Exploring local consequences of two land-use alternatives for the supply of urban ecosystem services in Stockholm year 2050

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 70, Issue , 2016, Pages 615-629

  Kain, Jaan Henrik ^a   Larondelle, Neele ^b,c   Haase, Dagmar ^b,d   Kaczorowska, Anna ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^d HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Land use options; Service Providing Elements; Synergies and trade offs; Urban ecosystem services; Urban land use; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; COMMERCE; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MAPPING; PLANNING; THERMAL PROCESSING (FOODS); URBAN PLANNING;

AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS; DIFFERENT SCALE LEVELS; RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES; SERVICE-PROVIDING; SURROUNDING REGIONS; TRADE OFF; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN LAND USE;

LAND USE;

AIR QUALITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; NEIGHBORHOOD; POLICY MAKING; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

STOCKHOLM [SWEDEN]; SWEDEN;

EID: 84962438939     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.062     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Ahern, J., Cilliers, S., Niemelä, J., The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: a framework for supporting innovation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 125 (2014), 254–259.
2. Alberti, M., The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 28 (2005), 168–192.
3. Andersson, E., McPhearson, T., Kremer, P., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Haase, D., Tuvendal, M., Wurster, D., Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosyst. Serv. 12 (2015), 157–164.
4. Apitz, S.E., Ecosystem services and environmental decision making: seeking order in complexity. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 9 (2012), 214–230.
5. Arnberger, A., Urban densification and recreational quality of public urban green spaces – a Viennese case study. Sustainability 4 (2012), 703–720.
6. Bagstad, K.J., Semmens, D.J., Waage, S., Winthrop, R., A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosyst. Serv. 5 (2013), 27–39.
7. Batty, M., Great planning disasters. Tewdwr-Jones, M., Phelps, N., Freestone, R., (eds.) The Planning Imagination: Peter Hall and the Study of Urban and Regional Planning, 2014, Routledge, London and New York, 28–39.
8. Bennett, E.M., Peterson, G.D., Gordon, L.J., Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 12 (2009), 1394–1404.
9. Björnsson, L., Energigrödor för biogasproduktion: Del 1, Odling och arealeffektivitet. 2012, Institutionen för Teknik och Samhälle, Lunds universitet.
10. Bolund, P., Hunhammar, S., Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol. Econ. 29:2 (1999), 293–301.
11. Bowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T.M., Pullin, A.S., Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landsc. Urban Plan. 97 (2010), 147–155.
12. Brack, C.L., Pollution mitigation and carbon sequestration by an urban forest. Environ. Pollut. 116 (2002), S195–S200.
13. Breuste, J., Haase, D., Elmqvist, T., Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. Sandhu, H., Wratten, S., Cullen, R., Costanza, R., (eds.) Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Urban Landscapes, 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 83–104.
14. Breuste, J.r., Qureshi, S., Li, J., Applied urban ecology for sustainable urban environment. Urban Ecosyst. 16 (2013), 675–680.
15. Bruce, Å., Egonsson, D., Karlsson, T., Pettersson, O., Vegan – vegeterian – allätare? SLU Kontakt. 1997.
16. Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., Müller, F., Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands – concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landsc. Online 34 (2014), 1–32.
17. Busch, M., La Notte, A., Laporte, V., Erhard, M., Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 21 (2012), 89–103.
18. Calvet-Mir, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Reyes-García, V., Beyond food production: ecosystem services provided by home gardens. A case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Northeastern Spain. Ecol. Econ. 74 (2012), 153–160.
19. Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., Agrimi, M., Portoghesi, L., Semenzato, P., Sanesi, G., Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 134 (2015), 221–228.
20. Castro, A.J., Verburg, P.H., Martín-López, B., Garcia-Llorente, M., Cabello, J., Vaughn, C.C., López, E., Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: a landscape-scale spatial analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 132 (2014), 102–110.
21. Chiesura, A., The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc. Urban Plan. 68 (2004), 129–138.
22. Colding, J., Local assessment of Stockholm: revisiting the Stockholm urban assessment. Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C., (eds.) Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities – A Global Assessment, 2013, Springer, Dordrecht, 313–335.
23. Crossman, N.D., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Willemen, L., Petz, K., Palomo, I., Drakou, E.G., Martín-Lopez, B., McPhearson, T., Boyanova, K., Alkemade, R., Egoh, B., Dunbar, M.B., Maes, J., A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 4 (2013), 4–14.
24. du Plessis, C., Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2012), 7–22.
25. EEA, Urban Atlas. 2010, The European Environment Agency.
26. Eigenbrod, F., Armsworth, P.R., Anderson, B.J., Heinemeyer, A., Gillings, S., Roy, D.B., Thomas, C.D., Gaston, K.J., The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 47 (2010), 377–385.
27. Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C., Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment. 2013, Springer, Dordrecht.
28. Elmqvist, T., Redman, C.L., Barthel, S., Costanza, R., History of urbanization and the missing ecology. Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C., (eds.) Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities – A Global Assessment, 2013, Springer, Dordrecht, 13–30.
29. Escobedo, F.J., Nowak, D.J., Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Landsc. Urban Plan. 90 (2009), 102–110.
30. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Human Energy Requirements: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation, Rome, 17–24 October 2001, Food and Nutrition Technical Report Series Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome., 2004.
31. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Global Food Losses and Food Waste – Extent, Causes and Prevention, Rome. 2011.
32. Goddard, M.A., Dougill, A.J., Bento, T.G., Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25 (2009), 90–98.
33. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D.N., Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86 (2013), 235–245.
34. Haase, D., Haase, A., Rink, D., Conceptualizing the nexus between urban shrinkage and ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 132 (2014), 159–169.
35. Haase, D., Nuissl, H., The urban-to-rural gradient of land use change and impervious cover: a long-term trajectory for the city of Leipzig. J. Land Use Sci. 5 (2010), 123–141.
36. Haase, D., Schwarz, N., Strohbach, M., Kroll, F., Seppelt, R., Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig–Halle Region, Germany. Ecol. Soc., 17(3), 2012, 22.
37. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Kienast, F., Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecol. Indic. 21 (2012), 39–53.
38. Hamin, E.M., Gurran, N., Urban form and climate change: balancing adaptation and mitigation in the U.S. and Australia. Habitat Int. 33 (2009), 238–245.
39. Handel, S.N., Saito, O., Takeuchi, K., Restoration ecology in an urbanizing world. Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C., (eds.) Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities – A Global Assessment, 2013, Springer, Dordrecht, 665–698.
40. Hansen, R., Pauleit, S., From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. Ambio 43 (2014), 516–529.
41. Hilde, T., Paterson, R., Integrating ecosystem services analysis into scenario planning practice: accounting for street tree benefits with i-Tree valuation in Central Texas. J. Environ. Manage. 146 (2014), 524–534.
42. Hofstad, H., Compact city development: high ideals and emerging practices. Eur. J. Spatial Dev., 2012.
43. Hou, Y., Burkhard, B., Müller, F., Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 127 (2013), S117–S131.
44. Ignatieva, M., Ahrné, K., Biodiverse green infrastructure for the 21st century: from green desert of lawns to biophilic cities. J. Archit. Urban 37 (2013), 1–9.
45. Kabisch, N., Haase, D., Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landsc. Urban Plan., 2014, 129–139.
46. Kaczorowska, A., Kain, J.-H., Kronenberg, J., Haase, D., Ecosystem services in urban land use planning: integration challenges in complex urban settings – case of Stockholm. Ecosyst. Serv., 2015, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.006.
47. Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R., Boucher, T., Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science 316 (2007), 1866–1869.
48. Kattel, G.R., Elkadi, H., Meikle, H., Developing a complementary framework for urban ecology. Urban For. Urban Green. 12 (2013), 498–508.
49. Keeley, M., The Green Area Ratio: an urban site sustainability metric. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 54 (2011), 937–958.
50. Keniger, E.L., Gaston, K.J., Irvine, K.N., Fuller, R.A., What are the benefits of interacting with nature?. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10 (2013), 913–935.
51. Kirby, K.R., Potvin, C., Variation in carbon storage among tree species: implications for the management of a small-scale carbon sink project. For. Ecol. Manage. 246 (2007), 208–221.
52. Larondelle, N., Haase, D., Valuing post-mining landscapes using an ecosystem services approach – an example from Germany. Ecol. Indic. 18 (2012), 567–574.
53. Larondelle, N., Haase, D., Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural–urban gradient: a cross-analysis of European cities. Ecol. Indic. 29 (2013), 179–190.
54. Larondelle, N., Franzeskaki, N., Haase, D., Mapping transition potential with stakeholder and policy-driven scenarios in Rotterdam City. Ecol. Indic. 70 (2016), 630–643.
55. Lauf, S., Haase, D., Kleinschmit, B., Linkages between ecosystem services provisioning, urban growth and shrinkage – a comparative modeling approach assessing ecosystem service trade-offs. Land Use Policy 52 (2016), 240–254.
56. Lee, A.C.K., Maheswaran, R., The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J. Public Health 33:2 (2011), 212–222.
57. Lennon, M., Scott, M., Delivering ecosystems services via spatial planning: reviewing the possibilities and implications of a green infrastructure approach. Town Plan. Rev. 85 (2014), 563–587.
58. Locatelli, B., Imbach, P., Wunder, S., Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica. Environ. Conserv. 41 (2013), 27–36.
59. Luck, G.W., Harrington, R., Harrison, P.A., Kremen, C., Berry, P.M., Bugter, R., Dawson, T.P., De Bello, F., Díaz, S., Feld, C.K., Haslett, J.R., Hering, D., Kontogianni, A., Lavorel, S., Rounsevell, M., Samways, M.J., Sandin, L., Settele, J., Sykes, M.T., Van Den Hove, S., Vandewalle, M., Zobel, M., Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. BioScience 59 (2009), 223–235.
60. MA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, A Framework for Assessment. 2003, Island Press, Washington, DC.
61. MA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing (Synthesis). 2005, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
62. Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M.B., Alkemade, R., Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 155 (2012), 1–12.
63. Maller, C.J., Promoting children's mental, emotional and social health through contact with nature: a model. Health Educ. 109 (2009), 522–543.
64. McPherson, E.G., Nowak, D., Heisler, G., Grimmond, S., Souch, C., Grant, R., Rowntree, R., Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago urban forest climate project. Urban Ecosyst. 1 (1997), 49–61.
65. Moore, S.R., Energy efficiency in small-scale biointensive organic onion production in Pennsylvania, USA. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 25 (2010), 181–188.
66. Niemelä, J., Ecology of urban green spaces: the way forward in answering major research questions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 125 (2014), 298–303.
67. Niemelä, J., Saarela, S.-R., Söderman, T., Kopperoinen, L., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Väre, S., Kotze, D.J., Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodivers. Conserv. 19:11 (2010), 3225–3243.
68. Oberndorfer, E., Lundholm, J., Bass, B., Coffman, R.R., Doshi, H., Dunnett, N., Gaffin, S., Köhler, M., Liu, K.Y., Rowe, B., Green roofs as urban ecosystems: ecological structures, functions, and services. BioScience 57 (2007), 823–833.
69. Pedersen Zari, M., Ecosystem processes for biomimetic architectural and urban design. Archit. Sci. Rev. 58 (2015), 106–119.
70. Pelzer, P., Geertman, S., Planning support systems and interdisciplinary learning. Plan. Theory Pract. 15 (2014), 527–542.
71. Pelzer, P., Geertman, S., van der Heijden, R., Rouwette, E.n., The added value of Planning Support Systems: a practitioner's perspective. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 48 (2014), 16–27.
72. Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E., Bieling, C., Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33 (2013), 118–129.
73. Queiroz, C., Meacham, M., Richter, K., Norström, A.V., Andersson, E., Norberg, J., Peterson, G., Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Ambio 44 (2015), 89–101.
74. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D., Bennett, E.M., Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Soc. U. S. A. 107 (2010), 5242–5247.
75. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F.S. III, Lambin, E., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., Foley, J., Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc., 14, 2009, 32.
76. Rodríguez, J.P., Beard, T.D. Jr., Bennett, E.M., Cumming, G.S., Cork, S.J., Agard, J., Dobson, A.P., Peterson, G.D., Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc., 11, 2006, 28.
77. RUFS, The Regional development plan for the Stockholm region – RUFS, 2010. 2010, Office of Regional Planning, Stockholm.
78. Scalenghe, R., Marsan, F.A., The anthropogenic sealing of soils in urban areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 90 (2009), 1–10.
79. Schipperijn, J., Bentsen, P., Troelsen, J., Toftager, M., Stigsdotter, U.K., Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban For. Urban Green. 12 (2013), 109–116.
80. Schwarz, N., Bauer, A., Haase, D., Assessing climate impacts of planning policies – an estimation for the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Environ. Impact Assess. 31 (2011), 97–111.
81. Seppelt, R., Lautenbach, S., Volk, M., Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5 (2013), 458–463.
82. Shanahan, D.F., Fuller, R.A., Bush, R., Lin, B.B., Gaston, K.J., The health benefits of urban nature: how much do we need?. BioScience 65 (2015), 476–485.
83. Shashua-bar, L., Hoffman, M.E., Vegetation as a climatic component in the design of an urban street: an empirical model for predicting the cooling effect of urban green areas with trees. Energy Build. 31 (2000), 221–235.
84. Stadsbyggnadskontoret, Den Gröna Promenadstaden: En strategi för utveckling av Stockholms parker och natur – Utställningsförslag maj 2013 (Trans.) The Green Walkable City: A Strategy for Developing Stockholm's Parks and Nature – Exhibition May 2013, 2013, The City Planning Administration, City of Stockholm.
85. Stockholm City Council, The Walkable City: Stockholm City Plan. 2010, Stockholm City Council.
86. Stockholms stad, Norra Djurgårdsstaden – Grönytefaktor: Hjorthagen. Stockholm stad. 2013.
87. Strohbach, M.W., Haase, D., Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: analysis of patterns in a European city. Landsc. Urban Plan. 104 (2012), 95–104.
88. Syrbe, R.-U., Walz, U., Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 21 (2012), 80–88.
89. Tallis, M., Taylor, G., Sinnett, D., Freer-Smith, P., Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 103 (2011), 129–138.
90. Taylor Lovell, S., Johnston, D.M., Designing landscapes for performance based on emerging principles in landscape ecology. Ecol. Soc., 14, 2009, 44.
91. Te Brömmelstroet, M., Schrijnen, P.M., From planning support systems to mediated planning support: a structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environ. Plan. B 37 (2010), 3–20.
92. TEEB, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: An Interim Report. 2008, European Commission, Brussels.
93. TEEB, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. 2011, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
94. TEEB, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, TEEB Manual for Cities: Ecosystem Services in Urban Management. 2011, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
95. Tratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Warren, P.H., Davies, R.G., Gaston, K.J., Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 83 (2007), 308–317.
96. Turner, V.K., Galletti, C.S., Do sustainable urban designs generate more ecosystem services? A case study of Civano in Tucson, Arizona. Prof. Geogr. 67 (2015), 204–217.
97. UN DESA, Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights. 2014, United Nations, New York.
98. Ungaro, F., Zasada, I., Piorr, A., Mapping landscape services, spatial synergies and trade-offs. A case study using variogram models and geostatistical simulations in an agrarian landscape in North-East Germany. Ecol. Indic. 46 (2014), 367–378.
99. Walz, A., Corina, L., Behrendt, H., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lundström, C., Kytzia, S., Bebi, P., Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling. Landsc. Urban Plan. 81 (2007), 114–131.
100. Wilkinson, C., Social–ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory. Plan. Theory 11 (2011), 148–169.
101. Wissen Hayek, U., Efthymiou, D., Farooq, B., von Wirth, T., Teich, M., Neuenschwander, N., Grêt-Regamey, A., Quality of urban patterns: spatially explicit evidence for multiple scales. Landsc. Urban Plan. 142 (2015), 47–62.
102. Wolf, K.L., Robbins, A.S.T., Metro nature, environmental health, and economic value. Environ. Health Perspect. 123 (2015), 390–398.