Effect of linked rules on business process model understanding

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 10445 LNCS, Issue , 2017, Pages 200-215

  Wang, Wei ^a   Indulska, Marta ^b   Sadiq, Shazia ^a   Weber, Barbara ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Business process modeling; Business rule modeling; Cognitive research

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; BUSINESS REQUIREMENT; BUSINESS RULES; EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION; GRAPHICAL PROCESS MODELS; INTEGRATION APPROACH; ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIVITIES; SHARED UNDERSTANDING;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 85053489356     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65000-5_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Cheng, R., Sadiq, S., Indulska, M.: Framework for business process and rule integration: a case of BPMN and SBVR. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 87, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21863-7_2
2. Sapkota, B., van Sinderen, M.: Exploiting rules and processes for increasing flexibility in service composition. In: 2010 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), pp. 177–185. IEEE (2010)
3. Kappel, G., Rausch-Schott, S., Retschitzegger, W.: Coordination in workflow management systems — a rule-based approach. In: Conen, W., Neumann, G. (eds.) ASIAN 1996. LNCS, vol. 1364, pp. 99–119. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). doi:10.1007/BFb0027102
4. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.F., Indulska, M.: Do ontological deficiencies in modeling grammars matter? MIS Q. 35, 57–79 (2011)
5. Zur Muehlen, M., Indulska, M., Kittel, K.: Towards integrated modeling of business processes and business rules. In: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS)-Creating the Future: Transforming Research into Practice, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 690–697. Citeseer (2008)
6. Habich, D., Richly, S., Demuth, B., Gietl, F., Spilke, J., Lehner, W., Assmann, U.: Joining business rules and business processes. In: Proceedings of IT (2010)
7. Zur Muehlen, M., Indulska, M.: Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: a representational analysis. Inf. Syst. 35, 379–390 (2010)
8. Kluza, K., Kaczor, K., Nalepa, G.J.: Enriching business processes with rules using the Oryx BPMN Editor. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7268, pp. 573–581. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29350-4_68
9. Nalepa, G.J., Kluza, K., Kaczor, K.: Proposal of an inference engine architecture for business rules and processes. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7895, pp. 453–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38610-7_42
10. Milanovic, M., Gasevic, D., Rocha, L.: Modeling flexible business processes with business rule patterns. In: 2011 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 65–74 (2011)
11. Governatori, G., Shek, S.: Rule based business process compliance. In: Proceedings of the RuleML2012@ ECAI Challenge, article 5 (2012)
12. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. Bus. Horiz. 36, 90–91 (1993)
13. Kovacic, A., Groznik, A.: The business rule-transformation approach. In: 26th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, vol. 1, pp. 113–117 (2004)
14. Rabova, I.: Methodology of the enterprise architecture creating and the role of the enterprise architecture in rural development. Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika 56, 334– 340 (2010)
15. Skersys, T., Tutkute, L., Butleris, R., Butkiene, R.: Extending BPMN business process model with SBVR business vocabulary and rules. Inf. Technol. Control 41, 356–367 (2012)
16. Wang, W., Indulska, M., Sadiq, S.: Cognitive efforts in using integrated models of business processes and rules-semantic scholar. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE Workshop), Ljubljana, Slovenia. Springer (2016)
17. Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Göser, K., Dadam, P.: On enabling integrated process compliance with semantic constraints in process management systems. Inf. Syst. Front. 14, 195–219 (2012)
18. Green, P.F., Rosemann, M.: Perceived ontological weaknesses of process modeling techniques: further evidence. In: Proceedings of the ECIS, pp. 312–321 (2002)
19. Herbst, H., Knolmayer, G., Myrach, T., Schlesinger, M.: The specification of business rules: a comparison of selected methodologies. In: Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, pp. 29–46 (1994)
20. Krogstie, J., McBrien, P., Owens, R., Seltveit, A.H.: Information systems development using a combination of process and rule based approaches. In: Andersen, R., Bubenko, J.A., Sølvberg, A. (eds.) CAiSE 1991. LNCS, vol. 498, pp. 319–335. Springer, Heidelberg (1991). doi:10.1007/3-540-54059-8_92
21. McBrien, P., Seltveit, A.H.: Coupling process models and business rules. In: Sölvberg, A., Krogstie, J., Seltveit, A.H. (eds.) Information Systems Development for Decentralized Organizations. ITIFIP, pp. 201–217. Springer, Boston, MA (1995). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-34871-1_12
22. Knolmayer, G., Endl, R., Pfahrer, M.: Modeling processes and workflows by business rules. In: van der Aalst, W., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 16–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). doi:10.1007/3-540-45594-9_2
23. Burton-Jones, A., Meso, P.N.: Conceptualizing systems for understanding: an empirical test of decomposition principles in object-oriented analysis. Inf. Syst. Res. 17, 38–60 (2006)
24. Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., Dijkman, R.M.: Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension. Inf. Syst. 36, 881–897 (2011)
25. Mendling, J., Strembeck, M., Recker, J.: Factors of process model comprehension—findings from a series of experiments. Decis. Support Syst. 53, 195–206 (2012)
26. Bera, P.: Does cognitive overload matter in understanding BPMN models? J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 52, 59–69 (2012)
27. Recker, J.C., Dreiling, A.: Does it matter which process modelling language we teach or use? An experimental study on understanding process modelling languages without formal education. In: Toleman, M., Cater-Steel, A., Roberts, D. (eds.) Faculty of Science and Technology, pp. 356–366. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia (2007)
28. Figl, K.: Comprehension of procedural visual business process models–a literature review. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59, 41–67 (2017)
29. Loucopoulos, P., Kadir, W.M.N.W.: BROOD: business rules-driven object oriented design. J. Database Manage. (JDM) 19, 41–73 (2008)
30. Sweller, J., Chandler, P.: Why some material is difficult to learn. Cogn. Instr. 12, 185–233 (1994)
31. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., Kuhn, M.A.: Experimental methods: between-subject and within-subject design. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 81, 1–8 (2012)
32. Meghanathan, R.N., van Leeuwen, C., Nikolaev, A.R.: Fixation duration surpasses pupil size as a measure of memory load in free viewing. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 1063 (2015)
33. Zugal, S., Pinggera, J., Weber, B., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Assessing the impact of hierarchy on model understandability – a cognitive perspective. In: Kienzle, J. (ed.) MODELS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7167, pp. 123–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_14
34. Zugal, S.: Applying cognitive psychology for improving the creation, understanding and maintenance of business process models
35. Haji, F.A., Rojas, D., Childs, R., de Ribaupierre, S., Dubrowski, A.: Measuring cognitive load: performance, mental effort and simulation task complexity. Med. Educ. 49, 815–827 (2015)
36. Box, G.E., Hunter, W.G., Hunter, J.S.: Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. JSTOR (1978)
37. Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56, 81–105 (1959)
38. Wang, W., Indulska, M., Sadiq, S.: To integrate or not to integrate – the business rules question. In: Nurcan, S., Soffer, P., Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9694, pp. 51–66. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_4
39. Zoet, M., Versendaal, J., Ravesteyn, P., Welke, R.J.: Alignment of business process management and business rules. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland, p. 34 (2011)
40. Hashmi, M., Governatori, G., Wynn, M.T.: Normative requirements for business process compliance. In: Davis, J.G., Demirkan, H., Motahari-Nezhad, H.R. (eds.) ASSRI 2013. LNBIP, vol. 177, pp. 100–116. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07950-9_8