A probabilistic feature model for unfolding tested for perfect and imperfect nestings

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 414-430

  Candel, M J J M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Unfolding analysis; choice models; feature models; nestings; triadic comparisons

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031498380     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1997.1187     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. American Psychiatric Association, 1987, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Author, Washington, DC.
2. American Psychologist. 36:1981;633-638.
3. Andrich D. The application of an unfolding model of the PIRT type to the measurement of attitude. Applied Psychological Measurement. 12:1988;33-51.
4. Andrich D. A probabilistic IRT model for unfolding preference data. Applied Psychological Measurement. 13:1989;193-216.
5. Barlow R. E., Bartholomew D. J., Bremner J. M., Brunk H. D. Statistical inference under order restrictions. 1972;Wiley, London.
6. Bechtel G. G. Folded and unfolded scaling from preferential paired comparisons. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 5:1968;333-357.
7. Bossuyt P. A comparison of probabilistic unfolding theories for paired comparisons data. 1990;Springer.
8. Bossuyt P. M., Roskam E. E. Eindimensionale maximum-likelihood-Entfaltung für ein probabilistisches Modell ohne Annahmen über Verteilung. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie. 18:1987;282-294.
9. Bossuyt P. M., Roskam E. E. Maximum likelihood unidimensional unfolding for a probabilistic model without distributional assumptions. New developments in psychological choice modeling. 1989;North-Holland, Amsterdam. p. 77-98.
10. P. Buneman, 1971, The recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity, Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences, F. R. HodsonD. G. KendallP. Tautu, 387, 395, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
11. Candel M. J. J. M. The Additive Random Feature model for Unfolding and the feature structure of choice objects. Mathematical Social Sciences. 23:1992;311-342.
12. Carroll J. D., De Soete G. Fitting a quasi-poisson case of the GSTUN (General Stochastic Tree UNfolding) model and some extensions. Schader M., Gaul W. Knowledge, data and computer-assisted decisions. 1990;93-102 Springer, Berlin.
13. Colonius H., Schulze H. H. Tree structures for proximity data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 34:1979;167-180.
14. Coombs C. H. Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. Psychological Review. 57:1950;167-180.
15. Coombs C. H. On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 55:1958;1-7.
16. A theory of data. 1964;Wiley, New York.
17. Cunningham J. P. Free trees and bidirectional trees as representations of psychological distance. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 17:1978;165-188.
18. De Soete G. On some properties of dissimilarities satisfying Restle's symmetric set difference model. Psychologica Belgica. 13:1983;135-139.
19. De Soete G., Carroll J. D. Probabilistic multidimen- sional models of pairwise choice data. Ashby F. G. Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. 1992;61-88 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
20. De Soete G., Carroll J. D., DeSarbo W. S. The wandering ideal point model: A probabilistic multidimensional unfolding model for paired comparisons data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 30:1986;28-41.
21. Fishburn P. C. Binary choice probabilities: On the varieties of stochastic transitivity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 10:1973;327-352.
22. Gati I., Tversky A. Representations of qualitative and quantitative dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 8:1982;325-340.
23. Greenberg M. G. A method of successive cumulations for the scaling of pair-comparison preference judgments. Psychometrika. 30:1965;441-448.
24. Iverson G. J. Probabilistic measurement theory. Falmagne J.-C., Doignon J.-P. Mathematical psychology: Current developments. 1991;135-155 Springer, New York.
25. Iverson G. J., Harp S. A. A conditional likelihood ratio test for order restrictions in exponentional families. Mathematical Social Sciences. 14:1987;141-159.
26. Jansen P. G. W. Spezifisch objective Messung im Falle nicht-monotoner Einstellungsitems. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie. 12:1981;169-185.
27. Mood A. M., Graybill F. A., Boes D. C. Introduction to the theory of statistics. 1974.
28. Ramsay J. O. The joint analysis of direct ratings, pairwise preferences and dissimilarities. Psychometrika. 45:1980;149-166.
29. Restle F. A metric and an ordering on sets. Psychometrika. 24:1959;207-220.
30. Restle F. The psychology of judgement and choice: A theoretical essay. 1961.
31. Robertson T., Warrack G. An application of order restricted inference methodology to a problem in psychiatry. Psychometrika. 50:1985;421-427.
32. Robertson T., Wegman E. J. Likelihood ratio tests for order restrictions in exponential families. The Annals of Statistics. 6:1978;485-505.
33. Rumelhart D. L., Greeno J. G. Similarity between stimuli: An experimental test of the Luce and Restle choice models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 8:1971;370-381.
34. Schönemann P. H., Wang M.-M. An individual difference model for the multidimensional analysis of preference data. Psychometrika. 37:1972;275-309.
35. Schwarz G., Tversky A. On the reciprocity of proximity relations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 22:1980;157-175.
36. Sixtl F. Probabilistic unfolding. Psychometrika. 38:1979;235-248.
37. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review. 84:1977;327.
38. Tversky A., Gati I. Studies of similarity. Rosch E., Loyd B. B. Cognition and categorization. 1978;327-352 Erlbaum. Hillsdale.
39. Tversky A., Gati I. Similarity, separability and the triangle inequality. Psychological Review. 89:1982;123-154.
40. Tversky A., Hutchinson J. W. Nearest neighbor analysis of psychological spaces. Psychological Review. 93:1986;3-22.
41. Tversky A., Rinott Y., Newman C. M. Nearest neighbor analysis of point processes: Applications to multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 27:1983;235-250.
42. Wang M.-M., Schönemann P. H., Rusk J. G. A conjugate gradient algorithm for the multidimensional analysis of preference data. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 10:1975;45-99.
43. Zinnes J. L., Griggs R. A. Probabilistic multidimensional unfolding analysis. Psychometrika. 39:1974;327-350.