Alignment of business process management and business rules

19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Zoet, Martijn ^a   Versendaal, Johan ^a,b   Ravesteyn, Pascal ^a   Welke, Richard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business process management; Business rule categories; Business rules; Business rules management

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS ACTIVITIES; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS RULES; MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE;

EID: 84870639140     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Awad, A., Grosskopf, A., Meyer, A., and Weske, M., 2007. Enabling Resource Assignment Constraints in BPMN. [online] Potsdam: Hasso Plattner Institute. Available at: http://bpt.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/pub/Public/AhmedAwad/ Enabling-Resource-Assignment-Constraints-in.pdf
2. Basel Committee., 2003. General Guide to Account Opening and Customer Identification. Available at: http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs85annex.htm
3. Coltrera, M.D., 2002. Designing clinical databases. Otolaryngologic clinics of North America, 35(6), pp. 1245-1262.
4. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 1991. Internal Control, Integrated Framework. New York: Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
5. Boyatzis, R., 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Bajec, M. and Krisper, M., 2005. A methodology and tool support for managing business rules in organisations. Information Systems, 30 (6), pp. 423-443.
7. IT Governance Institute, 2007. Cobit 4.1: Framework Control Objectives Management Guidelines Maturity Models. Rolling Meadows: IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows.
8. Debevoise, T., 2005. Business Process Management with a Business Rules Approach: Implementing the Service Oriented Architecture. Charleston: Business Knowledge Architects.
9. Ghose, A. and Koliadist, G., 2007. Auditing Business Process Compliance. In Proceedings of the ICSOC 2007, ed. Krämer, B., Heidelberg, pp. 169.
10. Green, P. and Rosemann, M., 2000. Integrated process modelling: An ontological evaluation. Information Systems, 25 (2), pp. 73-87.
11. Gottesdiener E., 1997. Business Rules Show Power, Promise. Application Development Trends. 4 (3), pp. 36-42.
12. Jellema, L., 2000. CDM Ruleframe: Speaking CDM Rules language. Oracle Corporation: Redwood Shores.
13. Jeston, J. And Nelis, J., 2006. Business Process Manaement - Practical Guidelines to Successful Implementations. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
14. Hay, D. and Healy, K., 2000. Defining Business Rules: What are they really?. [online] Business Rules Group. Available at: http://www. businessrulesgroup.org/first-paper/BRG-whatisBR-3ed.pdf
15. Hammer, M. and Champy, J., 1993. Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business.
16. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J. and Ram, S., 2004. Design Science in Information Systems Research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28 (1), pp. 75-105.
17. Herbst H., 1996. Business Rules in Systems Analysis: A Meta-Model and Repository System. Information Systems, 21 (2), pp. 147-166.
18. Herbst H., 1997. Business Rule-Oriented Conceptual Modelling. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
19. Kardasis, P. and Loucopoulos, B., 2004. Expressing and organising business rules. Information and Software Technology, 46 (11), pp. 701-718.
20. Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.T.C. and Guha, S., 1997. Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21 (1), pp. 55-80.
21. Knolmayer G, Endl, R. and Phahrer, M., 2000. Modelling Processes and Workflows by Business Rules. In: Business Process Management, ed. Van Der Aalst, Heidelberg, pp. 16-29.
22. Knorr, K., 2000. Dynamic access control through petri net workflows. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, New Orleans, pp. 159-167.
23. Knorr, K., and Weidner, H., 2001. Analyzing seperation of duties in petri net workflows. Proceedings of MMM-ACNS'01, Heidelberg, pp. 102-114.
24. Kovacic, A., 2004. Business renovation: business rules (still) the missing link. Business Process Management Journal, 10 (2), pp. 158-170.
25. Krippendorff, K., 2003. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26. Marchetti, A., 2005. Beyond Sarbanes-Oxly Compliance: Effective Enterprise Risk Management. New Jersey: Wiley.
27. Mendling, J., Ploesser, K. and Strembeck, M., 2008. Specifying Separation of Duty Constraints in BPEL4People Processes. Business Information Systems, 7 (8), pp. 273-284.
28. Morgan, T., 2002. Business Rules and Information Systems. Indianapolis: Pearson Education.
29. Neunendorf M., 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
30. Park. C. and Choi, I., 2004. Management of business process constraints using BPTrigger, Computers in Industry, 55 (1), pp. 29-51.
31. Porter, M.E., 1985. Competitive advantage creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
32. th ed. New York: Protiviti.
33. Prim, M. F., and Trabasso, L.G., 2005. Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Applied To Business Process Management Projects (BPM-TRIZ). Triz-Journal, 11(1), pp. 32-40.
34. Rabitti, F., Bertino, E., Kim, W. and Woelk, D., 1991. A model of authorization for next-generation database systems. ACM Trans. on Database Systems, 1(16), pp. 88-13.
35. Ram, S. and Khatri, V., 2005. A comprehensive framework for modelling set-based business rules during conceptual database design. Information Systems, 30(2), pp. 89-118.
36. Ravesteyn, P., 2007. Business Process Management Systems: Hype or New Paradigm. Proceedings of the 18th conference of the International Information Management Association, Beijing, pp. 32-43.
37. Rikhardsson, P., Best, P., Green, P. and Rosemann, M. (2006): Business Process Risk Management and Internal Control: A proposed Research Agenda in the context of Compliance and ERP Systems. Proceedings of Second Asia/Pacific Research Symposium on Accounting Information Systems, Melbourne.
38. nd ed. Houston: Business Rule Solutions, Inc.
39. Tarantino, A., 2008. Governance, Risk, and Compliance Handbook. New Jersey: Wiley.
40. Shao. J. and Pound, C. J., 1999. Extracting Business Rule from Information System, BT Technology Journal, 17 (4), pp. 179-186.
41. Van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M. and Weske, M., 2003. Business Process Management: A Survey. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. i - xiii.
42. Von Halle, B., 2001. Business Rules Applied: Building Better Systems Using the Business Rules Approach. New York: Wiley.
43. Van Wijk, C., 2000. Toetsende Statistiek Basistechnieken. Amsterdam: Coutinho.
44. Webster, J. and Watson, R., 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26(2), pp. xiii-xxiii.
45. Weske, M.,2007. Business Process Management - Concepts, Languages, Architectures. New York: Springer.
46. Wimmer, R. D. and Dominick, J.R., 1997. Mass Media Research: An Introduction. Belmont: MA: Wadsworth.
47. Qumer, A. and Henderson-Seller, B., 2008. A framework to support the evaluation, adoption and improvement of agile methods in practice. Journal of Systems and Software, 81(11), pp. 1899-1919.
48. Qumer, A. and Henderson-Sellers, B., 2006. Measuring agility and adoptability of agile methods: a 4-dimensional analytical tool. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Applied Computing ed Guimaraes, N., Barcelona, pp. 503-507.
49. Vassiliadis, P., Bouzeghoub, M. and Quix, Ch., 2000. Towards Quality-oriented DataWarehouse Usage and Evolution. Information Systems, 25(2), pp. 89-115.
50. th International Conference on Business Process Management, Berlin, pp. 64-79.
51. Zur Muehlen, M. and Indulska, M., 2010. Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: A representational analysis. Information Systems, 35 (4), pp. 379-390.
52. Zur Muehlen, M. and Rosemann, M., 2005. Integrating Risks in Business Process Models. Proceedings of 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, pp.