Teaching rime analogy or letter recoding reading strategies to prereaders: Effects on prereading skills and word reading

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 160-180

  Walton, Patrick D ^a   Walton, Lona M ^b   Felton, Kathy ^a  

^a THOMPSON RIVERS UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Box 3010 ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035583473     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.160     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baron, J. (1977). Mechanisms for pronouncing printed words: Use and acquisition. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 175-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bowey, J. A., Vaughn, L., & Hansen, J. (1998). Beginning readers' use of orthographic analogies in word reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 108-133.
3. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983, February). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
4. Brown, G. D., & Deavers, R. P. (1999). Units of analysis in nonword reading: Evidence from children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 208-242.
5. Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 104-111.
6. Deavers, R., & Solity, J. (1998). The role of rime units in reading. Educational and Child Psychology, 15, 6-17.
7. Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H., & Hill, S. (1997). How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63, 171-208.
8. Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 383-417). New York: Longman.
9. Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-41). London: Erlbaum.
10. Ehri, L. C., & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 12-26.
11. Glass, G. V. (1978). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 4, 351-379.
12. Goswami, U. (1991). Learning about spelling sequences: The role of onsets and rimes in analogies in reading. Child Development, 62, 1110-1123.
13. Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443-475.
14. Goswami, U. (1998). The role of analogies in the development of word recognition. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 41-63). London: Erlbaum.
15. Goswami, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: The importance of rhyme. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 111-134.
16. Goswami, U., & Brown, A. L. (1989). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition, 35, 69-95.
17. Greaney, K. T., & Tunmer, W. E. (1996). Onset/rime sensitivity and orthographic analogies in normal and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 15-40.
18. Greaney, K. T., Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (1997). Effects of rime-based orthographic analogy training on the word recognition skills of children with reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 645-651.
19. Haskell, D. W., Foorman, B. R., & Swank, P. R. (1992). Effects of three orthographic/phonological units on first-grade reading. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 40-49.
20. Hopkins, K. D. (1982). The unit of analysis: Group means versus individual observations. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 5-18.
21. Johnston, R. S., Anderson, M., & Holligan, C. (1996). Knowledge of the alphabet and explicit awareness of phonemes in pre-readers: The nature of the relationship. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 217-234.
22. Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3). London: Erlbaum.
23. Levy, B. A., Bourassa, D. C., & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 115-138.
24. Levy, B. A., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 359-387.
25. Metsala, J. L., & Ehri, L. C. (1998). Word recognition in beginning literacy. London: Erlbaum.
26. Murray, B. A. (1998). Gaining alphabetic insight: Is phoneme manipulation skill or identity knowledge causal? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 461-475.
27. Muter, V., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1994). Orthographic analogies and phonological awareness: Their role and significance in early reading development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 293-310.
28. Nation, K., & Hulme, C. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154-167.
29. Oakhill, J., & Beard, R. (Eds.). (1999). Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
30. O'Connor, R., & Jenkins, J. R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159-197.
31. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Peterson, M. E., & Haines, L. P. (1992). Orthographic analogy training with kindergarten children: Effects on analogy use, phonemic segmentation, and letter-sound knowledge. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 24, 109-127.
33. Qi, S., & O'Connor, R. (2000). A comparison of two phonological training procedures in Kindergarten classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 226-233.
34. Santa, C. M., & Hoein, T. (1999). An assessment of Early Steps: A program for early intervention of reading problems. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 54-73.
35. Seymour, P. H., & Evans, H. M. (1994). Levels of phonological awareness and learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 221-250.
36. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95-129.
37. Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1-57.
38. Sullivan, H. J., Okada, M., & Niedermeyer, F. D. (1971). Learning and transfer under two methods of word-attack instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 8, 227-239.
39. Torgesen, J. K., & Burgess, S. R. (1998). Consistency of reading-related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal, correctional, and instructional studies. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 161-189). London: Erlbaum.
40. Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., Rashotte, C., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
41. Vandervelden, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (1995). Phonological recoding and phoneme awareness in early literacy: A developmental approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 854-875.
42. Varnhagen, C. K., Boechler, P. M., & Steffler, D. (1999). Phonological and orthographic influences on children's vowel spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 363-379.
43. Walton, P. D. (1995). Rhyming ability, phoneme identity, letter-sound knowledge, and the use of orthographic analogy by prereaders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 587-597.
44. Walton, P. D., Bowden, M. E., Kurtz, S. L., & Angus, M. (in press). Evaluation of a rime-based reading program with Shuswap and Heiltsuk First Nations prereaders. Reading and Writing.
45. Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., & Treiman, R. (1990). Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction: Onset-rime vs. postvowel segmentation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 1-19.
46. Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159-176.