Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients with different vertical facial patterns treated with the Herbst appliance

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 154, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 238-248.e1

  Atresh, Arjun ^a   Cevidanes, Lucia H S ^b   Yatabe, Marilia ^b   Muniz, Luciana ^b   Nguyen, Tung ^c   Larson, Brent ^d   Manton, David J ^a   Schneider, Paul M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CHILD; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTICAL DIMENSION OF OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 85050675244     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.037     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Proffit, W.R., Fields, H.W., Moray, L.J., Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 13 (1998), 97–106.
2. Buschang, P.H., Martins, J., Childhood and adolescent changes of skeletal relationships. Angle Orthod 68 (1998), 199–206.
3. McNamara, J.A., Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 51 (1981), 177–202.
4. Pancherz, H., The Herbst appliance—its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 87 (1985), 1–20.
5. Keim, R.G., Gottlieb, E.L., Nelson, A.H., Vogels, D.I. 3rd, 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 42 (2008), 625–640.
6. Darendeliler, M.A., Validity of randomized clinical trials in evaluating the outcome of Class II treatment. Semin Orthod 12 (2006), 67–79.
7. Hansen, K., Pancherz, H., Hägg, U., Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 13 (1991), 471–481.
8. Nelson, B., Hansen, K., Hägg, U., Class II correction in patients treated with Class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 (2000), 142–149.
9. Cozza, P., Baccetti, T., Franchi, L., De Toffol, L., McNamara, J.A. Jr., Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 (2006), 599.e1–599.e12.
10. LeCornu, M., Cevidanes, L.H., Zhu, H., Wu, C.D., Larson, B., Nguyen, T., Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144 (2013), 818–830.
11. Baumrind, S., Miller, D., Molthen, R., The reliability of head film measurements. Am J Orthod 70 (1976), 617–644.
12. Houston, W., Lee, R., Accuracy of different methods of radiographic superimposition on cranial base structures. Eur J Orthod 7 (1985), 127–135.
13. Pittayapat, P., Bornstein, M.M., Imada, T.S., Coucke, W., Lambrichts, I., Jacobs, R., Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data. Eur J Orthod 37 (2014), 202–208.
14. Schaefer, A.T., McNamara, J.A., Franchi, L., Baccetti, T., A cephalometric comparison of treatment with the Twin-block and stainless steel crown Herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004), 7–15.
15. Pancherz, H., The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82 (1982), 104–113.
16. Franchi, L., Baccetti, T., McNamara, J.A. Jr., Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115 (1999), 429–438.
17. Waltrick, K.B., de Abreu Junior, M.J., Corrêa, M., Zastrow, M.D., D'Avila Dutra, V., Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 84 (2013), 68–77.
18. Cevidanes, L.H., Heymann, G., Cornelis, M.A., DeClerck, H.J., Tulloch, J.F., Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136 (2009), 94–99.
19. Cevidanes, L.H., Styner, M.A., Proffit, W.R., Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 (2006), 611–618.
20. Cevidanes, L.H., Oliveira, A.E., Grauer, D., Styner, M., Proffit, W.R., Clinical application of 3D imaging for assessment of treatment outcomes. Semin Orthod 17 (2011), 72–80.
21. Björk, A., Skieller, V., Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 5 (1983), 1–46.
22. Melsen, B., The cranial base: the postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material. Acta Odontol Scand, 32(Suppl 62), 1974.
23. de Oliveira Ruellas, A.C., Tonello, C., Gomes, L.R., Yatabe, M.S., Macron, L., Lopinto, J., et al. Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 149 (2016), 645–656.
24. Park, S.H., Yu, H.S., Kim, K.D., Lee, K.J., Baik, H.S., A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 (2006), 600.e23–600.e34.
25. Periago, D.R., Scarfe, W.C., Moshiri, M., Scheetz, J.P., Silveira, A.M., Farman, A.G., Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 78 (2008), 387–395.
26. Baccetti, T., Franchi, L., McNamara, J.A., The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 11 (2005), 119–129.
27. Bland, J.M., Altman, D., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327 (1986), 307–310.
28. Serbesis-Tsarudis, C., Pancherz, H., “Effective” TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment. Angle Orthod 78 (2008), 813–818.
29. VanLaecken, R., Martin, C.A., Dischinger, T., Razmus, T., Ngan, P., Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 (2006), 582–593.
30. Wigal, T.G., Dischinger, T., Martin, C., Razmus, T., Gunel, E., Ngan, P., Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: skeletal and dental changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140 (2011), 210–223.
31. Pancherz, H., Anehus-Pancherz, M., The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 (1993), 510–520.
32. Barnett, G.A., Higgins, D.W., Major, P.W., Flores-Mir, C., Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 78 (2008), 361–369.
33. Ghafari, J., Baumrind, S., Efstratiadis, S., Misinterpreting growth and treatment outcome from serial cephalographs. Clin Orthod Res 1 (1998), 102–106.
34. Ricketts, R.M., Cephalometric synthesis: an exercise in stating objectives and planning treatment with tracings of the head roentgenogram. Am J Orthod 46 (1960), 647–673.
35. Pancherz, H., Littmann, C., Morphology and position of mandible in Herbst treatment. Cephalometric analysis of changes to end of growth period. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 21 (1988), 493–513.
36. Voudouris, J.C., Woodside, D.G., Altuna, G., Angelopoulos, G., Bourque, P.J., Lacouture, C.Y., Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment, part 2. Results and conclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003), 13–29.
37. Voudouris, J.C., Woodside, D.G., Altuna, G., Kuftinec, M.M., Angelopoulos, G., Bourque, P.J., Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions during herbst treatment, part 1. New technological methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 (2003), 604–613.
38. Pancherz, H., The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod 3 (1997), 232–243.
39. Hägg, U., Change in mandibular growth direction by means of a Herbst appliance? A case report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102 (1992), 456–463.
40. Pancherz, H., Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl 15 (1982), 189–196.
41. Ruf, S., Pancherz, H., The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110 (1996), 225–229.
42. Rabie, A.B., Zhao, Z., Shen, G., Hägg, E.U., Robinson, W., Osteogenesis in the glenoid fossa in response to mandibular advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119 (2001), 390–400.
43. Woodside, D., Metaxas, A., Altuna, G., The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92 (1987), 181–198.
44. Pancherz, H., Fischer, S., Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Angle Orthod 73 (2003), 493–501.
45. Ruf, S., Pancherz, H., Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 20 (1998), 375–388.
46. Pancherz, H., Michailidou, C., Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004), 153–161.
47. Buschang, P.H., Santos-Pinto, A., Condylar growth and glenoid fossa displacement during childhood and adolescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998), 437–442.
48. Agronin, K.J., Kokich, V.G., Displacement of the glenoid fossa: a cephalometric evaluation of growth during treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 91 (1987), 42–48.