Dissociation between Location and Shape in Visual Space

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1202-1212

  Loomis, Jack M ^a   Zahorik, Pavel ^b,c   Philbeck, John W ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d University of Wisconsin ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 85047673576     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1202     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Landgraf, J. Z. (1990). Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 349-359.
2. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
3. Amorim, M.-A., Loomis, J. M., & Fukusima, S. S. (1998). Reproduction of object shape is more accurate without the continued availability of visual information. Perception, 27, 69-86.
4. Baird, J. C., & Biersdorf, W. R. (1967). Quantitative functions for size and distance judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 161-166.
5. Beck, J., & Gibson, J. J. (1955). The relation of apparent shape to apparent slant in the perception of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 125-133.
6. Beusmans, J. M. H. (1998). Optic flow and the metric of the visual ground plane. Vision Research, 38, 1153-1170.
7. Bhalla, M., & Proffitt, D. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1076-1096.
8. Bingham, G. (2001, May). Distortions of distance and shape do not reflect a single common transformation on reach space. Paper presented at the meeting of the Visual Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
9. Bridgeman, B. (1999). Separate representations of visual space for perception and visually guided behavior. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müesseler (Eds). Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 3-13). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Bridgeman, B., Peery, S., & Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
11. Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (1998). Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 22-36.
12. Crowell, J. A., Todd, J. T., & Bingham, G. P. (2001, May). Distinct perceptual representations for visually-guided reaches. Paper presented at the meeting of the Visual Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
13. Da Silva, J. A. (1985). Scales for perceived egocentric distance in a large open field: Comparison of three psychophysical methods. American Journal of Psychology, 98, 119-144.
14. Elliott, D. (1986). Continuous visual information may be important after all: A failure to replicate Thomson (1983). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 388-391.
15. Elliott, D. (1987). The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 476-485.
16. Foley, J. M. (1977). Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance. Perception, 6, 449-460.
17. Foley, J. M. (1980). Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87, 411-434.
18. Foley, J. M. (1985). Binocular distance perception: Egocentric distance tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 133-148.
19. Foley, J. M. (1991). Binocular space perception. In J. R. Cronly-Dillon (Series Ed.) & D. Regan (Vol. Ed.) Vision and visual dysfunction: Vol. 9. Binocular vision. (pp. 75-92). New York: Macmillan.
20. Foley, J. M., Ribeiro-Filho, J. P., & Da Silva, J. A. (2001). Visual localization and the metric of visual space in multi-cue conditions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 42, S939.
21. Fukusima, S. S., Loomis, J. M., & Da Silva, J. A. (1997). Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 86-100.
22. Gibson, J. J. (1950a). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23. Gibson, J. J. (1950b). The perception of visual surfaces. American Journal of Psychology, 63, 367-384.
24. Gibson, J. J., & Cornsweet, J. (1952). The perceived slant of visual surfaces - Optical and geographical. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 11-15.
25. Gilinsky, A. S. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 58, 460-482.
26. Gillam, B. (1981). False perspectives. Perception, 10, 313-318.
27. Gillam, B. (1998). Illusions at century's end. In J. Hochberg (Ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end (pp. 95-136). New York: Academic Press.
28. Gillam, B., & Chambers, D. (1985). Size and position are incongruous: Measurements on the Müller-Lyer figure. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 549-556.
29. Gogel, W. C. (1965). Equidistance tendency and its consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 153-163.
30. Gogel, W. C. (1990). A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 105-123.
31. Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122-136.
32. Hecht, H., van Doorn, A., & Koenderink, J. J. (1999). Compression of visual space in natural scenes and in their photographic counterparts. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1269-1286.
33. Joynson, R. B., & Newson, L. J. (1962). The perception of shape as a function of inclination. British Journal of Psychology, 53, 1-15.
34. Kaiser, P. K. (1967). Perceived shape and its dependency on perceived slant. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 345-353.
35. Levin, C. A., & Haber, R. N. (1993). Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 250-259.
36. Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 906-921.
37. Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Philbeck, J. W., & Fukusima, S. S. (1996). Visual perception of location and distance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 72-77.
38. Loomis, J. M., Klatsky, R. L., Philbeck, J. W., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 966-980.
39. Loomis, J. M., & Knapp, J. M. (in press). Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L. J. Hettinger & M. W. Haas (Eds.), Virtual and adaptive environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Loomis, J. M., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 397-402.
41. Mack, A., Heuer, F., Villardi, K., & Chambers, D. (1985). The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 335-344.
42. MacLeod, D. I. A., & Willen, J. D. (1995). Is there a visual space? In R. D. Luce, M. D'Zmura, D. D. Hoffman, G. J. Iverson, & A. K. Romney (Eds.), Geometric representations of perceptual phenomena: Papers in honor of Tarow Indow on his 70th birthday (pp. 47-60). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Marotta, J. J., Behrmann, M., & Goodale, M. A. (1997). The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research, 116, 113-121.
44. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Tittle, J. S. (1996). The visual perception of three-dimensional length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 173-186.
46. Ooi, T. L., Wu, B., & He, Z. J. (2001, November 8). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature, 414, 197-200.
47. Philbeck, J. W. (1997). Processes underlying apparently paradoxical indications of extent. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Santa Barbara.
48. Philbeck, J. W. (2000). Visually directed walking to briefly glimpsed targets is not biased toward fixation location. Perception, 29, 259-272.
49. Philbeck, J. W., & Loomis, J. M. (1997). Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 72-85.
50. Philbeck, J. W., Loomis, J. M., & Beall, A. C. (1997). Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 601-612.
51. Pizlo, Z. (1994). A theory of shape constancy based on perspective invariants. Vision Research, 34, 1637-1658.
52. Pizlo, Z., & Stevenson, A. K. (1999). Shape constancy from novel views. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1299-1307.
53. Post, R. B., & Welch, R. B. (1996). Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions? Perception, 25, 569-581.
54. Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., & Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409-428.
55. Purdy, W. C. (1960). The hypothesis of psychophysical correspondence (General Electric Tech. Rep. No. R60ELC56). New York: General Electric.
56. Ribeiro, N. P., Fukusima, S. S., & Da Silva, J. A. (1995, November). Size and distance perception in an environmental layout. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
57. Rieser, J. J., Ashmead, D. H., Talor, C. R., & Youngquist, G. A. (1990). Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception, 19, 675-689.
58. Sedgwick, H. A. (1983). Environment-centered representation of spatial layout: Available visual information from texture and perspective. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (pp. 425-458). New York: Academic Press.
59. Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. I. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 21.1-21.57). New York: Wiley.
60. Servos, P. (2000). Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems. Experimental Brain Research, 130, 35-47.
61. Servos, P., & Goodale, M. A. (1994). Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 119-127.
62. Sinai, M. J., Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (1998, October 1). Terrain influences the accurate judgment of distance. Nature, 395, 497-500.
63. Steenhuis, R. E., & Goodale, M. A. (1988). The effects of time and distance on accuracy of target-directed locomotion: Does an accurate short-term memory for spatial location exist? Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 399-415.
64. Thomson, J. A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 427-443.
65. Thouless, R. H. (1931). Phenomenal regression to the real object. British Journal of Psychology, 21, 338-359.
66. Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 663-678.
67. Todd, J. T., Tittle, J. S., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception, 24, 75-86.
68. Toye, R. C. (1986). The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 85-92.
69. Vishton, P. M., Rea, J. G., Cutting, J. E., & Nuñez, L. N. (1999). Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1659-1672.
70. Wagner, M. (1985). The metric of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 483-495.
71. Wallach, H., & Moore, M. E. (1962). The role of slant in the perception of shape. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 285-293.
72. Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
73. Weiskrantz, L. (1990). Outlooks for blindsight: Explicit methodologies for implicit processes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 239, 247-278.
74. Wender, K. F. (1999, November). Estimating egocentric and exocentric distances. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.