PheKB: A catalog and workflow for creating electronic phenotype algorithms for transportability

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1046-1052

  Kirby, Jacqueline C ^a   Speltz, Peter ^a   Rasmussen, Luke V ^d   Basford, Melissa ^a   Gottesman, Omri ^b   Peissig, Peggy L ^c   Pacheco, Jennifer A ^d   Tromp, Gerard ^e   Pathak, Jyotishman ^f   Carrell, David S ^g   Ellis, Stephen B ^b   Lingren, Todd ^h   Thompson, Will K ^d   Savova, Guergana ⁱ   Haines, Jonathan ^j   Roden, Dan M ^a   Harris, Paul A ^a   Denny, Joshua C ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MARSHFIELD CLINIC   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^f MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^g GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^j CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Clinical research; Electronic health records; Electronic phenotyping; Genomic research; Natural language processing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG THERAPY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; ONLINE SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; PHENOTYPE; PUBLICATION; WORKFLOW; DATA MINING; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; GENOMICS; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE BASE; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; KNOWLEDGE BASES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84994697920     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv202     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Gottesman O, Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G, et al. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet. 2013;15:761-771.
2. Chute CG, Pathak J, Savova GK, et al. The SHARPn project on secondary use of electronic medical record data: progress, plans, and possibilities. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:248-256.
3. Richesson RL, Hammond WE, Nahm M, et al. Electronic health records based phenotyping in next-generation clinical trials: a perspective from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:e226-e231.
4. Fleurence RL, Curtis LH, Califf RM, et al. Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21:578-582.
5. Yu S, Liao KP, Shaw SY, et al. Toward high-throughput phenotyping: unbiased automated feature extraction and selection from knowledge sources [published online ahead of print April 29, 2015]. J Am Med Inform Assoc. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv034.
6. Shah NH. Mining the ultimate phenome repository. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:1095-1097.
7. Boland MR, Tatonetti NP, Hripcsak G. Development and validation of a classification approach for extracting severity automatically from electronic health records. J Biomed Semant. 2015;6:14.
8. Richesson RL, Rusincovitch SA, Wixted D, et al. A comparison of phenotype definitions for diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:e319-e326.
9. Levison J, Triant V, Losina E, et al. Development and validation of a computer-based algorithm to identify foreign-born patients with HIV infection from the electronic medical record. Appl Clin Inform. 2014;5:557-570.
10. Rosenman M, He J, Martin J, et al. Database queries for hospitalizations for acute congestive heart failure: flexible methods and validation based on set theory. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21:345-352.
11. Shah NH, LePendu P, Bauer-Mehren A, et al. Proton pump inhibitor usage and the risk of myocardial infarction in the general population. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124653.
12. Li Q, Melton K, Lingren T, et al. Phenotyping for patient safety: algorithm development for electronic health record based automated adverse event and medical error detection in neonatal intensive care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21:776-784.
13. Dubberke ER, Nyazee HA, Yokoe DS, et al. Implementing automated surveillance for tracking clostridium difficile infection at multiple healthcare facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33:305-308.
14. Lorberbaum T, Nasir M, Keiser MJ, et al. Systems pharmacology augments drug safety surveillance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97:151-158.
15. Denny JC, Crawford DC, Ritchie MD, et al. Variants near FOXE1 are associated with hypothyroidism and other thyroid conditions: using electronic medical records for genome-and phenome-wide studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89:529-542.
16. Kho AN, Pacheco JA, Peissig PL, et al. Electronic medical records for genetic research: results of the eMERGE consortium. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:79re1.
17. Ritchie MD, Denny JC, Crawford DC, et al. Robust replication of genotypephenotype associations across multiple diseases in an electronic medical record. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:560-572.
18. Peissig PL, Rasmussen LV, Berg RL, et al. Importance of multi-modal approaches to effectively identify cataract cases from electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:225-234.
19. Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Pacheco JA, Wilke RA, et al. High density GWAS for LDL cholesterol in African Americans using electronic medical records reveals a strong protective variant in APOE. Clin Transl Sci. 2012;5:394-399.
20. Namjou B, Keddache M, Marsolo K, et al. EMR-linked GWAS study: investigation of variation landscape of loci for body mass index in children. Front Genet. 2013;4:268.
21. Wei W-Q, Denny JC. Extracting research-quality phenotypes from electronic health records to support precision medicine. Genome Med. 2015;7:41.
22. Newton KM, Peissig PL, Kho AN, et al. Validation of electronic medical record-based phenotyping algorithms: results and lessons learned from the eMERGE network. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:e147-e154.
23. Kawatkar A, Chu L-H, Iyer R, et al. Development and validation of algorithms to identify acute diverticulitis [published online ahead of print September 25, 2014]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. doi:10.1002/pds.3708.
24. Ritchie MD, Denny JC, Zuvich RL, et al. Genome-and phenome-wide analyses of cardiac conduction identifies markers of arrhythmia risk. Circulation. 2013;127:1377-1385.
25. Kho AN, Hayes MG, Rasmussen-Torvik L, et al. Use of diverse electronic medical record systems to identify genetic risk for type 2 diabetes within a genome-wide association study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:212-218.
26. Carroll RJ, Thompson WK, Eyler AE, et al. Portability of an algorithm to identify rheumatoid arthritis in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:e162-e169.
27. Conway M, Berg RL, Carrell D, et al. Analyzing the heterogeneity and complexity of Electronic Health Record oriented phenotyping algorithms. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:274-283.
28. Denny JC, Ritchie MD, Basford MA, et al. PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1205-1210.
29. Ritchie MD, Verma SS, Hall MA, et al. Electronic medical records and genomics (eMERGE) network exploration in cataract: several new potential susceptibility loci. Mol Vis. 2014;20:1281-1295.
30. Yoni Halpern YC. Using anchors to estimate clinical state without labeled data. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2014;2014:606-615.
31. Savova GK, Fan J, Ye Z, et al. Discovering peripheral arterial disease cases from radiology notes using natural language processing. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010;2010:722-726.
32. Drupal. Drupal. https://www.drupal.org/. Accessed April 24 2015.
33. Fraternali P, Paolini P. Model-driven development of web applications: the AutoWeb system. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 2000;18:323-382.
34. KNIME. www.knime.org. Accessed December 28, 2015.
35. Muthalagu A, Pacheco JA, Aufox S, et al. A rigorous algorithm to detect and clean inaccurate adult height records within EHR systems. Appl Clin Inform. 2014;5:118-126.
36. Gawron AJ, Thompson WK, Keswani RN, et al. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1844-1849.
37. Tromp G, Borthwick KM, Smelser DT, et al. Ephenotyping for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the electronic medical records and genomics (emerge) network: algorithm development and Konstanz Information Miner Workflow. Int J Biomed Data Min. 2015;4:113. http://www.omicsonline.com/open-access/ephenotyping-for-abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-in-the-electronic-medical-records-and-genomics-emerge-network-algorithm-development-andkonstanz-information-miner-workflow-2090-4924-1000113. php?aid=55667. Accessed July 31, 2015.
38. Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, et al. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56:45-50.
39. Tryka KA, Hao L, Sturcke A, et al. NCBI's database of genotypes and phenotypes: dbGaP. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D975-D979.
40. Mailman MD, Feolo M, Jin Y, et al. The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1181-1186.
41. Rasmussen LV, Thompson WK, Pacheco JA, et al. Design patterns for the development of electronic health record-driven phenotype extraction algorithms [published online ahead of print June 21, 2014]. J Biomed Inform. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.06.007.
42. Archer KR, Coronado RA, Haug CM, et al. A comparative effectiveness trial of postoperative management for lumbar spine surgery: changing behavior through physical therapy (CBPT) study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:325.
43. Hripcsak G, Albers DJ. Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:117-121.
44. Denny JC. Chapter 13: mining electronic health records in the genomics era. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002823.
45. Shivade C, Raghavan P, Fosler-Lussier E, et al. A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21:221-230.
46. Liaw S-T, Taggart J, Yu H, et al. Integrating electronic health record information to support integrated care: Practical application of ontologies to improve the accuracy of diabetes disease registers. J Biomed Inform. 2014;52:364-372.
47. Roden DM, Xu H, Denny JC, et al. Electronic medical records as a tool in clinical pharmacology: opportunities and challenges. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91:1083-1086.
48. Peissig PL, Santos Costa V, Caldwell MD, et al. Relational machine learning for electronic health record-driven phenotyping. J Biomed Inform. 2014;52:260-270.
49. Thompson WK, Rasmussen LV, Pacheco JA, et al. An evaluation of the NQF Quality Data Model for representing Electronic Health Record driven phenotyping algorithms. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:911-920.
50. Kumar VD, Tipney HJ, editors. Mining the Electronic Health Record for Disease Knowledge-Springer. New York: Springer; 2014. http://link. springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-4939-0709-0_15#page-1. Accessed June 5, 2015.