The impact of different urban dynamics on green space availability: A multiple scenario modeling approach for the region of Munich, Germany

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 93, Issue , 2018, Pages 1-12

  Xu, Chao ^a   Haase, Dagmar ^b,c   Pauleit, Stephan ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Green space availability; Housing demand; Scenario modeling; Urban dynamics; Urban growth form; Urban spatial structure

Indexed keywords

AVAILABILITY; COMMERCE; DYNAMICS; REGIONAL PLANNING; URBAN GROWTH;

GREEN SPACE AVAILABILITY; GREEN SPACES; GROWTH FORM; HOUSING DEMAND; MODELING APPROACH; MONOCENTRIC; SCENARIO MODELS; URBAN DYNAMICS; URBAN GROWTH FORM; URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURES;

HOUSING;

GREENSPACE; GROWTH FORM; HOUSING; MODELING; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; TRADE-OFF; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN SYSTEM; URBANIZATION;

BAVARIA; GERMANY; MUNICH;

EID: 85046343432     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.058     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Badiu, D.L., Iojă, C.I., Pătroescu, M., Breuste, J., Artmann, M., Niță, M.R., Grădinaru, S.R., Hossu, C.A., Onose, D.A., Is urban green space per capita a valuable target to achieve cities’ sustainability goals? Romania as a case study. Ecol. Ind. 70 (2016), 53–66.
2. Barredo, J.I., Kasanko, M., McCormick, N., Lavalle, C., Modelling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape Urban Plann. 64 (2003), 145–160.
3. Bijker, R.A., Sijtsma, F.J., A portfolio of natural places: using a participatory GIS tool to compare the appreciation and use of green spaces inside and outside urban areas by urban residents. Landscape Urban Plann. 158 (2017), 155–165.
4. Chen, H., Jia, B., Lau, S.S.Y., Sustainable urban form for Chinese compact cities: challenges of a rapid urbanized economy. Habitat Int. 32 (2008), 28–40.
5. Chiesura, A., The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape Urban Plann. 68 (2004), 129–138.
6. Cowling, R.M., Egoh, B., Knight, A.T., O'Farrell, P.J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Roux, D.J., Welz, A., Wilhelm-Rechman, A., An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 (2008), 9483–9488.
7. de la Barrera, F., Reyes-Paecke, S., Banzhaf, E., Indicators for green spaces in contrasting urban settings. Ecol. Ind. 62 (2016), 212–219.
8. Deutscher Rat für Landespflege, Durch doppelte Innenentwicklung Freiraumqualitäten erhalten. Freiraumqualitäten in der zukünftigen Stadtentwicklung. Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege 78 (2006), 5–39.
9. EEA, 2006. Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge (EEA Report No 10/2006), European Environment Agency, Copehnagen.
10. Ewing, R., Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable?. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 63 (1997), 107–126.
11. Frenkel, A., Israel, E., Spatial inequality in the context of city-suburb cleavages–Enlarging the framework of well-being and social inequality. Landscape Urban Plann., 2017 In press.
12. Fuller, R.A., Gaston, K.J., The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biol. Lett. 5 (2009), 352–355.
13. García-Ayllón, S., Rapid development as a factor of imbalance in urban growth of cities in Latin America: a perspective based on territorial indicators. Habitat Int. 58 (2016), 127–142.
14. García-Ayllón, S., Retro-diagnosis methodology for land consumption analysis towards sustainable future scenarios: Application to a mediterranean coastal area. J. Cleaner Prod., 2018.
15. García-Ayllón, S., Urban transformations as indicators of economic change in post-communist Eastern Europe: territorial diagnosis through five case studies. Habitat Int. 71 (2018), 29–37.
16. Goebel, V., Thierstein, A., Lüthi, S., 2007. Functional polycentricity in the mega-city region of Munich, Conference Paper Annual Meeting of the Association of European Planning (AESOP), Napoli, Italy.
17. Haaland, C., van den Bosch, C.K., Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: a review. Urban For. Urban Greening 14 (2015), 760–771.
18. Haase, D., Reflections on urban landscapes, ecosystems services and nature-based solutions in cities. Plann. Theory Pract. 17 (2016), 276–280.
19. Haase, D., Haase, A., Kabisch, N., Kabisch, S., Rink, D., Actors and factors in land-use simulation: the challenge of urban shrinkage. Environ. Modell. Software 35 (2012), 92–103.
20. Haase, D., Kabisch, N., Haase, A., Endless urban growth? On the mismatch of population, household and urban land area growth and its effects on the urban debate. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e66531.
21. Haase, D., Lautenbach, S., Seppelt, R., Modeling and simulating residential mobility in a shrinking city using an agent-based approach. Environ. Modell. Software 25 (2010), 1225–1240.
22. Haase, D., Nuissl, H., Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy?: the case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870–2003. Landscape Urban Plann. 80 (2007), 1–13.
23. Haase, D., Schwarz, N., Simulation models on human-nature interactions in urban landscapes: a review including spatial economics, system dynamics, cellular automata and agent-based approaches. Living Rev. Landscape Res. 3 (2009), 1–45.
24. Haase, D., Schwarz, N., Strohbach, M., Kroll, F., Seppelt, R., Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecol. Soc., 17, 2012.
25. Han, J., Hayashi, Y., Cao, X., Imura, H., Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: a case study of Shanghai, China. Landscape Urban Plann. 91 (2009), 133–141.
26. Handley, J., Pauleit, S., Slinn, P., Barber, A., Baker, M., Jones, C., Lindley, S., 2003. Accessible natural green space standards in towns and cities: a review and toolkit for their implementation, English nature research reports, Report no. 526.
27. He, J., Yi, H., Liu, J., Urban green space recreational service assessment and management: a conceptual model based on the service generation process. Ecol. Econ. 124 (2016), 59–68.
28. Hollander, J.B., Pallagst, K., Schwarz, T., Popper, F.J., Planning shrinking cities. Prog. Plann. 72 (2009), 223–232.
29. Jim, C.Y., Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities 21 (2004), 311–320.
30. Jim, C.Y., Chen, W.Y., Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou (China). J. Environ. Manage. 88 (2008), 665–676.
31. Jim, C.Y., Chen, W.Y., Pattern and divergence of tree communities in Taipei's main urban green spaces. Landscape Urban Plann. 84 (2008), 312–323.
32. Kabisch, N., Haase, D., Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape Urban Plann. 122 (2014), 129–139.
33. Kabisch, N., Strohbach, M., Haase, D., Kronenberg, J., Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecol. Ind. 70 (2016), 586–596.
34. Kain, J.-H., Larondelle, N., Haase, D., Kaczorowska, A., Exploring local consequences of two land-use alternatives for the supply of urban ecosystem services in Stockholm year 2050. Ecol. Ind. 70 (2016), 615–629.
35. Kuo, F.E., Bacaicoa, M., Sullivan, W.C., Transforming inner-city landscapes: trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environ. Behav. 30 (1998), 28–59.
36. La Greca, P., Barbarossa, L., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Martinico, F., The density dilemma. A proposal for introducing smart growth principles in a sprawling settlement within Catania Metropolitan Area. Cities 28 (2011), 527–535.
37. Larondelle, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Haase, D., Mapping transition potential with stakeholder- and policy-driven scenarios in Rotterdam City. Ecol. Ind. 70 (2016), 630–643.
38. Lauf, S., Haase, D., Hostert, P., Lakes, T., Kleinschmit, B., Uncovering land-use dynamics driven by human decision-making – a combined model approach using cellular automata and system dynamics. Environ. Modell. Software 27 (2012), 71–82.
39. Lauf, S., Haase, D., Kleinschmit, B., Linkages between ecosystem services provisioning, urban growth and shrinkage – a modeling approach assessing ecosystem service trade-offs. Ecol. Ind. 42 (2014), 73–94.
40. Lauf, S., Haase, D., Seppelt, R., Schwarz, N., Simulating demography and housing demand in an urban region under scenarios of growth and shrinkage. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 39 (2012), 229–246.
41. Li, B., Chen, D., Wu, S., Zhou, S., Wang, T., Chen, H., Spatio-temporal assessment of urbanization impacts on ecosystem services: Case study of Nanjing City, China. Ecol. Ind. 71 (2016), 416–427.
42. Lin, B., Meyers, J., Barnett, G., Understanding the potential loss and inequities of green space distribution with urban densification. Urban For. Urban Greening 14 (2015), 952–958.
43. Liu, J., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R., Luck, G.W., Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421 (2003), 530–533.
44. Liu, X., Wang, M., How polycentric is urban China and why? A case study of 318 cities. Landscape Urban Plann. 151 (2016), 10–20.
45. Margaritis, E., Kang, J., Relationship between green space-related morphology and noise pollution. Ecol. Ind. 72 (2017), 921–933.
46. Martins, H., Urban compaction or dispersion? An air quality modelling study. Atmos. Environ. 54 (2012), 60–72.
47. McDonald, R.I., Forman, R.T.T., Kareiva, P., Open space loss and land inequality in United States' cities, 1990–2000. PLoS One, 5, 2010, e9509.
48. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Ene, E., 2012. FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
49. Meijers, E., Romein, A., Realizing potential: building regional organizing capacity in polycentric urban regions. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. 10 (2003), 173–186.
50. Milder, J., Sustainable urban form. van Bueren, E., van Bohemen, H., Itard, L., Visscher, H., (eds.) Sustainable Urban Environments: An Ecosystem Approach, 2012, Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, 263–284.
51. Nassauer, J.I., Raskin, J., Urban vacancy and land use legacies: a frontier for urban ecological research, design, and planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 125 (2014), 245–253.
52. Nielsen, A.B., van den Bosch, M., Maruthaveeran, S., van den Bosch, C.K., Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst. 17 (2014), 305–327.
53. Nilsson, K., Nielsen, T.S., Aalbers, C., Bell, S., Boitier, B., Chery, J.P., Fertner, C., Groschowski, M., Haase, D., Loibl, W., Pauleit, S., Pintar, M., Piorr, A., Ravetz, J., Ristimäki, M., Rounsevell, M., Tosics, I., Westerink, J., Zasada, I., Strategies for sustainable urban development and urban-rural linkages, research briefings. Eur. J. Spatial Dev., 2014 25 p.
54. Nilsson, K., Pauleit, S., Bell, S., Aalbers, C., Nielsen, T.A.S., Peri-Urban Futures: Scenarios and Models for Land Use Change in Europe. 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
55. Nuissl, H., Haase, D., Lanzendorf, M., Wittmer, H., Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions—a context-sensitive approach. Land Use Policy 26 (2009), 414–424.
56. Overmars, K.P., de Koning, G.H.J., Veldkamp, A., Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land use models. Ecol. Model. 164 (2003), 257–270.
57. Pauleit, S., Duhme, F., Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 52 (2000), 1–20.
58. Pauleit, S., Ennos, R., Golding, Y., Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change—a study in Merseyside, UK. Landscape Urban Plann. 71 (2005), 295–310.
59. Rahman, M.A., Moser, A., Rötzer, T., Pauleit, S., Within canopy temperature differences and cooling ability of Tilia cordata trees grown in urban conditions. Build. Environ. 114 (2017), 118–128.
60. Rall, E.L., Haase, D., Creative intervention in a dynamic city: a sustainability assessment of an interim use strategy for brownfields in Leipzig, Germany. Landscape Urban Plann. 100 (2011), 189–201.
61. Ravetz, J., Fertner, C., Nielsen, T.S., The dynamics of peri-urbanization. Nilsson, K., Pauleit, S., Bell, S., Aalbers, C., Sick Nielsen, T.A., (eds.) Peri-Urban Futures: Scenarios and Models for Land Use Change in Europe, 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 13–44.
62. Reed, M.S., Kenter, J., Bonn, A., Broad, K., Burt, T.P., Fazey, I.R., Fraser, E.D.G., Hubacek, K., Nainggolan, D., Quinn, C.H., Stringer, L.C., Ravera, F., Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. J. Environ. Manage. 128 (2013), 345–362.
63. Richards, D.R., Passy, P., Oh, R.R.Y., Impacts of population density and wealth on the quantity and structure of urban green space in tropical Southeast Asia. Landscape Urban Plann. 157 (2017), 553–560.
64. RPV, Regionalplan München Karte 1 Raumstruktur. Retrieved from: http://www.region-muenchen.com/regplan/rplan.htm, 2005.
65. Schipperijn, J., Ekholm, O., Stigsdotter, U.K., Toftager, M., Bentsen, P., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., Randrup, T.B., Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey. Landscape Urban Plann. 95 (2010), 130–137.
66. Schwarz, N., Haase, D., Seppelt, R., Omnipresent sprawl? A review of urban simulation models with respect to urban shrinkage. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 37 (2010), 265–283.
67. Seto, K.C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B., Reilly, M.K., A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS One, 6, 2011, e23777.
68. Shaw, D., Sykes, O., The concept of polycentricity in European spatial planning: reflections on its interpretation and application in the practice of spatial planning. Int. Plann. Stud. 9 (2004), 283–306.
69. Strohbach, M.W., Haase, D., Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: analysis of patterns in a European city. Landscape Urban Plann. 104 (2012), 95–104.
70. Sushinsky, J.R., Rhodes, J.R., Possingham, H.P., Gill, T.K., Fuller, R.A., How should we grow cities to minimize their biodiversity impacts?. Glob. Change Biol. 19 (2013), 401–410.
71. Tan, P.Y., Wang, J., Sia, A., Perspectives on five decades of the urban greening of Singapore. Cities 32 (2013), 24–32.
72. Troupin, D., Carmel, Y., Landscape patterns of development under two alternative scenarios: implications for conservation. Land Use Policy 54 (2016), 221–234.
73. Westerink, J., Haase, D., Bauer, A., Ravetz, J., Jarrige, F., Aalbers, C.B.E.M., Dealing with sustainability trade-offs of the compact city in peri-urban planning across european city regions. Eur. Plann. Stud. 21 (2013), 473–497.
74. Wolff, M., Haase, A., Haase, D., Kabisch, N., The impact of urban regrowth on the built environment. Urban Stud. 54 (2017), 2683–2700.
75. Wu, F., Yeh, A.G.-O., Urban spatial structure in a transitional economy. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 65 (1999), 377–394.
76. Xiao, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Z., Tang, Z., An assessment of urban park access in Shanghai – implications for the social equity in urban China. Landscape Urban Plann. 157 (2017), 383–393.
77. Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Du, G., Quantifying spatio-temporal patterns of urban expansion in Beijing during 1985–2013 with rural-urban development transformation. Land Use Policy 74 (2018), 220–230.
78. Zölch, T., Henze, L., Keilholz, P., Pauleit, S., Regulating urban surface runoff through nature-based solutions – an assessment at the micro-scale. Environ. Res. 157 (2017), 135–144.
79. Zhao, J., Chen, S., Jiang, B., Ren, Y., Wang, H., Vause, J., Yu, H., Temporal trend of green space coverage in China and its relationship with urbanization over the last two decades. Sci. Total Environ. 442 (2013), 455–465.