampling intensity, and field sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data. Can. J. For. Res. 38:5 (2008), 1095–1109.
14. Goodwin, N., Coops, N., Culvenor, D., Development of a simulation model to predict LiDAR interception in forested environments. Remote Sens. Environ. 111:4 (2007), 481–492.
15. Hancock, S., Armston, J., Li, Z., Gaulton, R., Lewis, P., Disney, M., Danson, F.M., Strahler, A., Schaaf, C., Anderson, K., Gaston, K.J., Waveform lidar over vegetation: an evaluation of inversion methods for estimating return energy. Remote Sens. Lett. 164 (2015), 208–224.
16. Hansen, E.H., Gobakken, T., Næsset, E., Effects of pulse density on digital terrain models and canopy metrics using airborne laser scanning in a tropical rainforest. Remote Sens. 7:7 (2015), 8453–8468.
17. Hirata, Y., The effects of footprint size and sampling density in airborne laser scanning to extract individual trees in mountainous terrain. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 36:8 (2004), 102–107.
18. Höfle, B., Pfeifer, N., Correction of laser scanning intensity data: data and model-driven approaches. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 62:6 (2007), 415–433.
19. Holmgren, J., Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning. Scand. J. For. Res. 19:6 (2004), 543–553.
20. Ioki, K., Imanishi, J., Sasaki, T., Morimoto, Y., Kitada, K., Estimating stand volume in broad-leaved forest using discrete-return LiDAR: plot-based approach. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 6:1 (2009), 29–36.
21. Jakubowski, M.K., Guo, Q., Kelly, M., Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ. 130 (2013), 245–253.
22. Kane, V.R., McGaughey, R.J., Bakker, J.D., Gersonde, R.F., Lutz, J.A., Franklin, J.F., Comparisons between field- and LiDAR-based measures of stand structural complexity. Can. J. For. Res. 40:4 (2010), 761–773.
23. Kukko, A., Kaasalainen, S., Litkey, P., Effect of incidence angle on laser scanner intensity and surface data. Appl. Opt. 47 (2008), 986–992.
24. Kwak, D.-A., Lee, W.-K., Cho, H.-K., Lee, S.-H., Son, Y., Kafatos, M., Kim, S.-R., Estimating stem volume and biomass of Pinus koraiensis using LiDAR data. J. Plant Res. 123:4 (2010), 421–432.
25. Lim, K., Hopkinson, C., Treitz, P., Examining the effects of sampling point densities. For. Chron. 84:6 (2008), 876–885.
26. Lim, K., Treitz, P., Baldwin, K., Morrison, I., Green, J., Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 29:5 (2014), 658–678.
27. Lovell, J., Jupp, D., Newnham, G., Coops, N., Culvenor, D., Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval. For. Ecol. Manag. 214:1-3 (2005), 398–412.
28. Magnussen, S., Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., Reliability of LiDAR derived predictors of forest inventory attributes: a case study with Norway spruce. Remote Sens. Environ. 114:4 (2010), 700–712.
29. Magnusson, M., Fransson, J.E.S., Holmgren, J., Effects on estimation accuracy of forest variables using different pulse dens …. For. Sci. 53:6 (2007), 619–626.
30. Maltamo, M., Eerikäinen, K., Pitkänen, Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions. Remote Sens. Environ. 90:3 (2004), 319–330.
31. Morsdorf, F., Meier, E., Kötz, B., Itten, K.I., Dobbertin, M., Allgöwer, B., LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management. Remote Sens. Environ. 92:3 (2004), 353–362.
32. Næsset, E., Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 52:2 (1997), 49–56.
33. Næsset, E., Effects of different flying altitudes on biophysical stand properties estimated from canopy height and density measured with a small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Remote Sens. Environ. 91 (2004), 243–255.
34. Nilsson, M., Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system. Remote Sens. Environ. 56:1 (1996), 1–7.
35. Pirotti, F., Tarolli, P., Suitability of LiDAR point density and derived landform curvature maps for channel network extraction. Hydrol. Process. 24:9 (2010), 1187–1197.
36. Popescu, S.C., Estimating biomass of individual pine trees using airborne lidar. Biomass Bioenergy 31:9 (2007), 646–655.
37. Pyysalo, U., Hyyppä, H., Reconstructing tree crowns from laser scanner data for feature extraction. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 34 (2002), 218–221.
38. Core Team, R., R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2015, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
39. Reitberger, J., Schnörr, C., Krzystek, P., Stilla, U., 3D segmentation of single trees exploiting full waveform LIDAR data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 64:6 (2009), 561–574.
40. Roussel, J.-R., Auty, D., lidR: Airborne LiDAR Data Manipulations and Visualisation for Forestry Applications. R package version 1.0.2, 2016 https://github.com/Jean-Romain/lidR.
41. Ruiz, L.A., Hermosilla, T., Mauro, F., Godino, M., Analysis of the influence of plot size and LiDAR density on forest structure attribute estimates. Forests 5:5 (2014), 936–951.
42. Sadeghi, Y., St-Onge, B., Leblon, B., Simard, M., Canopy height model (CHM) derived from a TanDEM-X InSAR DSM and an airborne lidar DTM in boreal forest. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. and Remote Sens., 2015.
43. Singh, K.K., Chen, G., McCarter, J.B., Meentemeyer, R.K., Effects of LiDAR point density and landscape context on estimates of urban forest biomass. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 101 (2015), 310–322.
44. Thomas, V., Treitz, P., McCaughey, J.H., Morrison, I., Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: an examination of scanning density. Can. J. For. Res. 36:1 (2006), 34–47.
45. Van Leeuwen, M., Nieuwenhuis, M., Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing. Eur. J. For. Res. 129:4 (2010), 749–770.
46. Vega, C., Hamrouni, a., El Mokhtari, S., Morel, J., Bock, J., Renaud, J.-P., Bouvier, M., Durrieu, S., PTrees: a point-based approach to forest tree extraction from lidar data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 33 (2014), 98–108.
47. White, J.C., Wulder, M.A., Varhola, A., Vastaranta, M., Coops, N.C., Cook, B.D., Pitt, D., Woods, M., et al. A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach. For. Chron., 89(722723), 2013, 5.
48. Woods, M., Lim, K., Treitz, P., Predicting forest stand variables from LiDAR data in the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence forest of Ontario. For. Chron. 84:6 (2008), 827–839.
49. Woods, M., Pitt, D., Penner, M., Lim, K., Nesbitt, D., Etheridge, D., Treitz, P., Operational implementation of a lidar inventory in boreal Ontario. For. Chron. 87:4 (2011), 512–528.
50. Yao, W., Krzystek, P., Heurich, M., Tree species classification and estimation of stem volume and DBH based on single tree extraction by exploiting airborne full-waveform LiDAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 123 (2012), 368–380.
51. Zhao, K., Popescu, S., Nelson, R., Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass: a scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers. Remote Sens. Environ. 113:1 (2009), 182–196.