Protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient experiences of central venous access devices in anti-cancer treatment

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Ryan, Caoimhe ^a   Hesselgreaves, Hannah ^b   Wu, Olivia ^a   Paul, Jim ^a   Dixon Hughes, Judith ^a   Moss, Jonathan G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c GARTNAVEL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Central venous access devices; Chemotherapy; Patient experience; Patient perspectives; Protocol; Systematic review; Vascular access

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; EMOTION; HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MENTAL STRESS; MOOD; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING; QUALITY OF LIFE; SENSATION; SOLID MALIGNANT NEOPLASM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VASCULAR ACCESS; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; DEVICES; DRUG THERAPY; INDWELLING CATHETER; NEOPLASM; OUTPATIENT; PERCEPTION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE;

CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; DRUG THERAPY; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; OUTPATIENTS; PERCEPTION; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES;

EID: 85045510611     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0721-x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Robinson-Reilly M, Paliadelis P, Cruickshank M. Venous access: the patient experience. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(3):1181-7.
2. Campbell WB, Elworthy S, Peerlinck I, Vanslembroek K, Bangur R. Sites of implantation for central venous access devices (Ports): a study of the experiences and preferences of patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;644:642-4.
3. Sansivero GE. Features and selection of vascular access devices. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2010;26:88-101.
4. Corriere MA, Avise JA, Peterson LA, Stafford JM, Easterling D, Sr SB, Ip E, Hyde AS, Burke GL. Exploring patient involvement in decision making for vascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:1032-1039.e2.
5. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123:A12-3.
6. Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO. Qual Health Res. 2012;22:1435-43.
7. Kulkarni S, Wu O, Kasthuri R, Moss JG. Centrally inserted external catheters and totally implantable ports for the delivery of chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of device-related complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37:990-1008.
8. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group TP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
9. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45.
10. Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, O'Cathain A, Griffiths F, Boardman F, Gagnon MP, Rousseau MC: Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. 2011. [ http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com ].
11. Marcy PY, Mari V, Figl A, Ben-Taarit I, Fouché Y, Peyrade F, Follana P, Michel C, Chamorey E, Marcy PY. Patient satisfaction with and acceptance of their totally-implanted central venous catheter: construction and first validation of a questionnaire. J Cancer Ther. 2014;5:706-16.
12. Burbridge B, Goyal K. Quality-of-life assessment: arm TIVAD versus chest TIVAD. J Vasc Access. 2016;17:527-34.
13. Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Gerhardus A, Wahlster P, Van Der Wilt GJ, Mozygemba K, Refolo P, Sacchini D, Tummers M, Rehfuess E: Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions. 2016. [ http://www.integrate-hta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Guidance-on-the-integrated-integratedassessment-of-complex-health-technologies-the-INTEGRATE-HTA-model.pdf ].
14. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick and London: Aldine Pub. Co; 1967.
15. Strauss A, Corbin C. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publicatins Ltd; 1998.
16. Finfgeld-Connett D. Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Qual Res. 2014;14:341-52.
17. Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Carlsen B, Colvin CJ, Gülmezoglu M, Noyes J, Booth A, Garside R, Rashidian A. Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLoS Med. 2015;12(10):e1001895.