Autonomous agent that provides automated feedback improves negotiation skills

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 10948 LNAI, Issue , 2018, Pages 225-229

  Monahan, Shannon ^a   Johnson, Emmanuel ^b   Lucas, Gale ^b   Finch, James ^c   Gratch, Jonathan ^b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF PARIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated metrics; Individualized feedback; Negotiation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; FEEDBACK;

AUTOMATED FEEDBACK; AUTOMATED METRICS; NEGOTIATION; PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS; VIRTUAL AGENT;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 85049371246     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Gratch, J., DeVault, D., Lucas, G.: The benefits of virtual humans for teaching negotiation. In: Traum, D., Swartout, W., Khooshabeh, P., Kopp, S., Scherer, S., Leuski, A. (eds.) IVA 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10011, pp. 283–294. Springer, Cham (2016).https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-319-47665-0_25
2. Lin, R., Oshrat, Y., Kraus, S.: Investigating the benefits of automated negotiations in enhancing people’s negotiation skills. In: Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1, pp. 345–352. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 2009
3. Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: Experiential learning theory. In: Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, pp. 1215–1219. Springer US
4. Kelley, H.H.: A classroom study of the dilemmas in interpersonal negotiations. Berkeley Institute of International Studies, University of California (1966)
5. Johnson, E., Gratch, J., DeVault, D.: Towards an autonomous agent that provides automated feedback on students’ negotiation skills. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 410–418. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 2017
6. Rosen, Y.: Assessing students in human-to-agent settings to inform collaborative problem-solving learning. J. Educ. Meas. 54(1), 36–53 (2017)
7. Graesser, A.C., Cai, Z., Hu, X., Foltz, P.W., Greiff, S., Kuo, B.C., Shaffer, D.W.: Assessment of collaborative problem solving. Des. Recomm. Intell. Tutoring Syst. 275 (2017)
8. O’Neil, H.F., Chuang, S.S., Baker, E.L.: Computer-based feedback for computer-based collaborative problem solving. In: Ifenthaler, D., Pirnay-Dummer, P., Seel, N. (eds.) Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge, pp. 261–279. Springer, Boston (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_14
9. Hall, R.L.: Measuring legislative influence. Legis. Stud. Q. 17(2), 205–231 (1992)
10. Wunderle, W.: How to negotiate in the middle east. Mil. Rev. 87(2), 33 (2007)
11. Eisenberg, T., Lanvers, C.: What is the settlement rate and why should we care? J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 6(1), 111–146 (2009)
12. Samborn, H.V.: Vanishing trial, the. ABAJ 88, 24 (2002)
13. Movius, H.: The effectiveness of negotiation training. Negotaiation J. 24(4), 509–531 (2008)
14. Hattie, J., Timperley, H.: The power of feedback. Review of educational research 77(1), 81– 112 (2007)
15. DeVault, D., Mell, J., Gratch, J.: Toward natural turn-taking in a virtual human negotiation agent. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on Turn-taking and Coordination in Human-Machine Interaction. AAAI Press, Stanford, March 2015
16. Hartholt, A., Traum, D., Marsella, Stacy C., Shapiro, A., Stratou, G., Leuski, A., Morency, L.-P., Gratch, J.: All together now. In: Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C., Shimodaira, H. (eds.) IVA 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8108, pp. 368–381. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_33