Conjugate gradient descent learned ANN for Indian summer monsoon rainfall and efficiency assessment through Shannon-Fano coding

Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics

Volumn 179, Issue , 2018, Pages 202-205

  Chattopadhyay, Surajit ^a   Chattopadhyay, Goutami ^b  

^a AMITY UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA   (India)

Author keywords

Conjugate gradient descent algorithm; Indian summer monsoon rainfall; Neurocomputing; Shanno Fano coding

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC THERMODYNAMICS; BACKPROPAGATION ALGORITHMS; CODES (SYMBOLS); EFFICIENCY; RAIN;

CODING EFFICIENCY; CONJUGATE GRADIENT DESCENTS; EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT; INDIAN SUMMER MONSOON RAINFALL; NEUROCOMPUTING; PREDICTIVE MODELING; SHANNO-FANO CODING; SHANNON-FANO CODING;

CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD;

EID: 85050881766     PISSN: 13646826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2018.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abhishek, K., Kumar, A., Ranjan, R., Kumar, S., A rainfall prediction model using artificial neural network. Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium (ICSGRC), 2012 IEEE, 2012, July, IEEE, 82–87.
2. Acharya, N., Chattopadhyay, S., Kulkarni, M., Mohanty, U.C., A neurocomputing approach to predict monsoon rainfall in monthly scale using SST anomaly as a predictor. Acta Geophys. Pol. 60:1 (2012), 260–279.
3. Acharya, N., Shrivastava, N.A., Panigrahi, B.K., Mohanty, U.C., Development of an artificial neural network based multi-model ensemble to estimate the northeast monsoon rainfall over south peninsular India: an application of extreme learning machine. Clim. Dynam. 43:5–6 (2014), 1303–1310.
4. Acharya, N., Chattopadhyay, S., Mohanty, U.C., Ghosh, K., Prediction of Indian summer monsoon rainfall: a weighted multi-model ensemble to enhance probabilistic forecast skills. Meteorol. Appl. 21:3 (2014), 724–732.
5. Aremu, I.A., Gbolagade, K.A., RNS based on Shannon Fano coding for data encoding and decoding using {2n-1,2n,2n+1} moduli sets. Communications, 6(1), 2018, 25.
6. Bhat, A.H., Baig, M.A.K., Dar, M.H., New generalized entropy measure and its corresponding code-word length and their characterizations. International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering 6:1 (2017), 863–873.
7. Brunsell, N.A., A multiscale information theory approach to assess spatialtemporal variability of daily precipitation. J. Hydrol. 385:1–4 (2010), 165–172.
8. Cai, J., Liu, Y., Lei, T., Pereira, L.S., Estimating reference evapotranspiration with the FAO PenmanMonteith equation using daily weather forecast messages. Agric. For. Meteorol. 145:1–2 (2007), 22–35.
9. Chattopadhyay, S., Feed forward Artificial Neural Network model to predict the average summer-monsoon rainfall in India. Acta Geophys. Pol. 55:3 (2007), 369–382.
10. Chattopadhyay, S., Chattopadhyay, G., Comparative study among different neural net learning algorithms applied to rainfall time series. Meteorol. Appl. 15:2 (2008), 273–280.
11. Chin, E.H., Modeling daily precipitation occurrence process with Markov chain. Water Resour. Res. 13:6 (1977), 949–956.
12. Gardner, M.W., Dorling, S.R., Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos. Environ. 32:14–15 (1998), 2627–2636.
13. Gleick, J., Chaos: Making a New Science. 2011, Open Road Media.
14. Govindaraju, R.S., Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Eng. 5:2 (2000), 115–123.
15. Gregory, J.M., Wigley, T.M.L., Jones, P.D., Determining and interpreting the order of a two-state Markov chain: application to models of daily precipitation. Water Resour. Res. 28:5 (1992), 1443–1446.
16. Johansson, E.M., Dowla, F.U., Goodman, D.M., Backpropagation learning for multilayer feed-forward neural networks using the conjugate gradient method. Int. J. Neural Syst. 2:04 (1991), 291–301.
17. Kawachi, T., Maruyama, T., Singh, V.P., Rainfall entropy for delineation of water resources zones in Japan. J. Hydrol. 246:1–4 (2001), 36–44.
18. Kisi, Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms. J. Hydrol. Eng. 12:5 (2007), 532–539.
19. Kisi, O., Shiri, J., Tombul, M., Modeling rainfall-runoff process using soft computing techniques. Comput. Geosci. 51 (2013), 108–117.
20. Kodituwakku, S.R., Amarasinghe, U.S., Comparison of lossless data compression algorithms for text data. Indian journal of computer science and engineering 1:4 (2010), 416–425.
21. Krajci, S., Liu, C.F., Mikeš L., Moser, S.M., Performance analysis of Fano coding. Information Theory (ISIT), 2015 IEEE International Symposium on, 2015, June, IEEE, 1746–1750.
22. Kumar, K.K., Soman, M.K., Kumar, K.R., Seasonal forecasting of Indian summer monsoon rainfall: a review. Weather 50:12 (1995), 449–467.
23. Lek, S., Guégan, J.F., Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction. Ecol. Model. 120:2–3 (1999), 65–73.
24. Liu, Y., Liu, C., Wang, D., Understanding atmospheric behaviour in terms of entropy: a review of applications of the second law of thermodynamics to meteorology. Entropy 13:1 (2011), 211–240.
25. Lorenz, E.N., Haman, K., The essence of chaos. Pure Appl. Geophys. 147:3 (1996), 598–599.
26. Maqsood, I., Khan, M.R., Abraham, A., An ensemble of neural networks for weather forecasting. Neural Comput. Appl. 13:2 (2004), 112–122.
27. Masoller, C., Schifino, A.S., Romanelli, L., Characterization of strange attractors of lorenz model of general circulation of the atmosphere. Chaos, Solit. Fractals 6 (1995), 357–366.
28. Meireles, M.R., Almeida, P.E., Simes, M.G., A comprehensive review for industrial applicability of artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 50:3 (2003), 585–601.
29. Morss, R.E., Demuth, J.L., Lazo, J.K., Communicating uncertainty in weather forecasts: a survey of the US public. Weather Forecast. 23:5 (2008), 974–991.
30. Murphy, A.H., What is a good forecast?An essay on the nature of goodness in weather forecasting. Weather Forecast. 8:2 (1993), 281–293.
31. Nebot, A., Mugica, V., Escobet, A., Ozone prediction based on meteorological variables: a fuzzy inductive reasoning approach. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.(3), 2008, 12343–12370.
32. Nunnari, G., Nucifora, A.F.M., Randieri, C., The application of neural techniques to the modelling of time-series of atmospheric pollution data. Ecol. Model. 111:2–3 (1998), 187–205.
33. Oldewurtel, F., Parisio, A., Jones, C.N., Gyalistras, D., Gwerder, M., Stauch, V., Lehmann, B., Morari, M., Use of model predictive control and weather forecasts for energy efficient building climate control. Energy Build. 45 (2012), 15–27.
34. Pal, S.K., Mitra, S., Multilayer perceptron, fuzzy sets, and classification. IEEE Trans. Neural Network. 3:5 (1992), 683–697.
35. Pappenberger, F., Beven, K.J., Hunter, N.M., Bates, P.D., Gouweleeuw, B.T., Thielen, J., De Roo, A.P.J., Cascading model uncertainty from mediu m range weather forecasts (10 days) through a rainfall-runoff model to flood inundation predictions within the European Flood Forecasting System (EFFS). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 9:4 (2005), 381–393.
36. Rojas, R., Neural Networks: a Systematic Introduction. 2013, Springer Science & Business Media.
37. Roulston, M.S., Smith, L.A., Evaluating probabilistic forecasts using information theory. Mon. Weather Rev. 130:6 (2002), 1653–1660.
38. Ruck, D.W., Rogers, S.K., Kabrisky, M., Oxley, M.E., Suter, B.W., The multilayer perceptron as an approximation to a Bayes optimal discriminant function. IEEE Trans. Neural Network. 1:4 (1990), 296–298.
39. Shackley, S., Young, P., Parkinson, S., Wynne, B., Uncertainty, complexity and concepts of good science in climate change modelling: are GCMs the best tools?. Climatic Change 38:2 (1998), 159–205.
40. Shukla, J., Predictability in the midst of chaos: a scientific basis for climate forecasting. Science 282:5389 (1998), 728–731.
41. Shukla, R.P., Tripathi, K.C., Pandey, A.C., Das, I.M.L., Prediction of Indian summer monsoon rainfall using Nio indices: a neural network approach. Atmos. Res. 102:1–2 (2011), 99–109.
42. Singh, P., Borah, B., Indian summer monsoon rainfall prediction using artificial neural network. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 27:7 (2013), 1585–1599.
43. Strogatz, S.H., Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: with Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering. 2018, CRC Press.
44. Varotsos, Costas A., Tzanis, Chris G., Sarlis, Nicholas V., On the progress of the 20152016 El Nio event. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16:4 (2016), 2007–2011.
45. Varotsos, C.A., Tzanis, C., Cracknell, A.P., Precursory signals of the major El Nio southern oscillation events. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 124:3–4 (2016), 903–912.
46. Varotsos, C.A., Sarlis, N.V., Efstathiou, M., On the association between the recent episode of the quasi-biennial oscillation and the strong El Nio event. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 2017, 1–9.
47. Venkatesan, C., Raskar, S.D., Tambe, S.S., Kulkarni, B.D., Keshavamurty, R.N., Prediction of all India summer monsoon rainfall using error-back-propagation neural networks. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 62:3–4 (1997), 225–240.
48. Washington, R., Quantifying chaos in the atmosphere. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 24:4 (2000), 499–514.
49. Wilks, D.S., Multisite generalization of a daily stochastic precipitation generation model. J. Hydrol. 210:1–4 (1998), 178–191.
50. Wilks, D.S., Interannual variability and extreme-value characteristics of several stochastic daily precipitation models. Agric. For. Meteorol. 93:3 (1999), 153–169.
51. Xie, H., Ofman, L., Lawrence, G., Cone model for halo CMEs: application to space weather forecasting. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Physics, 109(A3), 2004.
52. Xu, Q., Measuring information content from observations for data assimilation: relative entropy versus Shannon entropy difference. Tellus 59:2 (2007), 198–209.
53. Zeng, X., Pielke, R.A., Eykholt, R., Chaos theory and its applications to the atmosphere. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 74:4 (1993), 631–644.