Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 147, Issue 12, 2018, Pages 1865-1880

  Pennycook, Gordon ^a   Cannon, Tyrone D ^a   Rand, David G ^a,b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fake news; Fluency; Illusory truth effect; News media; Social media

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DECEPTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; POLITICS; SOCIAL MEDIA; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PERCEPTION; POLITICS; SOCIAL MEDIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85053713255     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000465     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election (NBER Working Paper No. 23098). Retrieved from http:// www.nber.org/papers/w23089
2. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
3. Arkes, H. R., Boehm, L. E., & Xu, G. (1991). Determinants of judged validity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 576-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90026-3
4. Arkes, H. R., Hackett, C., & Boehm, L. (1989). The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 81-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960020203
5. Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241
6. Beck, J. (2017, March 13). This article won't change your mind: The fact on why facts alone can't fight false beliefs. Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/03/this-article-wontchange-your-mind/519093/
7. Begg, I. M., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446
8. Berinsky, A. A. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47, 241-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000186
9. Calvert, D. (2017, March 6). The psychology behind fake news: Cognitive biases help explain our polarized media climate. Retrieved from https:// insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/the-psychology-behind-fakenews
10. Coppock, A. (2016). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on Mechanical Turk: A replication approach. Retrieved from https:// alexandercoppock.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/coppock_generalizability2.pdf
11. Corlett, P. R., Krystal, J. H., Taylor, J. R., & Fletcher, P. C. (2009). Why do delusions persist? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.012.2009
12. Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088 868309352251
13. Diana, R., Yonelinas, A., & Ranganath, C. (2007). Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three-component model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 379-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.001
14. Ecker, U. K. H., Hogan, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction? Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 6, 185-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.014
15. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. W. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1087-1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/ MC.38.8.1087
16. Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 993-1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ xge0000098
17. Flynn, D., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Advances in Political Psychology, 38(S1), 127-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394
18. Gabielkov, M., Ramachandran, A., Chaintreau, A., & Legout, A. (2016). Social clicks: What and who gets read on Twitter? Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2901462
19. Goldman, R. (2016, December 24). Reading fake news, Pakistani minister directs nuclear threat at Israel. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/24/world/asia/pakistan-israelkhawaja-asif-fake-news-nuclear.html
20. Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2016). News use across social media platforms 2016. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-useacross-social-media-platforms-2016/
21. Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77) 80012-1
22. Hawkins, S., & Hoch, S. (1992). Low-involvement learning: Memory without evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 212-225. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1086/209297
23. Horton, J., Rand, D., & Zeckhauser, R. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9
24. Johar, G., & Roggeveen, A. (2007). Changing false beliefs from repeated advertising: The role of claim-refutation alignment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 118-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408 (07)70018-9
25. Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407-424
26. Kahan, D. M. (2017, May 24). Misconceptions, misinformation, and the logic of identity-protective cognition (Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper Series No. 164; Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 605; Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 575). Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2973067
27. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547
28. Krupnikov, Y., & Levine, A. (2014). Cross-sample comparisons and external validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1, 59-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/xps.2014.7
29. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
30. Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359, 1094-1096. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
31. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
32. Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968
33. Mosseri, A. (2016, June 29). Building a better news feed for you. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/06/building-a-better-newsfeed-for-you/
34. Mullinix, K., Leeper, T., Druckman, J., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2, 109-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2015.19
35. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
36. Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001
37. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. (2017). The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news stories increases perceived accuracy of stories without warnings. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=3035384
38. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018a). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
39. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018b). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=3023545
40. Polage, D. C. (2012). Making up history: False memories of fake news stories. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 8, 245-250. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5964/ejop.v8i2.456
41. Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008
42. Redlawsk, D. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64, 1021-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00161
43. Sanford, N., Veckenstedt, R., Moritz, S., Balzan, R. P., & Woodward, T. S. (2014). Impaired integration of disambiguating evidence in delusional schizophrenia patients. Psychological Medicine, 44, 2729-2738. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714000397
44. Schwartz, M. (1982). Repetition and rated truth value of statements. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 393-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1422132
45. Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 127-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X
46. Shane, S. (2017, January 18). From headline to photograph, a fake news masterpiece. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/ 2017/01/18/us/fake-news-hillary-clinton-cameron-harris.html
47. Silverman, C., Strapagiel, L., Shaban, H., & Hall, E. (2016, October 20). Hyperpartisan Facebook pages are publishing false and misleading information at an alarming rate. Buzzfeed News. Retrieved from https:// www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/partisan-fb-pages-analysis
48. Singal, J. (2017, January 27). This is a great psychological framework for understanding how fake news spreads. New York Magazine. Retrieved from http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2017/01/a-great-psychologicalframework-for-understanding-fake-news.html
49. Skurnik, I., Yoon, C., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/426605
50. Swire, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 160802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160802
51. Swire, B., Ecker, U. K. H., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1948-1961. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000422
52. Tauber, S., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. (2013). General knowledge norms: Updated and expanded from the Nelson and Narens (1980) norms. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1115-1143. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/ s13428-012-0307-9
53. Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 219-230. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219
54. Unkelbach, C., & Rom, S. (2017). A referential theory of the repetitioninduced truth effect. Cognition, 160, 110-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.016
55. Wang, W.-C., Brashier, N. M., Wing, E. A., Marsh, E. J., & Cabeza, R. (2016). On known unknowns: Fluency and the neural mechanisms of illusory truth. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 739-746. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00923
56. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
57. Whittlesea, B. W. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235-1253. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235
58. Yonelinas, A. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
59. Yonelinas, A., & Jacoby, L. (2012). The process-dissociation approach two decades later: Convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions. Memory & Cognition, 40, 663-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0205-5
60. Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ h0025848
61. Zajonc, R. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154