With severity scores updated on the hour, data science inches closer to the bedside

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 480-481

  Maslove, David M ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Critical care; Data science; Forecasting; Predictive value of tests; Severity of illness index

Indexed keywords

APACHE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIG DATA; CLINICAL OUTCOME; DATA SCIENCE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIAL MEDIA;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

BIOMARKERS; DATA SCIENCE; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS;

EID: 85047724775     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002945     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Parikh RB, Kakad M, Bates DW: Integrating predictive analytics into high-value care: The dawn of precision delivery. JAMA 2016; 315:651–652
2. Badawi O, Liu X, Hassan E, et al: Evaluation of ICU Risk Models Adapted for Use as Continuous Markers of Severity of Illness Throughout the ICU Stay. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:361–367
3. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al: APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: A physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 1981; 9:591–597
4. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al: APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:818–829
5. Chang RW: Individual outcome prediction models for intensive care units. Lancet 1989; 2:143–146
6. Chang RW, Jacobs S, Lee B, et al: Predicting deaths among intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 1988; 16:34–42
7. Chang RW, Jacobs S, Lee B: Predicting outcome among intensive care unit patients using computerised trend analysis of daily Apache II scores corrected for organ system failure. Intensive Care Med 1988; 14:558–566
8. Rogers J, Fuller HD: Use of daily Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores to predict individual patient survival rate. Crit Care Med 1994; 22:1402–1405
9. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, et al: Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA 2001; 286:1754–1758
10. Wagner DP, Knaus WA, Harrell FE, et al: Daily prognostic estimates for critically ill adults in intensive care units: Results from a prospective, multicenter, inception cohort analysis. Crit Care Med 1994; 22:1359–1372
11. Afessa B, Keegan MT, Mohammad Z, et al: Identifying potentially ineffective care in the sickest critically ill patients on the third ICU day. Chest 2004; 126:1905–1909
12. Leisman D: Rare Events in the ICU: An Emerging Challenge in Classification and Prediction. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:418–424
13. Holder AL, Overton E, Lyu P, et al: Serial daily organ failure assessment beyond ICU day 5 does not independently add precision to ICU risk-of-death prediction. Crit Care Med 2017; 45:2014–2022
14. Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D: Outcome prediction for individual intensive care patients: Useful, misused, or abused? Intensive Care Med 1995; 21:770–776
15. Tableau Software: Tableau Public [Internet]. Available at: https://public.tableau.com/en-us/s/. Accessed November 20, 2017
16. Badawi O: Compare APACHE, SOFA, and the ICU Discharge Readiness Score (DRS) in various ICU populations [Internet]. Available at: https://public.tableau.com/profile/omar.badawi#!/vizhome/ComparisonofAPACHESOFA-DRS-v1/Story1. Accessed November 30, 2017
17. Van Noorden R: Data-sharing: Everything on display. Nature 2013; 500:243–245
18. Lewandowsky S, Bishop D: Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature 2016; 529:459–461