Features and Selection of Vascular Access Devices

Seminars in Oncology Nursing

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 88-101

  Sansivero, Gail Egan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

assessment; power injection; Vascular access device; venous anatomy and physiology

Indexed keywords

AGE; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CATHETERIZATION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; COMORBIDITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; INSTRUMENTATION; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; ONCOLOGY NURSING; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SAFETY; VEIN;

AGE FACTORS; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; COMORBIDITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING ASSESSMENT; ONCOLOGIC NURSING; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; SAFETY; VEINS;

EID: 77953161818     PISSN: 07492081     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2010.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Dearborn P., DeMuth J.S., Requarth A.B., et al. Nurse and patient satisfaction with three types of venous access devices. Oncol Nurs Forum 24 (1997) 34-40
2. Chernecky C. Satisfaction versus dissatisfaction with venous access devices in outpatient oncology: a pilot study. Oncol Nurs Forum 28 (2001) 1613-1616
3. Johansson E., Engervall P., Bjorvell H., et al. Patients' perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system-results from a randomized study in acute leukaemia. Support Care Cancer 17 (2009) 137-143
4. Posa P.J., Harrison D., and Vollman K.M. Elimination of Central line-associated blood stream infections: application of the evidence. AACN Adv Crit Care 17 (2006) 446-454
5. Maki D.G., Kluger D.M., and Crnich C.J. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 81 (2006) 1159-1171
6. vandeWetering M.D., vanWoensel J.B., Kremer L.C., et al. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing early gram positive central venous catheter infections in oncology patients: a Cochrane systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 31 (2005) 186-196
7. Pettit J. Technological advances for PICC placement and management. Adv Neonatal Care 7 (2007) 122-131
8. Macklin D., and Chernecky C. IV Therapy (2004), Elsevier, St. Louis, MO
9. Hadaway L.C. Anatomy and physiology related to intravenous therapy. In: Terry J., Barnowski L., Onsway R.A., and Hedrick C. (Eds). Intravenous therapy: clinical principles and practice (1995), Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 81-110
10. Forauer A.R., and Theoharis C. Histologic changes in the human vein wall adjacent to indwelling central venous catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 (2003) 1163-1168
11. Vesely T.M. Central venous catheter tip location: a continuing controversy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 (2003) 527-534
12. Steiger E. HPEN Working Group. Consensus statements regarding optimal management of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) access. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 30 Suppl (2006) S94-S95
13. Aslamy Z., Dewald C.L., and Heffner J.E. MRI of central venous anatomy: implications for central venous catheter insertion. Chest 114 (1998) 820-826
14. Baskin K.M., Jimenez R.M., Cahill A.M., et al. Cavoatrial junction and central venous anatomy: implications for central venous access tip position. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19 (2008) 359-365
15. Mahlon M.A., and Yoon H.C. CT angiography of the superior vena cava: normative values and implications for central venous catheter position. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18 (2007) 1106-1110
16. DeChicco R., Seidner D.L., Brun C., et al. Tip position of long-term central venous access devices used for parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 31 (2007) 382-387
17. Caers J., Fontaine C., Vinh-Hung V., et al. Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports. Support Care Cancer 13 (2005) 325-331
18. Chaturvedi A., Bithal P.K., Dash H., et al. Catheter malplacement during central venous cannulation through arm veins in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 15 (2003) 170-175
19. Pittiruti M., Scoppettuolo G., LaGreca A., et al. The EKG method for positioning the tips of PICCs: results from two preliminary studies. J Assoc Vascular Access 13 (2008) 179-186
20. Schummer W., Schummer C., Muller A., et al. ECG-guided central venous catheter positioning: does it detect the pericardial reflection rather than the right atrium?. Eur J Anaesthesiol 21 (2004) 600-605
21. Maki D.G., Kluger D.M., and Crnich C.J. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 81 (2006) 1159-1171
22. Kawamura J., Nagayama S., Nomura A., et al. Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 13 (2008) 349-354
23. Bodnar L.J., Nosher J.L., Patel K.M., et al. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23 (2000) 187-193
24. Zawacki W.J., Walker G., DeVasher E., et al. Wound dehiscence or failure to heal following venous access port placement in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20 (2009) 624-627
25. Almhanna K., Pelley R.J., Budd G.T., et al. Subcutaneous implantable venous access device erosion through the skin in patients treated with anti-vascula endothelial growth factor therapy. A case series. Anticancer Drugs 19 (2008) 217-219
26. Weeks S.M. Unconventional venous access. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5 (2002) 114-120
27. Federle M.P., Chang P.J., Confer S., et al. Frequency and effects of extravasation of ionic and non-ionic contrast media during rapid bolus injection. Radiology 206 (1998) 637-640
28. Angle J.F., Matsumoto A.H., Skaleak T.C., et al. Flow characteristics of peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8 (1997) 569-577
29. Williamson E.E., and Mckinney J.M. Assessing the adequacy of peripherally inserted central catheters for power injection of intravenous contrast agents for CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25 (2001) 932-937
30. Salis A.I., Exlavea A., Johnson M.S., et al. Maximal flow rates possible during power injection through currently available PICCs: an in vitro study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15 (2004) 275-281
31. Ruess L., Bulas D.I., Rivera O., et al. In-line pressures generated in small-bore central venous catheters during power injection of CT contrast media. Radiology 203 (1997) 625-629
32. Rigsby C.K., Gasher R., Seshadri R., et al. Safety and efficacy of pressure-limited power injection of iodinated contrast medium through central lines in children. Am J Roentgenol 188 (2007) 726-732
33. Donnelly L.F., Dickerson J., and Racadio J.M. Is hand injection of central venous catheters for contrast-enhanced CT safe in children?. Am J Radiol 189 (2007) 1530-1532