Corrigendum to: Citizens’, Scientists’, and Policy Advisors’ Beliefs about Global Warming (The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, (2015), 658, 1, (271-295), 10.1177/0002716214558393);Citizens’, Scientists’, and Policy Advisors’ Beliefs about Global Warming

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 658, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 271-295

  Bolsen, Toby ^a   Druckman, James N ^b   Cook, Fay Lomax ^c  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

global warming; policy advisors; politicization; scientists

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922780179     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716218811652     Document Type: Erratum

References (59)

1. Akerlof Karen,Rowan Katherine E.,Fitzgerald Dennis,Cedeno Andrew Y.Communication of climate projections in U.S. media amid politicization of model science.Nature Climate Change. 2012;2 (9): 648-54
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2014. What we know: The reality, risks, and response to climate change. Climate Science Panel. Washington, DC: AAAS. Available from http://whatweknow.aaas.org/get-the-facts.
3. Berkman Michael B.,Plutzer Eric.Defeating creationism in the courtroom, but not in the classroom.Science. 2011;331 (28): 404-405
4. Bolsen Toby.The construction of news: Energy crises, advocacy messages, and frames toward conservation.International Journal of Press / Politics. 2011;16 (2): 143-62
5. Bolsen Toby,Druckman James N.,Cook Fay Lomax.How frames can stunt support for scientific adaptations: Politicization and the status quo bias.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2014a;78 (1): 1-26
6. Bolsen Toby,Druckman James N.,Cook Fay Lomax.The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion.Political Behavior. 2014b;36 (2): 235-62
7. Borick Christopher P.,Rabe Barry G.A reason to believe: Examining the factors that determine individual views on global warming.Social Science Quarterly. 2010;91 (3): 777-800
8. Boykoff Maxwell T.Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006.Area. 2007;39:470-81
9. Brulle Robert J.,Carmichael Jason,Jenkins J. Craig.Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010.Climatic Change. 2012;114 (2): 169-88
10. Davidov Eldad,Schmidt Peter,Schwartz Shalom H.Bringing the values back in the adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008;72 (3): 420-45
11. Dietz Thomas.Bringing values and deliberation to science communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110 (3): 14081-14087
12. Douglas Mary,Wildavsky AaronRisk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkely, CA: University of California Press; 1982:
13. Druckman James N.,Peterson Erik,Slothuus Rune.How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation.American Political Science Review. 2013;107 (1): 57-79
14. Druckman James N.Stunted policy support.Nature Climate Change. 2013;3 (7): 617
15. Dunlap Riley E.,McCright Aaron M.A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change.Environment. 2008;50 (5): 26-35
16. Egan Patrick J.,Mullin Megan.Turning personal experience into political attitudes: The effect of local weather on American’s perceptions about global warming.Journal of Politics. 2012;74 (3): 796-809
17. Emanuel Ezekiel J.The future of biomedical research.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2013;309 (15): 1589-90
18. Feldman Lauren,Maibach E. W.,Roser-Renouf C.,Leiserowitz Anthony.Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC.The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2011;17 (1): 3-31
19. Gauchat Gordon.Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974–2010.American Sociological Review. 2012;77 (2): 167-87
20. Giddens AnthonyThe politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2009:
21. Hamilton Lawrence C.Education, politics, and opinions about climate change: Evidence for interaction effects.Climatic Change. 2011;104 (2): 231-42
22. Hamilton Lawrence C.,Stampone Mary D.Blowin’ in the wind: Short-term weather and belief in anthropogenic climate change.Weather, Climate, and Society. 2013;5 (2): 112-19
23. Hansen James,Sato Makiko,Ruedy Reto.Perception of climate change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109 (37): E2415-E2423
24. Hart P. Sol,Nisbet Erik C.Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies.Communication Research. 2012;39 (6): 701-23
25. Hayes Bernadette C.Gender, scientific knowledge, and attitudes toward the environment.Political Research Quarterly. 2001;54 (3): 657-71
26. Hmielowski Jay D.,Feldman Lauren,Myers Teresa A.,Leiserowitz Anthony,Maibach Edward.An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming.Public Understanding of Science. 2014;23 (7): 866-83
27. Javeline Debra.The most important topic political scientists are not studying: Adapting to climate change.Perspectives on Politics. 2014;12 (2): 420-34
28. Jones Michael D.Leading the way to compromise? Cultural theory and climate change opinion.PS. 2011;:720-25
29. Kahan Dan M.,Jenkins-Smith Hank,Braman Donald.Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.Journal of Risk Research. 2011;14 (2): 147-74
30. Kahan Dan M.,Peters Ellen,Wittlin Maggie,Slovic Paul,Ouellette Lisa L.,Braman Donald,Mandel Gregory.The polarizing impact of scientific literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks.Nature Climate Change. 2012;2 (10): 732-35
31. KrosnickJon A.2013. Red states, blue states agree on climate change. Testimony to the Bicameral Task Force on Climate Change. December12, 2013. Available from http://www.casbs.org/casbs-fellow-jon-krosnick-red-states-blue-states-agree-climate-change (accessed 3 March 2014).
32. KrosnickJon A.MacInnisBo. 2012. Trends in American public opinion on global warming policies between 2010 and 2012. Unpublished manuscript.
33. Kunda Ziva.The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin. 1990;108 (3): 480-98
34. Kunda ZivaSocial cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1999:
35. Leiserowitz Anthony,Maibach Edward,Roser-Renouf Connie,Feinberg Geoff,Rosenthal SethAmericans’ actions to limit global warming. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication; 2014:
36. Lewandowsky Stephan,Gignac Gilles E.,Vaughan Samuel.The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science.Nature Climate Change. 2013;3 (4): 399-404
37. Lupia Arthur.Communicating science in politicized environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110:14048-14054
38. Malka Ariel,Krosnick Jon A.,Langer Gary.The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking.Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of The Society for Risk Analysis. 2009;29 (5): 633-47
39. McCright Aaron.The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public.Population & Environment. 2010;32 (1): 66-87
40. McCright Aaron M.,Dunlap Riley E.The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010.Sociological Quarterly. 2011;52 (2): 155-94
41. MelilloJerry M.RichmondTerese (T. C.)YoheGary W., eds. 2014. Highlights of climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program. Available from www.nca2014.globalchange.gov.
42. MildenbergerMattoLeiserowitzAnthony. n.d. Why did public concern for climate change decline? Evidence from an opinion panel. Unpublished manuscript.
43. Nisbet Matthew C.Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement.Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2009;51 (2): 12-23
44. Nisbet Matthew C.,Myers Teresa.The polls—trends: Twenty years of public opinion about global warming.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2007;71 (3): 444-70
45. Oreskes Naomi,Conway Erik M.Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2010:
46. Petersen Michael Bang,Skøv Martin,Serritzlew Søren,Ramsøy Thomas.Motivated reasoning and political parties: Evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues.Political Behavior. 2013;35 (4): 831-54
47. Pidgeon Nick,Fischoff Baruch.The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risk.Nature Climate Change. 2011;1 (1): 35-41
48. Plutzer Eric,Maney Ardith,O’Conner Robert E.Ideology and elites’ perceptions of the safety of new technologies.American Journal of Political Science. 1998;42 (1): 190-209
49. Rothman Stanley,Lichter Robert S.Elite ideology and risk perception in nuclear energy policy.American Political Science Review. 1987;81 (2): 383-404
50. Schuldt Jonathon P.,Konrath Sarah H.,Schwarz Norbert.“Global warming” or “climate change”? Whether the planet is warm depends on question wording.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2011;75 (1): 115-24
51. Schuldt Jonathon P.,Roh Sungjong,Schwarz Norbert.Questionnaire design effects in climate change surveys: Implications for the partisan divide.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2015;:
52. Stern Paul.Psychological contributions to limiting climate change.American Psychologist. 2011;66 (4): 303-14
53. Stern Paul C.,Dietz Thomas,Guagnano Gregory A.The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context.Environment and Behavior. 1995;27 (6): 723-43
54. Taber Charles S.,Lodge Milton.Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50 (3): 755-69
55. TomzMichaelWittenbergJasonKingGary. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. Available from http://gking.harvard.edu/.
56. Weber Elke U.,Stern Paul C.Public understanding of climate change in the United States.American Psychologist. 2011;66 (4): 315-28
57. Zaller JohnThe nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1992:
58. Zhao Xiaoquan,Leiserowitz Anthony A.,Maibach Edward W.,Roser-Renouf Connie.Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support.Journal of Communication. 2011;61 (4): 713-31
59. Zia Asim,Todd Anne Marie.Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19 (6): 743-61