COACH-D: Improved protein-ligand binding sites prediction with refined ligand-binding poses through molecular docking

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 46, Issue W1, 2018, Pages W438-W442

  Wu, Qi ^a   Peng, Zhenling ^b   Zhang, Yang ^c   Yang, Jianyi ^a  

^a NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BENCHMARKING; BINDING SITE; COACH D; CONTROLLED STUDY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN LIGAND BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; INTERNET; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BENCHMARKING; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85050892342     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky439     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Opella, S. J. (2013) Structure determination of membrane proteins by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem., 6, 305-328.
2. Leitner, A., Faini, M., Stengel, F. and Aebersold, R. (2016) Crosslinking and mass Spectrometry: An integrated technology to understand the structure and function of molecular machines. Trends Biochem. Sci., 41, 20-32.
3. Quan, S., Wang, L., Petrotchenko, E. V., Makepeace, K. A., Horowitz, S., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Borchers, C. H. and Bardwell, J. C. (2014) Super Spy variants implicate flexibility in chaperone action. Elife, 3, e01584.
4. Brylinski, M. and Skolnick, J. (2008) A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 105, 129-134.
5. Capra, J. A., Laskowski, R. A., Thornton, J. M., Singh, M. and Funkhouser, T. A. (2009) Predicting protein ligand binding sites by combining evolutionary sequence conservation and 3D structure. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000585.
6. Roy, A., Yang, J. and Zhang, Y. (2012) COFACTOR: an accurate comparative algorithm for structure-based protein function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, W471-W477.
7. Yang, J., Roy, A. and Zhang, Y. (2013) Protein-ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics, 29, 2588-2595.
8. Heo, L., Shin, W. H., Lee, M. S. and Seok, C. (2014) GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, W210-W214.
9. Roche, D. B., Buenavista, M. T. and McGuffin, L. J. (2013) The FunFOLD2 server for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, W303-W307.
10. Trott, O. and Olson, A. J. (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem., 31, 455-461.
11. Huang, S. Y. and Zou, X. (2007) Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Proteins, 66, 399-421.
12. Allen, W. J., Balius, T. E., Mukherjee, S., Brozell, S. R., Moustakas, D. T., Lang, P. T., Case, D. A., Kuntz, I. D. and Rizzo, R. C. (2015) DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance. J. Comput. Chem., 36, 1132-1156.
13. Shin, W. H. and Seok, C. (2012) GalaxyDock: protein-ligand docking with flexible protein side-chains. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 52, 3225-3232.
14. Liu, Z., Su, M., Han, L., Liu, J., Yang, Q., Li, Y. and Wang, R. (2017) Forging the basis for developing protein-ligand interaction scoring functions. Acc. Chem. Res., 50, 302-309.
15. Li, Y. and Yang, J. (2017) Structural and sequence similarity makes a significant impact on machine-learning-based scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 57, 1007-1012.
16. Haas, J., Roth, S., Arnold, K., Kiefer, F., Schmidt, T., Bordoli, L. and Schwede, T. (2013) The protein model Portal-a comprehensive resource for protein structure and model information. Database, 2013, bat031.
17. Yang, J., Yan, R., Roy, A., Xu, D., Poisson, J. and Zhang, Y. (2015) The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods, 12, 7-8.
18. Yang, J., Roy, A. and Zhang, Y. (2013) BioLiP: a semi-manually curated database for biologically relevant ligand-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D1096-D1103.
19. Rose, P. W., Prlic, A., Altunkaya, A., Bi, C., Bradley, A. R., Christie, C. H., Costanzo, L. D., Duarte, J. M., Dutta, S., Feng, Z. et al. (2017) The RCSB protein data bank: integrative view of protein, gene and 3D structural information. Nucleic Acids Res., 45, D271-D281.
20. Rego, N. and Koes, D. (2015) 3Dmol. js: molecular visualization with WebGL. Bioinformatics, 31, 1322-1324.
21. Roche, D. B., Tetchner, S. J. and McGuffin, L. J. (2010) The binding site distance test score: a robust method for the assessment of predicted protein binding sites. Bioinformatics, 26, 2920-2921.
22. Kallberg, M., Wang, H., Wang, S., Peng, J., Wang, Z., Lu, H. and Xu, J. (2012) Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat. Protoc., 7, 1511-1522.