Digital service platform evolution: How spotify leveraged boundary resources to become a global leader in music streaming

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 2018-January, Issue , 2018, Pages 4564-4573

  Skog, Daniel A ^a   Wimelius, Henrik ^a   Sandberg, Johan ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SERVICE INDUSTRY;

DIGITAL PLATFORMS; DIGITAL SERVICES; DISTRIBUTION MECHANISM; EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; INDUSTRY ARCHITECTURE; LONGITUDINAL CASE STUDY; MUSIC STREAMING;

DIGITAL DEVICES;

EID: 85054272923     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Barrett, M., E. Davidson, J. Prabhu, and S.L. Vargo, “Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions”, MIS Quarterly 39(1), 2015, pp. 135–154.
2. Basole, R.C., “Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem”, Journal of Information Technology 24(2), 2009, pp. 144–159.
3. Basole, R.C., and J. Karla, “On the Evolution of Mobile Platform Ecosystem Structure and Strategy”, Business and Information Systems Engineering 3(5), 2011, pp. 313–322.
4. Boudreau, K.J., “Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software App Developers and Patterns of Innovation”, Organization Science 23(5), 2012, pp. 1409–1427.
5. Eaton, B., S. Elauf-Calderwood, C. Sørensen, and Y. Yoo, “Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple’s iOS Service System”, MIS Quarterly 39(1), 2015, pp. 217–243.
6. Ellis, M., S.D. Strowes, and C. Perkins, “An Experimental Study of Client-Side Spotify Peering Behaviour”, IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, (2011), 267–270.
7. Gawer, A., “Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework”, Research Policy 43(7), 2014, pp. 1239–1249.
8. Ghazawneh, A., and O. Henfridsson, “Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model”, Information Systems Journal 23(2), 2013, pp. 173–192.
9. Goldmann, M., and G. Kreitz, “Measurements on the spotify peer-assisted music-on-demand streaming system”, IEEE International Conference on P2P Computing, (2011), 206–211.
10. Huang, J., O. Henfridsson, M.J. Liu, and S. Newell, “Growing on Steroids: Rapidly Scaling the User Base of Digital Ventures Through Digital Innovation”, MIS Quarterly 41(1), 2017, pp. 301–314.
11. Kreitz, G., and F. Niemela, “Spotify–large scale, low latency, P2P music-on-demand streaming”, IEEE International Conference on P2P Computing, (2010), 1–10.
12. Langley, A., “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data”, The Academy of Management Review 24(4), 1999, pp. 691–710.
13. Lee, J., and N. Berente, “Digital Innovation and the Division of Innovative Labor: Digital Controls in the Automotive Industry”, Organization Science 23(5), 2012, pp. 1428–1447.
14. Lusch, R.F., and S. Nambisan, “Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective”, MIS Quarterly 39(1), 2015, pp. 155–175.
15. Ostrom, A.L., M.J. Bitner, S.W. Brown, et al., “Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service”, Journal of Service Research 13(1), 2010, pp. 4–36.
16. Ostrom, A.L., A. Parasuraman, D.E. Bowen, L. Patrício, and C.A. Voss, “Service Research Priorities in a Rapidly Changing Context”, Journal of Service Research 18(2), 2015, pp. 127–159.
17. Poole, M.S., A.H.V. de Ven, K. Dooley, and M.E. Holmes, Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research, Oxford University Press, 2000.
18. de Reuver, M., C. Sørensen, and R.C. Basole, “The digital platform: a research agenda”, Journal of Information Technology, 2017.
19. Scherer, A., N.V. Wünderlich, and F. von Wangenheim, “The Value of Self-Service: Long-Term Effects of Technology-Based Self-Service Usage on Customer Retention”, MIS Quarterly 39(1), 2015, pp. 177–200.
20. Thomas, L.D.W., E. Autio, and D.M. Gann, “Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context”, Academy of Management Perspectives 28(2), 2014, pp. 198–219.
21. Tilson, D., K. Lyytinen, and C. Sorensen, “Research Commentary-Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda”, Information Systems Research 21(4), 2010, pp. 748–759.
22. Tiwana, A., B. Konsynski, and A.A. Bush, “Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics”, Information Systems Research 21(4), 2010, pp. 675–687.
23. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, SAGE Publications, 2013.
24. Yoo, Y., O. Henfridsson, and K. Lyytinen, “The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research”, Information Systems Research 21(4), 2010, pp. 724–735.