Enhancing diversity to reduce health information disparities and build an evidence base for genomic medicine

Personalized Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 403-412

  Hindorff, Lucia A ^a   Bonham, Vence L ^a   Ohno Machado, Lucila ^b  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

diversity; ethnicity; evidence base; health disparities; health information disparities; healthcare disparities; knowledge base; learning healthcare system; LHS; race

Indexed keywords

ETHNICITY; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE BASE; LEARNING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; RACE; REVIEW; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; EDUCATION; ETHNIC GROUP; ETHNOLOGY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MINORITY GROUP; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

CULTURAL DIVERSITY; ETHNIC GROUPS; GENOMICS; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; MINORITY GROUPS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PRECISION MEDICINE;

EID: 85054653560     PISSN: 17410541     EISSN: 1744828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/pme-2018-0037     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Institute of Medicine. Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. (2012). http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/reports/2012/best-care-at-lower-cost-The-path-to-continuously-learning-health-ca re-in-america.aspx? ga=2.107080322.1425325668.1523676108-345200952.1516806198
2. Friedman C, Rubin J, Brown J et al. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning learning health system. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 22(1), 43-50 (2015).
3. Fisher ES, Shortell SM, Savitz LA. Implementation science: a potential catalyst for delivery system reform. JAMA 315(4), 339-340 (2016).
4. Chambers DA, Feero WG, Khoury MJ. Convergence of implementation science, precision medicine, and the learning health care system: a new model for biomedical research. JAMA 315(18), 1941-1942 (2016).
5. Popejoy AB, Fullerton SM. Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature 538(7624), 161-164 (2016).
6. Morales J, Welter D, Bowler EH et al. A standardized framework for representation of ancestry data in genomics studies, with application to the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog. Genome Biol. 19(1), 21 (2018).
7. Roundtable on the Promotion of Health Equity and the Elimination of Health Disparities. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Strategies for Ensuring Diversity, Inclusion, and Meaningful Participation in Clinical Trials: Proceedings of a Workshop. (2016). www.nap.edu/catalog/23530/strategies-f or-ensuring-diversity-inclusion-and-meaningf ul-participation-in-clinical-trials
8. Petrovski S, Goldstein DB. Unequal representation of genetic variation across ancestry groups creates healthcare inequality in the application of precision medicine. Genome Biol. 17(1), 157 (2016).
9. Landry LG, Rehm HL. Association of racial/ethnic categories with the ability of genetic tests to detect a cause of cardiomyopathy. JAMA Cardiol. 3(4), 341-345, (2018).
10. Landry LG, Ali N, Williams DR, Rehm HL, Bonham VL. Lack of diversity in genomic databases is a barrier to translating precision medicine research into practice. Health Affairs 37(5), 780-785 (2018).
11. Manrai AK, Funke BH, Rehm HL et al. Genetic misdiagnoses and the potential for health disparities.N. Engl. J. Med. 375(7), 655-665 (2016).
12. Williams JS, Walker RJ, Egede LE. Achieving equity in an evolving healthcare system: opportunities and challenges. Am. J. Med. Sci. 351(1), 33-43 (2016).
13. Adler NE, Glymour MM, Fielding J. Addressing social determinants of health and health inequalities. JAMA 316(16), 1641-1642 (2016).
14. Zoghbi HY, Beaudet AL. Epigenetics and human disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8(2), a019497 (2016).
15. Zhang X, Perez-Stable EJ, Bourne PE et al. Big Data Science: opportunities and challenges to address minority health and health disparities in the 21st century. Ethn. Dis. 27(2), 95-106 (2017).
16. Douglas MD, Dawes DE, Holden KB, Mack D. Missed policy opportunities to advance health equity by recording demographic data in electronic health records. Am. J. Public Health 105(Suppl. 3), S380-388 (2015).
17. Blizinsky KD, Bonham VL. Leveraging the learning health care model to improve equity in the age of genomic medicine. Learn Health Syst. 2(1), pii: e10046 (2018).
18. Committee on the Recommended Social and Behavioral Domains and Measures for Electronic Health Records, Institute of Medicine. Capturing social and behavioral domains in electronic health records: Phase I. (2014). www.nap.edu/catalog/18709/capturing-social-and-behavioral-domains-in-electronic-health-records-phase
19. Committee on the Recommended Social and Behavioral Domains and Measures for Electronic Health Records, Institute of Medicine. Capturing social and behavioral domains and measures in electronic health records: Phase II. (2015). www.nap.edu/catalog/18709/capturing-social-and-behavioral-domains-in-electronic-health-records-phase
20. Bernstein JA, Friedman C, Jacobson P, Rubin JC. Ensuring public health's future in a national-scale learning health system. Am. J. Prev. Med. 48(4), 480-487 (2015).
21. Association of American Medical Colleges. Community partnership for patient access to supportive services (ComPPASS). www.aamc.org/initiatives/rocc/363102/yaleprojectdescription.html
22. Nath JB, Costigan S, Hsia RY. Changes in demographics of patients seen at federally qualified health centers, 2005-2014. JAMA Intern. Med. 176(5), 712-714 (2016).
23. Lee ET, Welty TK, Fabsitz R et al. The Strong Heart Study. A study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians: design and methods. Am. J. Epidemiol. 132(6), 1141-1155 (1990).
24. Sorlie PD, Aviles-Santa LM, Wassertheil-Smoller S et al. Design and implementation of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Ann. Epidemiol. 20(8), 629-641 (2010).
25. National Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health: All of Us Research Program. (2018). https://allofus.nih.gov/
26. Wojick GGM, Nishimura KK, Tao R et al. Genetic diversity turns a new PAGE in our understanding of complex traits. (2017). www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/09/15/188094
27. National Institutes of Health. Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER2)-Clinical Sites with Enhanced Diversity (U01). (2016). https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rf a-files/RFA-HG-16-011.html
28. Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research I. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 312(15), 1513-1514 (2014).
29. Chute CG, Ullman-Cullere M, Wood GM, Lin SM, He M, Pathak J. Some experiences and opportunities for big data in translational research. Genet. Med. 15(10), 802-809 (2013).
30. Shirts BH, Salama JS, Aronson SJ et al. CSER and eMERGE: current and potential state of the display of genetic information in the electronic health record. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 22(6), 1231-1242 (2015).
31. Schildcrout JS, Denny JC, Bowton E et al. Optimizing drug outcomes through pharmacogenetics: a case for preemptive genotyping. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 92(2), 235-242 (2012).
32. Dunnenberger HM, Crews KR, Hoffman JM et al. Preemptive clinical pharmacogenetics implementation: current programs in five US medical centers. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 55, 89-106 (2015).
33. Wang S, Jiang X, Singh S et al. Genome privacy: challenges, technical approaches to mitigate risk, and ethical considerations in the United States. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1387(1), 73-83 (2017).
34. Sanderson SC, Brothers KB, Mercaldo ND et al. Public attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobank research: a large multi-site experimental survey in the US. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100(3), 414-427 (2017).
35. Nodora JN, Komenaka IK, Bouton ME et al. Biospecimen sharing among hispanic women in a safety-net clinic: implications for the precision medicine initiative. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 109(2) (2017). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw201.).
36. Kim H, Bell E, Kim J et al. iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(2), 380-387 (2017).
37. Weinfurt KP, Hernandez AF, Coronado GD et al. Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: generalizable lessons from the NIH collaboratory. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 17(1), 144 (2017).
38. Bothwell LE, Greene JA, Podolsky SH, Jones DS. Assessing the gold standard-lessons from the history of RCTs. N. Engl. J. Med. 374(22), 2175-2181 (2016).
39. Stronks K, Wieringa NF, Hardon A. Confronting diversity in the production of clinical evidence goes beyond merely including under-represented groups in clinical trials. Trials 14, 177 (2013).
40. Petticrew M. 'More research needed': plugging gaps in the evidence base on health inequalities. Eur. J. Public Health 17(5), 411-413 (2007).
41. Horwitz RI, Hayes-Conroy A, Caricchio R, Singer BH. From evidence based medicine to medicine based evidence. Am. J. Med. 130(11), 1246-1250 (2017).
42. Committee on the Evidence Base for Genetic Testing, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. An evidence framework for genetic testing. (2017). www.nap.edu/catalog/24632/an-evidence-framework-for-genetic-testing
43. Denny JC, Van Driest SL, Wei WQ, Roden DM. The influence of big (clinical) data and genomics on precision medicine and drug development. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 103(3), 409-418 (2018).
44. Chen MS Jr, Lara PN, Dang JH, Paterniti DA, Kelly K. Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials. Cancer 120(Suppl. 7), 1091-1096 (2014).
45. Beck AF, Sandel MT, Ryan PH, Kahn RS. Mapping neighborhood health geomarkers to clinical care decisions to promote equity in child health. Health Aff. (Millwood) 36(6), 999-1005 (2017).
46. Garrido T, Kanter M, Meng D et al. Race/ethnicity, personal health record access, and quality of care. Am. J. Manag. Care 21(2), e103-e113 (2015).
47. Weber GM, Adams WG, Bernstam EV et al. Biases introduced by filtering electronic health records for patients with 'complete data'. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(6), 1134-1141 (2017).
48. Lu CY, Williams MS, Ginsburg GS, Toh S, Brown JS, Khoury MJ. A proposed approach to accelerate evidence generation for genomic-based technologies in the context of a learning health system. Genet. Med. 20(4), 390-396 (2018).
49. Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 372(9), 793-795 (2015).
50. Chen F, Jiang X, Wang S et al. Perfectly secure and efficient two-party electronic-health-record linkage. IEEE Internet Comput. 22(2), 32-41 (2018).
51. Kum HC, Krishnamurthy A, Machanavajjhala A, Reiter MK, Ahalt S. Privacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL). J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 21(2), 212-220 (2014).
52. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
53. Hollister BM, Restrepo NA, Farber-Eger E, Crawford DC, Aldrich MC, Non A. Development and performance of text-mining algorithms to extract socioeconomic status from de-identified electronic health records. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 22, 230-241 (2017).
54. Bush WS, Crawford DC, Briggs F, Freedman D, Sloan C. Integrating community-level data resources for precision medicine research. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 23, 618-622 (2018).
55. Oreskovic NM, Maniates J, Weilburg J, Choy G. Optimizing the use of electronic health records to identify high-risk psychosocial determinants of health. JMIR Med. Inform. 5(3), e25 (2017).
56. Dyke SO, Dove ES, Knoppers BM. Sharing health-related data: a privacy test? NPJ Genom. Med. 1(1), 160241-160246 (2016).
57. Regulatory, Ethics Working Group, Global Alliance for Genomics Health, Sugano S. International code of conduct for genomic and health-related data sharing. Hugo J. 8(1), 1 (2014).
58. Shabani M, Borry P. Rules for processing genetic data for research purposes in view of the new EU General Data Protection Regulation. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 26(2), 149-156 (2018).
59. Lee SS, Kelley M, Cho MK et al. Adrift in the gray zone: IRB perspectives on research in the learning health system. AJOB Empir. Bioeth. 7(2), 125-134 (2016).
60. Gaziano JM, Concato J, Brophy M et al. Million Veteran Program: a mega-biobank to study genetic influences on health and disease. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 70, 214-223 (2016).