Quality-of-life assessment: Arm TIVAD versus chest TIVAD

Journal of Vascular Access

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 527-534

  Burbridge, Brent ^a   Goyal, Kunal ^b  

^a ROYAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b REGINA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arm implantation; Chest implantation; Quality of life; TIVADs

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM TOTALLY IMPLANTED VENOUS ACCESS DEVICE; ARTICLE; CHEST TOTALLY IMPLANTED VENOUS ACCESS DEVICE; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMPLANT DELIVERY DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; ARM; CATHETERIZATION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NEOPLASMS; QUALITY OF LIFE; THORAX; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE; VASCULARIZATION;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; ARM; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; THORAX; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES;

EID: 84994496438     PISSN: 11297298     EISSN: 17246032     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000609     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Afsar B, Elsurer R, Covic A, Kanbay M. Vascular access type, health-related quality of life, and depression in hemodialysis patients: a preliminary report. J Vasc Access. 2012;13(2): 215-220.
2. Marcy P, Mari V, Figl A, et al. Patient satisfaction with and acceptance of their totally-implanted central venous catheter: construction and first validation of a questionnaire. Journal of Cancer Therapy. 2014;5(07):706-716.
3. Funaki B, Szymski GX, Hackworth CA, et al. Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(5):1431-1434.
4. Burbridge B. Pictorial essay: arm implantation of the Cook, vital-port mini titanium. Vascular Access. 2013;7(2):11-16. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269396513_ Pictorial_Essay_Arm_Implantation_of_the_Cook_Vital_Port_-_ Mini_Titanium. Accessed August 7, 2016.
5. Dariushnia SR, Wallace MJ, Siddiqi NH, et al; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(7):976-981.
6. Burbridge B, Stoneham G, Szkup P, Otani R, Kriegler S. Catheter fracture and embolization associated with arm implantation of the cook vital port. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013;64(3):269-273.
7. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(12): 2053-2058.
8. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;327(7411):361-367.
9. Calvert N, Hind D, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Beverley CA, Thomas SM. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness. Anaesthesia. 2004; 59(11):1116-1120.
10. Lilienberg A, Bengtsson M, Starkhammar H. Implantable devices for venous access: nurses’ and patients’ evaluation of three different port systems. J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(1):21-28.