Rare events in the ICU: An emerging challenge in classification and prediction

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 418-424

  Leisman, Daniel E ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFIER; DEPENDENT VARIABLE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; APACHE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

APACHE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE;

EID: 85047757862     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002943     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cullen DJ, Civetta JM, Briggs BA, et al: Therapeutic intervention scoring system: A method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med 1974; 2: 57-60
2. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al: APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: A physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 1981; 9: 591-597
3. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al: APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-829
4. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36
5. Obuchowski NA: Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003; 229: 3-8
6. Sox HC, Higgins MC, Owens DK: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic information. In: Medical Decision Making, 2nd Edition. 2013, p 142
7. Hajian-Tilaki K: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med 2013; 4: 627-635
8. Badawi O, Liu X, Hassan E, et al: Evaluation of ICU Risk Models Adapted for Use as Continuous Markers of Severity of Illness Throughout the ICU Stay. Crit Care Med 2018; 46: 361-367
9. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al: 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 1082-1115
10. Bittl JA, Baber U, Bradley SM, et al: Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy: A systematic review for the 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2016; 134: E123-e155
11. Baber U, Mehran R, Giustino G, et al: Coronary thrombosis and major bleeding after PCI with drug-eluting stents: Risk scores from PARIS. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 2224-2234
12. Yeh RW, Secemsky EA, Kereiakes DJ, et al; DAPT Study Investigators: Development and validation of a prediction rule for benefit and harm of dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2016; 315: 1735-1749
13. Siu AL; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164: 279-296
14. Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, et al; American Cancer Society: Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA 2015; 314: 1599-1614
15. Mainiero MB, Lourenco A, Mahoney MC, et al: ACR appropriateness criteria breast cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13: R45-R49
16. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al: The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 801-810
17. Simpson SQ: New sepsis criteria: A change we should not make. Chest 2016; 149: 1117-1118
18. Deutschman CS: Imprecise medicine: The limitations of sepsis-3. Crit Care Med 2016; 44: 857-858
19. Davis J, Goadrich M: The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: ACM, 2006
20. Claesen M, Smet FD, Suykens JAK, et al: A robust ensemble approach to learn from positive and unlabeled data using SVM base models. Neurocomput 2015; 160: 73-84
21. Goadrich M, Oliphant L, Shavlik J: Gleaner: Creating ensembles of first-order clauses to improve recall-precision curves. Mach Learn. 2006; 64: 231-261
22. Graf E, Schmoor C, Sauerbreioor C, Sauerbrei W, et al: Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Stat Med 1999; 18: 2529-2545
23. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al: Assessing the performance of prediction models: A framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 128-138
24. Hawkins DM: The problem of overfitting. J Chem Inf Comp Sci. 2004; 44: 1-12
25. Cook NR: Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation 2007; 115: 928-935
26. Brenner H, Gefeller O: Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Stat Med 1997; 16: 981-991
27. Badawi O, Liu X, Hassan E, et al: Compare APACHE, SOFA, and the ICU Discharge Readiness Score (DRS) in various ICU populations. Available at: Https://public.tableau.com/profile/omar.badawi#!/vizhome/ComparisonofAPACHE-SOFA-DRS-v1/Story1. Accessed November 30, 2017
28. Cook NR, Ridker PM: Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: The role of reclassification measures. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 795-802
29. Alba AC, Agoritsas T, Walsh M, et al: Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: Users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA 2017; 318: 1377-1384
30. Matheny ME, Ohno-Machado L, Resnic FS: Discrimination and calibration of mortality risk prediction models in interventional cardiology. J Biomed Inform 2005; 38: 367-375
31. Maslove DM: With Severity Scores Updated on the Hour, Data Science Inches Closer to the Bedside. Crit Care Med 2018; 46: 480-481