The theory of the nested species–area relationship: geometric foundations of biodiversity scaling

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 880-891

  Storch, David ^a,b  

^a Center for Theoretical Study   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Diversity patterns; Intraspecific aggregation; Macroecology; Sampling effect; Scale; Self similarity; Species richness; Species area relationship; Species energy relationship

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COLONIZATION; EXTINCTION; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; MACROECOLOGY; NESTEDNESS; RARITY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84987624555     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: 16541103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12428     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Allen, A.P. & White, E.P. 2003. Effects of range size on species–area relationships. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 493–499.
2. Arita, H.T. & Rodríguez, P. 2002. Geographic range, turnover rate and the scaling of species diversity. Ecography 25: 541–550.
3. Arrhenius, O. 1921. Species and area. Journal of Ecology 9: 95–99.
4. Brook, B.W., Sodhi, N.S. & Ng, P.K.L. 2003. Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424: 420–426.
5. Brown, J.H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. The American Naturalist 124: 255–279.
6. Chave, J., Müller-Landau, H.C. & Levin, S.A. 2002. Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. The American Naturalist 159: 1–23.
7. Chiarucci, A., Viciani, D., Winter, C. & Diekmann, M. 2006. Effect of productivity on species–area curves in herbaceous vegetation: evidence of experimental and observational data. Oikos 115: 475–483.
8. Coleman, D.B. 1981. On random placement and species–area relations. Mathematical Biosciences 54: 191–215.
9. Crawley, M.J. & Harral, J.E. 2001. Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. Science 291: 864–868.
10. Currie, D.J., Mittelbach, G.G., Cornell, H.V., Field, R., Guéganí, J.F., Hawkins, B.A., Kaufman, D.M., Kerr, J.T., Oberdorff, T., O'Brien, E.M. & Turner, J.R.G. 2004. Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecology Letters 7: 1121–1134.
11. Dengler, J. 2008. Pitfalls in small-scale species–area sampling and analysis. Folia Geobotanica 43: 269–287.
12. Dengler, J. 2009. Which function describes the species–area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation. Journal of Biogeography 36: 728–744.
13. Dengler, J. & Oldeland, J. 2010. Effect of sampling protocol on the shapes of species richness curves. Journal of Biogeography 37: 1698–1705.
14. Fridley, J.D., Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.R. & White, P.S. 2005. Connecting fine- and broad-scale species–area relationships of southeastern U.S. flora. Ecology 86: 1172–1177.
15. Gleason, H.A. 1922. On the relation between species and area. Ecology 3: 158–162.
16. Grili, J., Azaele, S., Banavar, J.R. & Maritam, A. 2012. Spatial aggregation and the species–area relationship across scales. Journal of Theoretical Biology 313: 87–97.
17. Guilhaumon, F., Gimenez, O., Gaston, K.J. & Mouillot, D. 2008. Taxonomic and regional uncertainty in species–area relationships and the identification of richness hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 15458–15463.
18. Güler, B., Jentsch, A., Bartha, S., Bloor, J.M.G., Campetella, G., Canullo, R., Házi, J., Kreyling, J., Pottier, J., (…) & Dengler, J. 2016. How plot shape and dispersion affect plant species richness counts: implications for sampling design and rarefaction analyses. Journal of Vegetation Science 27: 692–703.
19. Halley, J.M., Hartley, S., Kallimanis, A.S., Kunin, W.E., Lennon, J.J. & Sgardelis, S.P. 2004. Uses and abuses of fractal methodology in ecology. Ecology Letters 7: 254–271.
20. Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38: 210–221.
21. Harte, J. & Kinzig, A.P. 1997. On the implications of species–area relationships for endemism, spatial turnover, and food web patterns. Oikos 80: 417–427.
22. Harte, J., Kinzig, A. & Green, J. 1999. Self-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species. Science 284: 334–336.
23. Harte, J., Zillio, T., Conlisk, E. & Smith, A.B. 2008. Maximum entropy and the state variable approach to macroecology. Ecology 89: 2700–2711.
24. Harte, J., Smith, A.B. & Storch, D. 2009. Biodiversity scales from plots to biomes with a universal species–area curve. Ecology Letters 12: 789–797.
25. Harte, J., Kitzes, J., Newman, E. & Rominger, A. 2013. Taxon categories and the universal species–area relationship. The American Naturalist 181: 282–287.
26. Hartley, S., Kunin, W.E., Lennon, J.J. & Pocock, M.J.O. 2003. Coherence and continuity in the scaling of species′ distribution patterns. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 271: 81–88.
27. He, F. & Hubbell, S.P. 2011. Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss. Nature 473: 368–371.
28. He, F. & Legendre, P. 1996. On species–area relations. The American Naturalist 148: 719–737.
29. He, F. & Legendre, P. 2002. Species diversity patterns derived from species–area models. Ecology 85: 1185–1198.
30. Hubbell, S.P. 2001. The unified theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, US.
31. Hurlbert, A.H. & Jetz, W. 2010. More than “More individuals”: the nonequivalence of area and energy in the scaling of species richness. The American Naturalist 176: E50–E65.
32. Kéfi, S., Rietkerk, M., Roy, M., Franc, A., de Ruiter, P.C. & Pascual, M. 2011. Robust scaling in ecosystems and the meltdown of patch size distributions before extinction. Ecology Letters 14: 29–35.
33. Keil, P., Storch, D. & Jetz, W. 2015. On the decline of biodiversity due to area loss. Nature Communications 6: 9837.
34. Koleff, P., Gaston, K.J. & Lennon, J.J. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 367–382.
35. Kunin, W.E. 1998. Extrapolating species abundances across spatial scales. Science 281: 1513–1515.
36. Lazarina, M., Kallimanis, A.S. & Sgardelis, S.P. 2013. Does the universality of the species–area relationship apply to smaller scales and across taxonomic groups? Ecography 36: 965–970.
37. Lennon, J.J., Kunin, W.E. & Hartley, S. 2002. Fractal species distributions do not produce power-law species area distribution. Oikos 97: 378–386.
38. Lomolino, M.V. 2000. Ecology's most general, yet protean pattern: the species–area relationship. Journal of Biogeography 27: 17–26.
39. MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. 1963. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17: 373–387.
40. MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. 1967. The theory of Island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, US.
41. Marquet, P.A., Allen, A.P., Brown, J.H., Dunne, J.A., Enquist, B.J., Gillooly, J.F., Gowaty, P.A., Green, J.L., Harte, J., (…) & West, G.B. 2014. On theory in ecology. BioScience 64: 701–710.
42. Martin, H.G. & Goldenfeld, N. 2006. On the origin and robustness of power-law species–area relationships in ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 10310–10315.
43. May, R. 1975. Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In: Cody, M.L. & Diamond, J.M. (eds.) Ecology and evolution of communities, pp. 81–120. Belknap Press, Harvard, MA, US.
44. McGill, B.J. 2010. Towards a unification of unified theories of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 13: 627–642.
45. McGill, B.J. & Collins, C. 2003. A unified theory for macroecology based on spatial patterns of abundance. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 469–492.
46. McGlinn, D.J., Xiao, X. & White, E. 2013. An empirical evaluation of four variants of a universal species–area relationship. PeerJ 1:e212.
47. Nekola, J.C. & White, P.S. 1999. Distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography 26: 867–878.
48. Palmer, M.W. 2007. Species–area curves and the geometry of nature. In: Storch, D., Marquet, P.A. & Brown, J.H. (eds.) Scaling biodiversity, pp. 15–31. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
49. Pautasso, M. & Gaston, K.J. 2005. Resources and global avian assemblage structure in forests. Ecology Letters 8: 282–289.
50. Pe'er, G., Tsianou, M.A., Franz, K.W., Matsinos, Y.G., Mazaris, A.D., Storch, D., Kopsova, L., Verboom, J., Baguette, M., Stevens, V.M. & Henle, K. 2014. Toward better application of minimum area requirements in conservation planning. Biological Conservation 170: 92–102.
51. Pereira, H.M. & Daily, G.C. 2006. Modelling biodiversity dynamics in countryside landscapes. Ecology 87: 1877–1885.
52. Pimm, S.L. & Askins, R.A. 1995. Forest losses predict bird extinctions in eastern North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 9343–9347.
53. Preston, F.V. 1960. Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 41: 611–627.
54. Pueyo, S., Graca, P.M.L.A., Barbosa, R.I., Cots, R., Cardona, E. & Fearnside, P.M. 2010. Testing for criticality in ecosystem dynamics: the case of Amazonian rainforest and savanna fire. Ecology Letters 13: 793–802.
55. Quian, H., Fridley, J.D. & Palmer, M.W. 2007. The latitudinal gradient of species–area relationship for vascular plants of North america. The American Naturalist 170: 690–701.
56. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
57. Rosindell, J. & Cornell, S.J. 2007. Species–area relationship from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape. Ecology Letters 10: 586–595.
58. Rosindell, J. & Cornell, S.J. 2009. Species–area curves, neutral models, and long-distance dispersal. Ecology 90: 1743–1750.
59. Rybicki, J. & Hanski, I. 2013. Species–area relationships and extinctions caused by habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecology Letters 16: 27–38.
60. Scanlon, T.M., Caylor, K.K., Levin, S.A. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. 2007. Positive feedbacks promote power-law clustering of Kalahari vegetation. Nature 449: 209–217.
61. Scheiner, S.M. 2003. Six types of species–area curves. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 441–447.
62. Shmida, A. & Wilson, M.V. 1985. Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography 12: 1–20.
63. Šímová, I., Storch, D., Keil, P., Boyle, B., Phillips, O.L. & Enquist, B.J. 2011. Global species–energy relationship in forest plots: role of abundance, temperature and species’ climatic tolerances. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20: 842–856.
64. Šímová, I., Li, Y.M. & Storch, D. 2013. Relationship between species richness and productivity in plants: the role of sampling effect, heterogeneity and species pool. Journal of Ecology 101: 161–170.
65. Šizling, A.L. & Storch, D. 2004. Power-law species–area relationships and self-similar species distributions within finite areas. Ecology Letters 7: 60–68.
66. Šizling, A.L. & Storch, D. 2007. Geometry of species distributions: random clustering and scale invariance. In: Storch, D., Marquet, P.A. & Brown, J.H. (eds.) Scaling biodiversity, pp. 77–100. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
67. Šizling, A.L., Storch, D., Šizlingová, E., Reif, J. & Gaston, K.J. 2009. Species abundance distribution results from a spatial analogy of central limit theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 6691–6695.
68. Šizling, A.L., Kunin, W.E., Šizlingová, E., Reif, J. & Storch, D. 2011. Between geometry and biology: the problem of universality of the species–area relationship. The American Naturalist 178: 602–611.
69. Šizling, A.L., Kunin, W.E. & Storch, D. 2013. Taxon invariances, maximum entropy, and the species–area relationship. The American Naturalist 181: 288–290.
70. Smith, A.B. 2010. Caution with curves: caveats for using the species–area relationship in conservation. Biological Conservation 143: 555–564.
71. Stohlgren, T.J., Falkner, M.B. & Schell, L.D. 1995. A modified-Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method. Vegetatio 117: 113–121.
72. Storch, D. 2012. Biodiversity and its energetic and thermal controls. In: Sibly, R.M., Brown, J.H. & Kodric-Brown, A. (eds.) Metabolic ecology: a scaling approach, pp. 120–131. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
73. Storch, D. & Šizling, A.L. 2002. Patterns in commonness and rarity in central European birds: reliability of the core-satellite hypothesis. Ecography 25: 405–416.
74. Storch, D. & Šizling, A.L. 2008. The concept of taxon invariance in ecology: do diversity patterns vary with changes in taxonomic resolution? Folia Geobotanica 43: 329–344.
75. Storch, D., Evans, K.L. & Gaston, K.J. 2005. The species–area–energy relationship. Ecology Letters 8: 487–492.
76. Storch, D., Šizling, A.L. & Gaston, K.J. 2007. Scaling species richness and distribution: uniting the species–area and species–energy relationships. In: Storch, D., Marquet, P.A. & Brown, J.H. (eds.) Scaling biodiversity, pp. 300–322. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
77. Storch, D., Šizling, A.L., Reif, J., Polechová, J., Šizlingová, E. & Gaston, K.J. 2008. The quest for a null model for macroecological patterns: geometry of species distributions at multiple spatial scales. Ecology Letters 11: 771–784.
78. Storch, D., Keil, P. & Jetz, W. 2012. Universal species–area and endemics–area relationships at continental scales. Nature 488: 78–81.
79. Thomas, C.D., Cameron, A., Green, R.E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L.J., Collingham, Y.C., Erasmus, B.F.N., Siqueira, M.F., Grainger, A., (…) & Williams, S.E. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145–148.
80. Tjørve, E. 2003. Shapes and functions of species–area curves: a review of possible models. Journal of Biogeography 30: 827–835.
81. Tjørve, E. 2009. Shapes and functions of species–area curves (II): a review of new models and parameterizations. Journal of Biogeography 36: 1435–1445.
82. Tjørve, E. & Tjørve, K.M.C. 2008. The species–area relationship, self-similarity, and the true meaning of the z-value. Ecology 89: 3528–3533.
83. Triantis, K.A., Guilhaumon, F. & Whittaker, R.J. 2011. The island species–area relationship: biology and statistics. Journal of Biogeography 39: 215–231.
84. Triantis, K.A., Economo, E.P., Guilhaumon, F. & Ricklefs, R.E. 2015. Diversity regulation at macro-scales: species richness on oceanic archipelagos. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24: 594–605.
85. Waide, R.B., Willig, M.R., Steiner, C.F., Mittelbach, G., Gough, L., Dodson, S.I., Juday, G.P. & Parmenter, R. 1999. The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 257–300.
86. Wang, Z., Brown, J.H., Tang, Z. & Fang, J. 2009. Temperature dependence, spatial scale, and tree species diversity in eastern Asia and North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 13388–13392.
87. Wearn, O.R., Reuman, D.C. & Ewers, R.M. 2012. Extinction debt and windows of conservation opportunity in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 337: 228–232.
88. Williams, M.R. 1995. An extreme-value function model of the species incidence and species–area relationship. Ecology 76: 2607–2616.
89. Williamson, M. 2003. Species–area relationships at small scales in continuum vegetation. Journal of Ecology 91: 904–907.
90. Wright, D.H. 1983. Species–energy theory: an extension of species–area theory. Oikos 41: 496–506.