Embracing scale-dependence to achieve a deeper understanding of biodiversity and its change across communities

Ecology Letters

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2018, Pages 1737-1751

  Chase, Jonathan M ^a,b   McGill, Brian J ^c   McGlinn, Daniel J ^d   May, Felix ^a,e   Blowes, Shane A ^a   Xiao, Xiao ^c   Knight, Tiffany M ^a,b,f   Purschke, Oliver ^a   Gotelli, Nicholas J ^g  

^a GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH IDIV HALLE JENA LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^d Department of Teacher Education and Department of Sociology and Anthropology   (United States)

^e LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

^f HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

Evenness; Hill number; rarefaction; scale dependence; Simpson's index; species richness; species area relationship

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPLEXITY; INDEX METHOD; SCALE EFFECT; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES EVENNESS; SPECIES RICHNESS;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY;

EID: 85052920468     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13151     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Alroy, J. (2017). Effects of habitat disturbance on tropical forest biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 114, 6056–6061
2. Anderson, M.J., Crist, T.O., Chase, J.M., Vellend, M., Inouye, B.D., Freestone, A.L. et al. (2011). Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol. Lett., 14, 19–28
3. Andrew, M.E., Wulder, M.A., Coops, N.C. & Baillargeon, G. (2012). Beta-diversity gradients of butterflies along productivity axes. Global Ecol. Biogeog., 21, 352–364
4. Azaele, S., Maritan, A., Cornell, S.J., Suweis, S., Banavar, J.R., Gabriel, D. et al. (2015). Towards a unified descriptive theory for spatial ecology: predicting biodiversity patterns across spatial scales. Methods Ecol. Evol., 6, 324–332
5. Baselga, A. (2010). Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecol. Biogeog., 19, 134–143
6. Blowes, S.A., Belmaker, J. & Chase, J.M. (2017). Global reef fish richness gradients emerge from divergent and scale-dependent component changes. Proc. R. Soc. B, 284, 20170947
7. Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Soft., 80, 1–28
8. Cao, Y., Hawkins, C.P., Larsen, D.P. & Van Sickle, J. (2007). Effects of sample standardization on mean species detectabilities and estimates of relative differences in species richness among assemblages. Am. Nat., 170, 381–395
9. Cayuela, L., Gotelli, N.J. & Colwell, R.K. (2015). Ecological and biogeographic null hypotheses for comparing rarefaction curves. Ecol. Monog., 85, 437–455
10. Chao, A. (1984). Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat., 11, 265–270
11. Chao, A. & Jost, L. (2012). Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology, 93, 2533–2547
12. Chao, A., Colwell, R.K., Lin, C.W. & Gotelli, N.J. (2009). Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology, 90, 1125–1133
13. Chao, A., Gotelli, N.J., Hsieh, T.C., Sander, E.L., Ma, K.H., Colwell, R.K. et al. (2014a). Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monog., 84, 45–67
14. Chao, A., Chiu, C.H. & Jost, L. (2014b). Unifying species diversity, phylogenetic diversity, functional diversity, and related similarity and differentiation measures through Hill numbers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 45, 297–324
15. Chao, A., Chiu, C.H., Hsieh, T.C., Davis, T., Nipperess, D.A. & Faith, D.P. (2015). Rarefaction and extrapolation of phylogenetic diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol., 6, 380–388
16. Chase, J.M. (2010). Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Science, 328, 1388–1391
17. Chase, J.M. & Knight, T.M. (2013). Scale-dependent effect sizes of ecological drivers on biodiversity: why standardised sampling is not enough. Ecol. Lett., 16, 17–26
18. Chase, J.M. & Leibold, M.A. (2002). Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship. Nature, 416, 427–430
19. Chiarucci, A., Bacaro, G., Rocchini, D. & Fattorini, L. (2008). Discovering and rediscovering the sample-based rarefaction formula in the ecological literature. Comm. Ecol., 9, 121–123
20. Chiarucci, A., Bacaro, G., Rocchini, D., Ricotta, C., Palmer, M. & Scheiner, S. (2009). Spatially constrained rarefaction: incorporating the autocorrelated structure of biological communities into sample-based rarefaction. Comm. Ecol., 10, 209–214
21. Chiu, C.H., Jost, L. & Chao, A. (2014). Phylogenetic beta diversity, similarity, and differentiation measures based on Hill numbers. Ecol. Monog., 84, 21–44
22. Colwell, R.K. & Coddington, J.A. (1994). Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B., 345, 101–118
23. Colwell, R.K., Chao, A., Gotelli, N.J., Lin, S.Y., Mao, C.X., Chazdon, R.L. et al. (2012). Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. J. Plant Ecol., 5, 3–21
24. Condit, R., Lao, S., Pérez, R., Dolins, S.B., Foster, R.B. & Hubbell, S.P. (2012). Barro Colorado Forest Census Plot Data, 2012 Version. Center for Tropical Forest Science Databases. https://doi.org/10.5479/data.bci.20130603
25. Crist, T.O. & Veech, J.A. (2006). Additive partitioning of rarefaction curves and species-area relationships: unifying α-, β-and γ-diversity with sample size and habitat area. Ecol. Lett., 9, 923-932
26. Dauby, G. & Hardy, O.J. (2012). Sample-based estimation of diversity sensu stricto by transforming Hurlbert diversities into effective number of species. Ecography, 35, 661–672
27. Dornelas, M., Gotelli, N.J., McGill, B., Shimadzu, H., Moyes, F., Sievers, C. et al. (2014). Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science, 344, 296–299
28. Dumbrell, A.J., Clark, E.J., Frost, G.A., Randell, T.E., Pitchford, J.W. & Hill, J.K. (2008). Changes in species diversity following habitat disturbance are dependent on spatial scale: theoretical and empirical evidence. J. Appl. Ecol., 45, 1531–1539
29. Eggeling, W.J. (1947). Observations on the ecology of the Budongo Rain Forest, Uganda. Ecology, 34, 20–87
30. Gardezi, T. & Gonzalez, A. (2008). Scale dependence of species-energy relationships: evidence from fishes in thousands of lakes. Am. Nat., 171, 800–815
31. Gelman, A., Goodrich, B., Gabry, J. & Ali, I. (2017). R-squared for Bayesian regression models. Available at: http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/. Last accessed July, 2018
32. Gotelli, N.J. & Colwell, R.K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett., 4, 379–391
33. Harrod, J. (1964). The distribution of invertebrates on submerged aquatic plants in a chalk stream. J. Anim. Ecol., 33, 335–348
34. Hamer, K.C. & Hill, J.K. (2000). Scale-dependent effects of habitat disturbance on species richness in tropical forests. Conservation Biology, 14, 1435-1440
35. He, F. & Legendre, P. (2002). Species diversity patterns derived from species–area models. Ecology, 83, 1185–1198
36. Hill, M.O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54, 427–432
37. Hill, J.K. & Hamer, K.C. (2004). Determining impacts of habitat modification on diversity of tropical forest fauna: the importance of spatial scale. J. Appl. Ecol., 41, 744–754
38. Hillebrand, H., Blasius, B., Borer, E.T., Chase, J.M., Downing, J.A., Eriksson, B.K. et al. (2018). Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: consequences for conservation and monitoring. J. Appl. Ecol., 55, 169–184
39. Hurlbert, S.H. (1971). The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 52, 577–586
40. Jost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113, 363–375
41. Jost, L. (2007). Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology, 88, 2427–2439
42. Keil, P., Biesmeijer, J.C., Barendregt, A., Reemer, M. & Kunin, W.E. (2011). Biodiversity change is scale-dependent: an example from Dutch and UK hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae). Ecography, 34, 392–401
43. Kunin, W.E., Harte, J., He, F., Hui, C., Jobe, R.T., Ostling, A. et al. (2018). Upscaling biodiversity: estimating the species–area relationship from small samples. Ecol. Monog., 88, 170–187
44. Lambshead, P.J.D. (1986). Sub-catastrophic sewage and industrial waste contamination as revealed by marine nematode faunal analysis. Marine Ecol. Prog. Ser., 29, 247–260
45. Lande, R. (1996). Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos, 5–13
46. Lande, R., DeVries, P.J. & Walla, T.R. (2000). When species accumulation curves intersect: implications for ranking diversity using small samples. Oikos, 89, 601–605
47. Legendre, P. (2014). Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Global Ecol. Biogeog., 23, 1324–1334
48. Livne-Luzon, S., Ovadia, O., Weber, G., Avidan, Y., Migael, H., Glassman, S.I. et al. (2017). Small-scale spatial variability in the distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi affects plant performance and fungal diversity. Ecol. Lett., 20, 1192–1202
49. MacArthur, R.H. & MacArthur, J.W. (1961). On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42, 594–598
50. Magurran, A.E. & McGill, B.J. (eds) (2011). Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford
51. Martinson, V.G., Douglas, A.E. & Jaenike, J. (2017). Community structure of the gut microbiota in sympatric species of wild Drosophila. Ecol. Lett., 20, 629–639
52. May, F., Gerstner, K., McGlinn, D.J., Xiao, X. & Chase, J.M. (2018). mobsim: an R package for the simulation and measurement of biodiversity across spatial scales. Methods Ecol. Evol., 9, 1401–1408
53. McCabe, D.J. & Gotelli, N.J. (2000). Effects of disturbance frequency, intensity, and area on assemblages of stream macroinvertebrates. Oecologia, 124, 270–279
54. McGill, B.J. (2011a). Linking biodiversity patterns by autocorrelated random sampling. Am. J. Bot., 98, 481–502
55. McGill, B.J. (2011b). Species abundance distributions. In Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment (eds Magurran, A. & McGill, B.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 105–122
56. McGlinn, D.J. & Palmer, M.W. (2009). Modeling the sampling effect in the species–time–area relationship. Ecology, 90, 836–846
57. McGlinn, D.J., Xiao, X., May, F., Gotelli, N.J., Engel, T., Blowes, S. et al. (2018). MoB (Measurement of Biodiversity): a method to separate the scale-dependent effects of species abundance distribution, density, and aggregation on diversity change. bioRxiv, 244103
58. Morlon, H., Schwik, D.W., Bryant, L.A., Marquet, P.A., Rebelo, A.G., Tauss, C. et al. (2011). Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity. Ecol. Lett., 14, 141–149
59. Newbold, T., Boakes, E.H., Hill, S.L., Harfoot, M.B. & Collen, B. (2017). The present and future effects of land use on ecological assemblages in tropical grasslands and savannas in Africa. Oikos, 126, 1760–1769
60. Olszewski, T.D. (2004). A unified mathematical framework for the measurement of richness and evenness within and among multiple communities. Oikos, 104, 377–387
61. Pardieck, K.L., Ziolkowski, Jr., D.J., Lutmerding, M., Campbell, K. & Hudson, M.-A.R. (2017). North American Breeding Bird Survey Dataset 1966–2016, Version 2016.0. U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.https://doi.org/10.5066/f7w0944j. Available at: www.pwrc.usgs.gov/BBS/RawData/. Last accessed April 2017
62. Powell, K.I., Chase, J.M. & Knight, T.M. (2011). A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. Am. J. Bot., 98, 539–548
63. Powell, K.I., Chase, J.M. & Knight, T.M. (2013). Invasive plants have scale-dependent effects on diversity by altering species-area relationships. Science, 339, 316–318
64. Preston, F.W. (1960). Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology, 41, 611–627
65. R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.4.1 R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. Last accessed June 2017
66. Rahbek, C. (2005). The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol. Lett., 8, 224–239
67. Sandel, B. & Smith, A.B. (2009). Scale as a lurking factor: incorporating scale-dependence in experimental ecology. Oikos, 118, 1284–1291
68. Scheiner, S.M. (2003). Six types of species-area curves. Global Ecol. Biogeog., 12, 441–447
69. Scheiner, S.M., Cox, S.B., Mittelbach, G.G., Osenberg, C. & Kaspari, M. (2000). Species richness, species–area curves and Simpson's paradox. Evol. Ecol. Res., 2, 791–802
70. Simberloff, D. (1972). Properties of the rarefaction diversity measurement. Am. Nat., 106, 414–418
71. Smith, A.B., Sandel, B., Kraft, N.J. & Carey, S. (2013). Characterizing scale-dependent community assembly using the functional-diversity-area relationship. Ecology, 94, 2392–2402
72. Soininen, J., Passy, S. & Hillebrand, H. (2012). The relationship between species richness and evenness: a meta-analysis of studies across aquatic ecosystems. Oecologia, 169, 803-809
73. Solar, R.R.D.C., Barlow, J., Ferreira, J., Berenguer, E., Lees, A.C., Thomson, J.R. et al. (2015). How pervasive is biotic homogenization in human-modified tropical forest landscapes? Ecol. Lett., 18, 1108–1118
74. Srivastava, D.S. & Lawton, J.H. (1998). Why more productive sites have more species: an experimental test of theory using tree-hole communities. Am. Nat., 152, 510–529
75. Stirling, G. & Wilsey, B. (2001). Empirical relationships between species richness, evenness, and proportional diversity. Am. Nat., 158, 286-299
76. Storch, D. (2016). The theory of the nested species–area relationship: geometric foundations of biodiversity scaling. J. Veg. Sci., 27, 880–891
77. Storch, D., Bohdalková, E. & Okie, J. (2018). The more-individuals hypothesis revisited: the role of community abundance in species richness regulation and the productivity-diversity relationship. Ecol. Lett., 21, 920–937
78. Thompson, G.G. & Withers, P.C. (2003). Effect of species richness and relative abundance on the shape of the species accumulation curve. Aust. Ecol., 28, 355–360
79. Tuomisto, H. (2010). A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography, 33, 2–22
80. Wilsey, B.J., Chalcraft, D.R., Bowles, C.M. & Willig, M.R. (2005). Relationships among indices suggest that richness is an incomplete surrogate for grassland biodiversity. Ecology, 86, 1178-1184
81. Whittaker, R.H. (1960). Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monog., 30, 279–338
82. Whittaker, R.J., Willis, K.J. & Field, R. (2001). Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. J. Biogeog., 28, 453–470