Product sustainability assessment for product life cycle

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 206, Issue , 2019, Pages 238-250

  He, Bin ^a   Luo, Ting ^a   Huang, Shan ^a  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Product sustainability assessment; Sustainability indicator; Sustainable design; Underactuated exoskeleton robotics

Indexed keywords

DIRECTED GRAPHS; ECODESIGN; EXOSKELETON (ROBOTICS); GRAPH THEORY; LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS; PRODUCT DESIGN; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; EVALUATION INDICATORS; HIERARCHICAL EVALUATION SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS; UNDERACTUATED; WEIGHT DETERMINATION;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 85054873184     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.097     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ajukumar, V.N., Gandhi, O.P., Evaluation of green maintenance initiatives in design and development of mechanical systems using an integrated approach. J. Clean. Prod. 51 (2013), 34–46.
2. Anand, A., Wani, M.F., Product life-cycle modeling and evaluation at the conceptual design stage: a digraph and matrix approach. ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(9), 2010 091010.
3. Bevilacqua, M., Braglia, M., The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 70:1 (2000), 71–83.
4. Caiado, R.G.G., de Freitas Dias, R., Mattos, L.V., Quelhas, O.L.G., Leal Filho, W., Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 165 (2017), 890–904.
5. Clavreul, J., Baumeister, H., Christensen, T.H., Damgaard, A., An environmental assessment system for environmental technologies. Environ. Model. Software 60 (2014), 18–30.
6. Devanathan, S., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W.Z., Zhao, F., Ramani, K., Integration of sustainability into early design through the function impact matrix. ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(8), 2010 081004.
7. Dong, Y.C., Chen, Y.H., Wang, S., Algorithms of forming hierarchy for multi-attribute decision making and their applications. Control Decis. 20:4 (2005), 403–407.
8. Dyllick, T., Rost, Z., Towards true product sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 162:20 (2017), 346–360.
9. Eddy, D., Krishnamurty, S., Grosse, I., Witherell, P., Wileden, J., Lewis, K., An integrated approach to information modeling for the sustainable design of products. ASME J. Inf. Sci. Eng., 14(2), 2014, 021011.
10. Gao, Y., Xia, Y., Wu, S., Qiao, J., Solution to gang crime based on graph theory and analytical hierarchy process. Neurocomputing 140 (2014), 121–127.
11. Gao, Z.G., Zeng, L.B., He, B., Luo, T., Zhang, P.C., Type synthesis of non-holonomic spherical constraint underactuated parallel robotics. Acta Astronaut., 2018, 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.08.050.
12. Ghadimi, P., Azadnia, A.H., Yusof, N.M., Saman, M.Z.M., A weighted fuzzy approach for product sustainability assessment: a case study in automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod. 33 (2012), 10–21.
13. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental, and Social Performance. 2000 http://www.globalreporting.org/.
14. Goedkoop, M., Demmers, M., Collignon, M., Eco Indicator 95: Manual for Designer. 1996, Product Ecology Consultants (PRé), Netherlands.
15. He, B., Deng, Z., Huang, S., Wang, J., Application of unascertained number for the integration of carbon footprint in conceptual design. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 229:11 (2015), 2088–2092.
16. He, B., Gu, Z.C., Sustainable design synthesis for product environmental footprints. Des. Stud. 45 (2016), 159–186.
17. He, B., Hua, Y., Feature-based integrated product model for low-carbon conceptual design. J. Eng. Des. 28:6 (2017), 408–432.
18. He, B., Huang, S., Wang, J., Product low-carbon design using dynamic programming algorithm. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. G.T. 2:1 (2015), 37–42.
19. He, B., Niu, Y., Hou, S., Li, F., Sustainable design from functional domain to physical domain. J. Clean. Prod. 197 (2018), 1296–1306.
20. He, B., Pan, Q.J., Deng, Z.Q., Product carbon footprint for product life cycle under uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 187 (2018), 459–472.
21. He, B., Tang, W., Huang, S., Hou, S.C., Cai, H.X., Towards low-carbon product architecture using structural optimization for lightweight. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 83:5–8 (2016), 1419–1429.
22. He, B., Tang, W., Wang, J., Product model integrated with carbon footprint for low-carbon design. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Man. 16:11 (2015), 2383–2388.
23. He, B., Tang, W., Wang, J., Huang, S., Deng, Z., Wang, Y., Low-carbon conceptual design based on product life cycle assessment. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 81:5–8 (2015), 863–874.
24. He, B., Wang, J., Deng, Z., Cost-constrained low-carbon product design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 79 (2015), 1821–1828.
25. He, B., Wang, J., Huang, S., Wang, Y., Low-carbon product design for product life cycle. J. Eng. Des. 26:10–12 (2015), 321–339.
26. He, B., Xiao, J., Deng, Z., Product design evaluation for product environmental footprint. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018), 3066–3080.
27. Hemdi, A.R., Mat Saman, M.Z., Sharif, S., Sustainability evaluation using fuzzy inference methods. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 32:3 (2013), 169–185.
28. Huisingh, D., Zhang, Z., Moore, J.C., Qiao, Q., Li, Q., Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 103 (2015), 1–12.
29. Hu, Y.C., Recommendation using neighborhood methods with preference-relation-based similarity. Inf. Sci. 284 (2014), 18–30.
30. International Organization for Standardization (ISO 14031), Environmental Management-environmental Performance Evaluation-guidelines. 2013, ISO, Geneva.
31. Jain, R., Sustainability: metrics, specific indicators and preference index. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 7 (2005), 71–72.
32. Jangra, K., Grover, S., Aggarwal, A., Digraph and matrix method for the performance evaluation of carbide compacting die manufactured by wire EDM. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 54:5–8 (2011), 579–591.
33. Jeong, I.T., Lee, K.M., Assessment of the ecodesign improvement options using the global warming and economic performance indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009), 1206–1213.
34. Jeswiet, J., Kara, S., Carbon emissions and CESTM in manufacturing. CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 57:1 (2008), 17–20.
35. Khan, F.I., Sadiq, R., Veitch, B., Life cycle iNdeX (LInX): a new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making. J. Clean. Prod. 12 (2004), 59–76.
36. Khoshnevisan, B., Bolandnazar, E., Shamshirband, S., Shariati, H.M., Anuar, N.B., Kiah, M.L.M., Decreasing environmental impacts of cropping systems using life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-objective genetic algorithm. J. Clean. Prod. 86 (2015), 67–77.
37. Krajnc, D., Glavic, P., Indicators of sustainable production. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 5 (2003), 279–288.
38. Luttropp, D.C., Lagerstedt, J., Ecological design and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. J. Clean. Prod. 14 (2006), 1396–1408.
39. Ma, J., Kremer, G.E.O., A fuzzy logic-based approach to determine product component end-of-life option from the views of sustainability and designer's perception. J. Clean. Prod. 108 (2015), 289–300.
40. Maxwell, D., van der Vorst, R., Developing sustainable products and services. J. Clean. Prod. 11 (2003), 883–895.
41. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), OECD Work on Sustainable Development. A Discussion Paper on Work to Be Undertaken over the Period 1998–2001. 1998 http://www.oecd.org/subject/sustdev/oecdwork.htm.
42. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), An Update of the OECD Composite Leading Indicators. Short-term Economic Statistics Division, Statistics Directorate/OECD. 2002 Available at: http://www.oecd.org.
43. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C.M., Ormston, R., (eds.) Qualitative Research Practice: a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, 2013, Sage Publications.
44. Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K., Dikshit, A.K., An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Indicat. 9 (2009), 189–212.
45. Svalina, I., Galzina, V., Lujić R., ŠImunović G., An adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for the forecasting: the case of close price indices. Expert Syst. Appl. 40:15 (2013), 6055–6063.
46. Thoresen, J., Environmental performance evaluation—a tool for industrial improvement. J. Clean. Prod. 7:5 (1999), 365–370.
47. US Interagency Working Group on Sustainable Development Indicators (USIWGSDI), An Experimental Set of Indicators. 1998, US Interagency Working Group on Sustainable Development Indicators, Washington DC 1998.
48. Wang, L.F., Xu, S.B., Introduction to Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1989, Renmin University of China Press, Beijing.
49. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Signals of Change: Business Progress toward Sustainable Development. Geneva, Switzerland. 1997.
50. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Eco-efficiency Indicators and Reporting. Report on the Status of the Project's Work in Progress and Guidelines for Pilot Application. Geneva, Switzerland., 1999.