Effective TMJ and chin position changes in class II treatment: Orthodontics versus orthopedics

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 813-818

  Serbesis Tsarudis, Christos ^a   Pancherz, Hans ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Changes; Chin; Herbst; Multibracket; TMJ; Treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 50949099730     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/082707-391.1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adenwalla ST, Kronman JH, Attarzadeh F. Porion and condyle as cephalometric landmarks - an error study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:411-415.
2. Creekmore TD. Inhibition or stimulation of the vertical growth of the facial complex, its significance to treatment. Angle Orthod. 1967;37:285-297.
3. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Kohlhas P. "Effective condylar growth" and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:437-446.
4. Pancherz H, Fischer S. Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:493-501.
5. Pancherz H, Michailidou C. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:153-161.
6. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:375-388.
7. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:607-618.
8. Ruf S, Baltromejus S, Pancherz H. Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:4-11.
9. Baltromejus S, Ruf S, Pancherz H. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:627-637.
10. Ruf S, Wüsten B, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint effects of activator treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:527-540.
11. Ruf S, Bendeus M, Pancherz H, Hägg U. Dentoskeletal effects and "effective" temporomandibular joint, maxilla and chin changes in good and bad responders to van Beek activator treatment. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:64-72.
12. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Long-term TMJ effects of Herbst treatment: a clinical and MRI study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:475-483.
13. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Thomalske-Faubert C. Mandibular articular disk position changes during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal MRI study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:207-214.
14. Breitner C. Experimentelle Veränderung der mesiodistalen Beziehungen der oberen und unteren Zahnreihen. Z Stomatologie. 1930;28:134-154.
15. Breitner C. Bone changes resulting from experimental orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1940;26:521-547.
16. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Oudel C. Experimentelle Unter-suchungen zur Wirkung intraoraler Gummizüge auf den Unter- und Oberkiefer bei wachsenden und ausgewachsenen Ratten. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1981;42:209-222.
17. Parkhouse RC. Tip-Edge Orthodontics. Edinburgh: Mosby; 2003:5-200.
18. Kesling PC. Differential tooth movement Tip-Edge concept and the differential straight-arch technique. J Indian Orthod Soc. 1988;19:31-35.
19. Begg PR. Light arch wire technique employing the principles of differential force. Am J Orthod. 1961;47:30-48.
20. Begg PR. Begg Orthodontic Theory and Technique. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1971:21-22.
21. Angle EH. Some new forms of orthodontic mechanism, and the reasons for their introduction. Dent Cosmos. 1916;58:969-994.
22. Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance: origin, commentary, controversy. J Clin Orthod. 1976;10:99-114,174-195, 282-303, 360-379, 425-441, 507-529, 581-588.
23. Herbst E. Dreissigjährige Erfahrungen mit dem Retentions-Scharnier. Zahnärztl Rundschau. 1934;43:1515-1524, 1563-1568, 1611-1616.
24. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979;76:423-442.
25. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod. 1983;5:1-46.
26. Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:585-599.
27. Broadbent BH, Broadbent BHJ, Golden WH. Bolton Standards of Dentofacial Development. St Louis, Mo: Mosby;1975:28.
28. Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin Ltd; 1940:122-132.
29. Pancherz H, Littmann C. Morphologie und Lage des Unter-kiefers bei der Herbst-Behandlung. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop. 1989;4:493-513.
30. Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre-and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:209-218.