Dissecting the Attitudes of Political Science Students Towards Democracy and the 2004 Elections in Indonesia

Asian Journal of Political Science

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 259-281

  Tyson, Adam ^a   Tyson, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Authoritarian; Cognitive Dissonance; Corruption; Democracy; Elections

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055380986     PISSN: 02185377     EISSN: 17507812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02185370701731010     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bowen, J. R., 1986. ‘On the Political Construction of Tradition: Gotong Royong in Indonesia’. Journal of Asian Studies, 45 (3): 545–561.
2. Carter Centre (1999). ‘Postelection Statement on Indonesia Elections, June 9, 1999’, The Carter Centre. Available at: http://www.cartercenter.org/doc911.htm.
3. Clark, E., (2001). ‘Indonesia Economic Crisis Point’, BBC News Online, 23 July. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1304820.stm.
4. CNN (1999). ‘Indonesian Elections’, CNN.com. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/indonesian.elections.
5. Collins, E. F., 2002. ‘Indonesia: A Violent Culture?’. Asian Survey, 42 (4): 582–605.
6. Emmerson, D. K., 2004. ‘A Year of Voting Dangerously?’. Journal of Democracy, 15 (1): 94–108.
7. Eysenck, H. J., 1954. The Psychology of Politics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8. Festinger, L., 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, New York: Harper & Row.
9. Fiske, S. T., 2004. Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology, New York: Wiley.
10. Geertz, C., 1960. The Religion of Java, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
11. Hadiz, V. R., and Robison, R., 2005. ‘Neo-liberal Reforms and Illiberal Consolidations: The Indonesian Paradox’. Journal of Development Studies, 41 (2): 220–241.
12. Hall, G. C. N., and Barongan, C., 2002. Multicultural Psychology, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Huntington, S. P., 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
14. Hyden, G., Court, J., and Mease, K., 2004. Making Sense of Governance, London: Lynne Rienner.
15. Jost, J. T., and Hunyady, O., 2002. ‘The Psychology of System Justification and Palliative Function of Ideology’. European Review of Social Psychology, 13: 111–153.
16. Lagos, M., 2003. ‘World Opinion: Support for and Satisfaction with Democracy’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15: 471–487.
17. Lambsdorff, J. G., (2006). ‘Corruption Perceptions Index 2006’, Transparency International. Available at: http://www.transparency.org.htm.
18. Lieberman, M. D., Ochsner, K. N., Gilbert, D. T., and Schacter, D. L., 2001. ‘Do Amnesiacs Exhibit Cognitive Dissonance Reduction?’. Psychological Science, 12: 135–140.
19. Linz, J. J., and Stepan, A., 1996. Problems of Democratic Transitions and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post Communist Europe, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Lodge, M., and Taber, C. S., 2005. The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis’. Political Psychology, 26 (3): 455–482.
21. MacIntyre, A., 2001. “ Investment, Property Rights, and Corruption in Indonesia ”. In Corruption: The Boom and Bust of East Asia, Edited by: Campos, J. E., 1–20. Manila: Ateneo University Press.
22. Mayer, R., 2001. Strategies of Justification in Authoritarian Ideology’. Journal of Political Ideologies, 6: 147–168.
23. McLeod, R. H., (2000). ‘Soeharto's Indonesia: A Better Class of Corruption?’, The Indonesian Quarterly, XXVIII (1): 16–27.
24. McRae, D., (1999). ‘Mobilize or Perish’, Inside Indonesia, 59 (July–September). Available at: http://insideindonesia.org/content/view/661/29/
25. Moghadam, V. M., 2005. “ ‘Is Gender Inequality in Muslim Societies a Barrier to Modernization and Democratization?’ ”. In Modernization, Democracy, and Islam, Edited by: Hunter, S. T., and Malik, H., 98–114. Westport, CT: CSIS Praeger.
26. Qodari, M., 2005. ‘Indonesia's Quest for Accountable Governance’. Journal of Democracy, 16 (2): 73–87.
27. Ramage, D., 1995. Politics in Indonesia: Democracy, Islam and the Ideology of Tolerance, London: Routledge.
28. Ricklefs, M. C., 2001. A History of Modern Indonesia: ca 1300 to the Present, 3rd edn, New York: Palgrave and Stanford University Press.
29. Robertson-Snape, F., 1999. Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Indonesia’. Third World Quarterly, 20 (3): 589–602.
30. Tan, P. J., 2002. The Anti-party Reaction in Indonesia: Causes and Implications’. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 24: 484–508.
31. Thalang, C., na (2005). ‘The Presidential Elections in Indonesia, July and September 2004’, Electoral Studies, 24 (4): 741–784.
32. Tupai, R., (2006). ‘Another Election Official Jailed, Others Untouchable’, Paras Indonesia, 2 February. Available at: www.laksamana.net.
33. Tyson, A., 2003. ‘Realities of Discrimination in Indonesia: The Case of the Civil Service’. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 2 (2): 213–234.
34. Tyson, A., 2004. ‘Democratization and Insecurity in Indonesia’. Jurnal PACIS, 2 (1): 18–34.
35. Tyson, A., 2005a. ‘Decentralization and Adat in Indonesia’. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 1 (3): 265–281.
36. Tyson, A., 2005b. ‘Eliminating Indonesia's Fuel Subsidy’. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 4 (2): 145–161.
37. Vaughn, B., (2005). ‘Indonesian Elections. CRS Report for Congress’, Library of Congress, Code RS21874.
38. Voll, J. O., 2005. “ ‘Islam and Democracy: Is Modernization a Barrier?’ ”. In Modernization, Democracy, and Islam, Edited by: Hunter, S. T., and Malik, H., 82–97. Westport, CT: CSIS Praeger.
39. Volpi, F., 2004. ‘Pseudo-democracy in the Muslim World’. Third World Quarterly, 25 (6): 1061–1078.
40. Von der Mehden, F. R., 2005. “ Hindrances to Democracy and Modernization in Indonesia’ ”. In Modernization, Democracy, and Islam, Edited by: Hunter, S. T., and Malik, H., 221–234. Westport, CT: CSIS Praeger.
41. Webber, D., 2006. ‘A Consolidated Patrimonial Democracy? Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia’. Democratization, 13 (3): 396–420.
42. Weir, S., and Beetham, D., 1999. Political Power and Democratic Control in Britain: The Democratic Audit of the United Kingdom, London: Routledge.
43. Zaller, J. R., and Feldman, S., 1992. ‘A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences’. American Journal of Political Science, 36 (3): 579–616.