Delay Within the 3-Hour Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guideline on Mortality for Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 500-505

  Pruinelli, Lisiane ^a   Westra, Bonnie L ^a,b   Yadav, Pranjul ^c   Hoff, Alexander ^c   Steinbach, Michael ^c   Kumar, Vipin ^c   Delaney, Connie W ^a,b   Simon, Gyorgy ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c University of Minnesota   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

electronic health record data; mortality; predictive modeling; severe sepsis; surviving sepsis campaign guideline

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; LACTIC ACID; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD CULTURE; BOOTSTRAPPING; BREATHING RATE; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTALLOID; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART RATE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; LACTATE BLOOD LEVEL; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; BLOOD; CARE BUNDLE; MIDDLE AGED; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME FACTOR; TIME TO TREATMENT; TRENDS;

AGED; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BLOOD CULTURE; CRYSTALLOID SOLUTIONS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; LACTIC ACID; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE BUNDLES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEPSIS; SHOCK, SEPTIC; TIME FACTORS; TIME-TO-TREATMENT;

EID: 85051428207     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002949     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Torio CM, Andrews RM: National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer, 2011: Statistical Brief #160. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD, 2006
2. Epstein L, Dantes R, Magill S, et al: Varying estimates of sepsis mortality using death certificates and administrative codes–United States, 1999-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65:342–345
3. Verdonk F, Blet A, Mebazaa A: The new sepsis definition. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 30:200–204
4. Novosad SA, Sapiano MR, Grigg C, et al: Vital signs: Epidemiology of sepsis: Prevalence of health care factors and opportunities for prevention. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65:864–869
5. Yende S, Austin S, Rhodes A, et al: Long-term quality of life among survivors of severe sepsis: Analyses of two international trials. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:1461–1467
6. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:165–228
7. Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, et al: The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: A prospective observational study. Crit Care 2005; 9:R764–R770
8. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Executive Committee: Updated Bundles in Response to New Evidence. 2015. Available at: http://www.survivingsepsis.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/SSC_Bundle.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2017
9. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Bell D, et al: A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: The ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:1549–1560
10. Investigators A, Group ACT, Peake SL, et al: Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1496–1506
11. Umscheid CA, Betesh J, VanZandbergen C, et al: Development, implementation, and impact of an automated early warning and response system for sepsis. J Hosp Med 2015; 10:26–31
12. Goodwin AJ, Rice DA, Simpson KN, et al: Frequency, cost, and risk factors of readmissions among severe sepsis survivors. Crit Care Med 2015; 43:738–746
13. Castellanos-Ortega A, Suberviola B, García-Astudillo LA, et al: Impact of the Surviving sepsis campaign protocols on hospital length of stay and mortality in septic shock patients: Results of a three-year followup quasi-experimental study. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:1036–1043
14. Damiani E, Donati A, Serafini G, et al: Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0125827
15. Bruce HR, Maiden J, Fedullo PF, et al: Impact of nurse-initiated ED sepsis protocol on compliance with sepsis bundles, time to initial antibiotic administration, and in-hospital mortality. J Emerg Nurs 2015; 41:130–137
16. Semler MW, Weavind L, Hooper MH, et al: An electronic tool for the evaluation and treatment of sepsis in the ICU: A randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2015; 43:1595–1602
17. Fujishima S, Gando S, Saitoh D, et al; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Sepsis Registry (JAAM SR) Study Group: A multicenter, prospective evaluation of quality of care and mortality in Japan based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. J Infect Chemother 2014; 20:115–120
18. Levy MM, Rhodes A, Phillips GS, et al: Surviving sepsis campaign: Association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study. Crit Care Med 2015; 43:3–12
19. Hoo WE, Muehlberg K, Ferraro RG, et al: Successes and lessons learned implementing the sepsis bundle. J Healthc Qual 2009; 31:9–14; quiz 14
20. Xu JY, Chen QH, Liu SQ, et al: The effect of early goal-directed therapy on outcome in adult severe sepsis and septic shock patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Anesth Analg 2016; 123:371–381
21. Rhodes A, Phillips G, Beale R, et al: The surviving sepsis campaign bundles and outcome: Results from the international multicentre prevalence study on sepsis (the IMPreSS study). Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:1620–1628
22. Kadri SS, Rhee C, Strich JR, et al: Estimating ten-year trends in septic shock incidence and mortality in United States academic medical centers using clinical data. Chest 2017; 151:278–285
23. Rhee C, Kadri S, Huang SS, et al: Objective sepsis surveillance using electronic clinical data. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 37:163–171
24. Brandt BN, Gartner AB, Moncure M, et al: Identifying severe sepsis via electronic surveillance. Am J Med Qual 2015; 30:559–565
25. Narayanan N, Gross AK, Pintens M, et al: Effect of an electronic medical record alert for severe sepsis among ED patients. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34:185–188
26. McRee L, Thanavaro JL, Moore K, et al: The impact of an electronic medical record surveillance program on outcomes for patients with sepsis. Hear Lung J Acute Crit Care 2014; 43:546–549
27. Westra BL, Landman S, Yadav P, et al: Secondary analysis of an electronic surveillance system combined with multi-focal interventions for early detection of sepsis. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8:47–66
28. Mani S, Ozdas A, Aliferis C, et al: Medical decision support using machine learning for early detection of late-onset neonatal sepsis. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2014; 21:326–336
29. Desautels T, Calvert J, Hoffman J, et al: Prediction of sepsis in the intensive care unit with minimal electronic health record data: A machine learning approach. JMIR Med informatics 2016; 4:e28
30. Taylor RA, Pare JR, Venkatesh AK, et al: Prediction of in-hospital mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis: A local big data-driven, machine learning approach. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23:269–278
31. Gultepe E, Green JP, Nguyen H, et al: From vital signs to clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis: A machine learning basis for a clinical decision support system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21:315–25
32. Pruinelli L, Yadav P, Hangsleben A, et al: A Data mining approach to determine sepsis guideline impact on inpatient mortality and complications. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci proceedings AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci 2016; 2016:194–202
33. Westra BL, Landman S, Yadav P, et al: Secondary analysis of an electronic surveillance system combined with multi-focal interventions for early detection of sepsis. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8:47–66
34. Austin PC: Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 2011; 30: 1292–1301
35. Kirby JC, Speltz P, Rasmussen LV, et al: PheKB: A catalog and work-flow for creating electronic phenotype algorithms for transportability. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23:1046–1052