Sampled-based estimation of diversity sensu stricto by transforming Hurlbert diversities into effective number of species

Ecography

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 661-672

  Dauby, Gilles ^a   Hardy, Olivier J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; ESTIMATION METHOD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NICHE PARTITIONING; NUMERICAL MODEL; RARE SPECIES; SPECIES DIVERSITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84862766998     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06860.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baselga A. S. 2010. Multiplicative partition of true diversity yields independent alpha and beta components; additive partition does not. Ecology 91: 1974-1981.
2. Beck J. and Schwanghart W. 2010. Comparing measures of species diversity from incomplete inventories: an update. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 38-44.
3. Chao A. and Shen T. J. 2003. Nonparametric estimation of Shannon's index of diversity when there are unseen species in sample. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 10: 429-443.
4. Chao A. et al. 2008. A two-stage probabilistic approach to multiple-community similarity indices. Biometrics 64: 1178-1186.
5. Cleary D. F. R. et al. 2004. Diversity and community composition of butterflies and odonates in an ENSO-induced fire affected habitat mosaic: a case study from East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Oikos 105: 426-448.
6. Colwell R. K. and Coddington J. A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 345: 101-118.
7. Colwell R. K. et al. 2004. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85: 2717-2727.
8. Condit R. et al. 1998. Assessing forest diversity on small plots: calibration using species-individual curves from 50-ha plots. - In: Dallmeier F. C. (ed.), Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modelling. Conceptual background and old world case studies. The Parthenon Publishing Group, pp. 247-266.
9. Ellison A. M. 2010. Partitioning diversity. Ecology 91: 1962-1963.
10. Etienne R. S. 2005. A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 8: 253-260.
11. Gotelli N. J. and Colwell R. K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379-391.
12. Hankin R. K. S. 2007. Introducing untb, an R package for simulating ecological drift under the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. J. Stat. Softw. 22.
13. Hardy O. J. and Jost L. 2008. Interpreting and estimating measures of community phylogenetic structuring. J. Ecol. 96: 849-852.
14. Hill M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54: 427-432.
15. Hubbell S. P. 2001 The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. - Princeton Univ. Press.
16. Hurlbert S. H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577-586.
17. Jost L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113: 363-375.
18. Jost L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88: 2427-2439.
19. Jost L. et al. 2010. Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses. Divers. Distrib. 16: 65-76.
20. Kempton R. A. 1979. The structure of species abundance and measurement of diversity. Biometrics 35: 307-321.
21. Lande R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76: 5-13.
22. Mac Arthur R. H. 1965. Patterns of species diversity. Biol. Rev. 40: 510-533.
23. Nielsen R. et al. 2003. Estimating effective paternity number in social insects and the effective number of alleles in a population. Mol. Ecol. 12: 3157-3164.
24. Olszewski T. 2004. A unified mathematical framework for the measurement of richness and evenness within and among multiple communities. Oikos 104: 377-387.
25. Peet R. K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 285-307.
26. Pielou E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13: 131-144.
27. Ricotta C. 2008. Computing additive beta-diversity from presence and absence scores: a critique and alternative parameters. Theor. Popul. Biol. 73: 244-249.
28. Ricotta C. 2009. Computing parametric beta diversity with unequal plot weights: a solution based on resampling methods. Theor. Ecol. 2: 13-17.
29. Routledge R. D. 1979. Diversity indices: which ones are admissible? J. Theor. Biol. 76: 503-515.
30. Routledge R. D. 1980. Bias in estimating the diversity of large, uncensused communities. Ecology 61: 276-281.
31. Routledge R. D. 1984. Estimating ecological components of diversity. Oikos 42: 23-29.
32. Taylor L. R. et al. 1976. Diversity statistics and the log-series model. J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 255-272.
33. Tothmeresz B. 1995. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 283-290.
34. Tuomisto H. 2010. A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33: 2-22.
35. Veech J. A. and Crist T. O. 2010. Diversity partitioning without statistical independence of alpha and beta. Ecology 91: 1964-1969.
36. Walther B. A. and Moore J. L. 2005. The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography 28: 815-829.