Erratum to: Principles of nucleosome organization revealed by single-cell micrococcal nuclease sequencing (Nature, (2018), 562, 7726, (281-285), 10.1038/s41586-018-0567-3);Principles of nucleosome organization revealed by single-cell micrococcal nuclease sequencing

Nature

Volumn 562, Issue 7726, 2018, Pages 281-285

  Lai, Binbin ^a   Gao, Weiwu ^a,b   Cui, Kairong ^a   Xie, Wanli ^a,c   Tang, Qingsong ^a   Jin, Wenfei ^d   Hu, Gangqing ^a   Ni, Bing ^b   Zhao, Keji ^a  

^a NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; MICROCOCCAL NUCLEASE; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I;

CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL POPULATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HETEROCHROMATIN; HISTONE MODIFICATION; HUMAN; LETTER; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; NIH 3T3 CELL LINE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; T CELL DEPLETION; 3T3 CELL LINE; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; CELL CULTURE; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; ENHANCER REGION; EUCHROMATIN; GENE SILENCING; GENETICS; GENOME; MALE; METABOLISM; MOUSE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; ANIMAL CELL; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; SILENT GENE; SINGLE CELL MICROCOCCAL NUCLEASE SEQUENCING;

3T3 CELLS; ANIMALS; CD4-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELLS, CULTURED; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; EUCHROMATIN; GENE SILENCING; GENOME; HETEROCHROMATIN; MALE; MICE; MICROCOCCAL NUCLEASE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; NUCLEOSOMES; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

EID: 85054652069     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0690-1     Document Type: Erratum

References (29)

1. Shivaswamy, S. et al. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol. 6, e65 (2008).
2. Lam, F. H., Steger, D. J. & O’Shea, E. K. Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range. Nature 453, 246–250 (2008).
3. Schones, D. E. et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132, 887–898 (2008).
4. Albert, I. et al. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 446, 572–576 (2007).
5. Mavrich, T. N. et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res. 18, 1073–1083 (2008).
6. Mavrich, T. N. et al. Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome. Nature 453, 358–362 (2008).
7. Gaffney, D. J. et al. Controls of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003036 (2012).
8. Tang, F. et al. mRNA-seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).
9. Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015).
10. Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. Nature 523, 486–490 (2015).
11. Cusanovich, D. A. et al. Multiplex single cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science 348, 910–914 (2015).
12. Jin, W. et al. Genome-wide detection of DNase I hypersensitive sites in single cells and FFPE tissue samples. Nature 528, 142–146 (2015).
13. Kaplan, N., Hughes, T. R., Lieb, J. D., Widom, J. & Segal, E. Contribution of histone sequence preferences to nucleosome organization: proposed definitions and methodology. Genome Biol. 11, 140 (2010).
14. Valouev, A. et al. Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature 474, 516–520 (2011).
15. Zhang, Z. et al. A packing mechanism for nucleosome organization reconstituted across a eukaryotic genome. Science 332, 977–980 (2011).
16. Brogaard, K., Xi, L., Wang, J. P. & Widom, J. A map of nucleosome positions in yeast at base-pair resolution. Nature 486, 496–501 (2012).
17. Valouev, A. et al. A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. Genome Res. 18, 1051–1063 (2008).
18. Hughes, A. L., Jin, Y., Rando, O. J. & Struhl, K. A functional evolutionary approach to identify determinants of nucleosome positioning: a unifying model for establishing the genome-wide pattern. Mol. Cell 48, 5–15 (2012).
19. Teif, V. B. et al. Genome-wide nucleosome positioning during embryonic stem cell development. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1185–1192 (2012).
20. Szerlong, H. J. & Hansen, J. C. Nucleosome distribution and linker DNA: connecting nuclear function to dynamic chromatin structure. Biochem. Cell Biol. 89, 24–34 (2011).
21. Ito, T., Bulger, M., Pazin, M. J., Kobayashi, R. & Kadonaga, J. T. ACF, an ISWI-containing and ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor. Cell 90, 145–155 (1997).
22. Fan, Y. et al. Histone H1 depletion in mammals alters global chromatin structure but causes specific changes in gene regulation. Cell 123, 1199–1212 (2005).
23. Öberg, C., Izzo, A., Schneider, R., Wrange, Ö. & Belikov, S. Linker histone subtypes differ in their effect on nucleosomal spacing in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 419, 183–197 (2012).
24. Hartley, P. D. & Madhani, H. D. Mechanisms that specify promoter nucleosome location and identity. Cell 137, 445–458 (2009).
25. Hu, G. et al. Regulation of nucleosome landscape and transcription factor targeting at tissue-specific enhancers by BRG1. Genome Res. 21, 1650–1658 (2011).
26. Yue, F. et al. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature 515, 355–364 (2014).
27. Maurano, M. T. et al. Large-scale identification of sequence variants influencing human transcription factor occupancy in vivo. Nat. Genet. 47, 1393–1401 (2015).
28. Tolstorukov, M. Y., Volfovsky, N., Stephens, R. M. & Park, P. J. Impact of chromatin structure on sequence variability in the human genome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 510–515 (2011).
29. Rotem, A. et al. Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1165–1172 (2015).