The impact of elite frames and motivated reasoning on beliefs in a global warming conspiracy: The promise and limits of trust

Research and Politics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2017, Pages

  Saunders, Kyle L ^a  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Conspiracy theory; Elite framing; Global warming; Hoax; Motivated reasoning; Question experiment; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048851903     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20531680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2053168017717602     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bolsen TJ, Druckman N and Cook FL (2015) Citizens’, scientists’, and policy advisors’ beliefs about global warming. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658(1): 271–295.
2. Boussalis C and Coan TG (2016) Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt. Global Environmental Change 36: 89–100.
3. Brambor T, Clark WR and Golder M (2006) Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14: 63–82.
4. Brehm J and Rahn W (1997) Individual-level evidence for causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41: 999–1023. doi:10.2307/2111684
5. Clifford S, Jewell RM and Waggoner PD (2015) Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research of political ideology? Research and Politics 2(4): 1–9.
6. Druckman JN (2001) The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior 23: 225–256.
7. Douglas K and R Sutton (2015) Climate change: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71(2): 98–106.
8. Dunlap RE (2014) Global warming or climate change: Is there a difference? Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/168617/global-warming-climate-changedifference.aspx?utm_source=WWW (accessed 18 March 2016).
9. Dunlap RE and McCright A (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB and Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change London: Oxford, pp. 144–160.
10. Dunlap RE, McCright AM and Yarosh JH (2016) The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the US. Environment 58(5): 4–23.
11. Elsasser SW and Dunlap RE (2012) Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist 57(6): 754–776.
12. Feldman L, Myers TA, Hmielowski JD and Leiserowitz A (2014) The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: Testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. Journal of Communication 64(4): 590–611.
13. Fisher DR (2006) Bringing the material back in: Understanding the US position on climate change. Sociological Forum 21: 467–494.
14. Grimes DR (2016) On the viability of conspiratorial beliefs. PLoSONE 11(1). Available at: e0147905. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147905 (accessed 1 May 2017).
15. Hainmueller J, Mummolo J and Xu Y (2016) How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Available at: SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=2739221 (accessed 1 May 2017).
16. Hetherington M (1998) The political relevance of trust. American Political Science Review 92(4): 791–808.
17. Hetherington M and Rudolph TJ (2015) Why Washington Won’t Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Huff C and Tingley D (2015) Who are these people? Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research and Politics 2(3): 1–12.
19. Jolley D and Douglas K (2014) The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology 105(1): 35–56.
20. Keeley BL (1999) Of conspiracy theories. Journal of Philosophy 96(3): 109–126.
21. Kraft PW, Lodge M and Taber CS (2015) Why people ‘don’t trust the evidence’: Motivated reasoning and scientific beliefs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658(1): 121–133.
22. Krosnick JA (1991) Response strategies for coping with cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5(3): 213–236.
23. Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–498.
24. Lee JS (2003) A call for softer, greener language. The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/us/a-call-for-softer-greener-language.html. (accessed 3 January 2016).
25. Leiserowitz A, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S, Smith N, Anderson A, Roser-Renouf C and Maibach E (2014) What’s in A Name? Global Warming vs. Climate Change. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale University and George Mason University. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication-OFF/files/Global_Warming_vs_ Climate_Change_Report.pdf (accessed 21 June 2017).
26. Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE and Oberauer K (2015) The robust relationship between conspiracism and denial of (Climate) science. Psychological Science 26(5): 667–670.
27. Lodge M and Taber CS (2013) The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Luntz F (2002) The environment: A cleaner, safer, healthier America. Alexandria, VA: Luntz Research.
29. McCarty N, Poole K and Rosenthal H (2006) Polarized America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. McCright AM and Dunlap RE (2010) Anti-reflexivity: The American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate change science and policy. Theory, Culture, and Society, 27: 100–103.
31. McCright AM and Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly 52(2): 155–194.
32. Miller JM, Saunders KL and Farhart CE (2016) Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science 60: 824–844.
33. Mullinix KJ, Leeper TJ, Druckman JN and Freese J (2015) The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 109–138.
34. Nelson TE, Clawson RA and Oxley ZM (1997) ‘Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review 91(3): 567–583.
35. Nyhan B and Reifler J (2010) When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior 32(2): 303–330.
36. Ogden D (1971) The future of environmental struggle. In: Meek R and Straayer J (eds) The Politics of Neglect: The Environmental Crisis. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
37. Oliver JE and Wood TJ (2014) Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 952–966.
38. Schuldt JP, Konrath SH and Schwarz N (2011) ‘Global warming’ or ‘climate change’? Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(1): 115–124.
39. Schuldt JP, Roh S and Schwarz N (2015) Questionnaire design effects in climate change surveys: Implications for the partisan divide. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658(1): 67–85.
40. Schuman H and Presser S (1991) Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Smith N and Leiserowitz A (2012) The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis 32: 1021–1032.
42. Slothuus R (2010) When can political parties lead public opinion? Political Communication 27(2): 158–177.
43. Slothuus R and de Vreese CH (2010) Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. Journal of Politics 72(3): 630–645.
44. Sunstein CR and Vermeule A (2009) Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy 17(2): 202–227.
45. The American National Election Studies (ANES; www.election studies.org). The ANES 2012 Time Series Study [dataset]. Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and the University of Michigan [producers]. Available at: http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_timeseries_2012/anes_time-series_2012_userguidecodebook.pdf
46. Uscinski JE and Parent JM (2014) American Conspiracy Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Uscinski JE, Douglas K and Lewandowsky S (2017, in press). Conspiracy thinking and climate change beliefs. In: Nisbet M (ed.) The Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Villar A and Krosnick JA (2011) Global warming vs. climate change, taxes v. prices: Does word choice matter? Climatic Change 105(1): 1–12.
49. Whitmarsh L (2009) What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 18: 401–420.
50. Whitmarsh L (2011) Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change 21: 690–700.
51. Zaller JR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.