Retraction notice to Diagnosis of Microvascular Angina Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: J Am Coll Cardiol 71 (2018) 969-979 (Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2018) 71(9) (969–979), (S073510971830007X), (10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.046));Diagnosis of Microvascular Angina Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 71, Issue 9, 2018, Pages 969-979

  Liu, Alexander ^a   Wijesurendra, Rohan S ^a   Liu, Joanna M ^a   Forfar, John C ^b   Channon, Keith M ^a   Jerosch Herold, Michael ^c   Piechnik, Stefan K ^a   Neubauer, Stefan ^a   Kharbanda, Rajesh K ^a   Ferreira, Vanessa M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

cardiac magnetic resonance; index of microcirculatory resistance; inducible ischemia; microvascular dysfunction; myocardial perfusion reserve index

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; INDEX OF MICROCIRCULATORY RESISTANCE; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYNDROME X; CINE MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MICROCIRCULATION; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; MICROVASCULAR ANGINA; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 85044534665     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.039     Document Type: Erratum

References (32)

1. Patel, M.R., Peterson, E.D., Dai, D., et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 362 (2010), 886–895.
2. Hoffmann, U., Ferencik, M., Udelson, J.E., et al. Prognostic value of noninvasive cardiovascular testing in patients with stable chest pain: insights from the PROMISE trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation 135 (2017), 2320–2332.
3. Camici, P.G., Crea, F., Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 356 (2007), 830–840.
4. Bairey Merz, C.N., Pepine, C.J., Walsh, M.N., Fleg, J.L., Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): developing evidence-based therapies and research agenda for the next decade. Circulation 135 (2017), 1075–1092.
5. De Bruyne, B., Fearon, W.F., Pijls, N.H., et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 371 (2014), 1208–1217.
6. Fearon, W.F., Balsam, L.B., Farouque, H.M., et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 107 (2003), 3129–3132.
7. Fearon, W.F., Low, A.F., Yong, A.S., et al. Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 127 (2013), 2436–2441.
8. Carrick, D., Haig, C., Ahmed, N., et al. Comparative prognostic utility of indices of microvascular function alone or in combination in patients with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 134 (2016), 1833–1847.
9. Lee, J.M., Layland, J., Jung, J.H., et al. Integrated physiologic assessment of ischemic heart disease in real-world practice using index of microcirculatory resistance and fractional flow reserve: insights from the International Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 8, 2015, e002857.
10. Luo, C., Long, M., Hu, X., et al. Thermodilution-derived coronary microvascular resistance and flow reserve in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7 (2014), 43–48.
11. Lee, J.M., Jung, J.H., Hwang, D., et al. Coronary flow reserve and microcirculatory resistance in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 67 (2016), 1158–1169.
12. Marinescu, M.A., Loffler, A.I., Ouellette, M., Smith, L., Kramer, C.M., Bourque, J.M., Coronary microvascular dysfunction, microvascular angina, and treatment strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 8 (2015), 210–220.
13. Lockie, T., Ishida, M., Perera, D., et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 57 (2011), 70–75.
14. Greenwood, J.P., Maredia, N., Younger, J.F., et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 379 (2012), 453–460.
15. Panting, J.R., Gatehouse, P.D., Yang, G.Z., et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 346 (2002), 1948–1953.
16. Lanza, G.A., Buffon, A., Sestito, A., et al. Relation between stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects on cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with cardiac syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol 51 (2008), 466–472.
17. Thomson, L.E., Wei, J., Agarwal, M., et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 8, 2015.
18. Karamitsos, T.D., Arnold, J.R., Pegg, T.J., et al. Patients with syndrome X have normal transmural myocardial perfusion and oxygenation: a 3-T cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5 (2012), 194–200.
19. Liu, A., Wijesurendra, R.S., Francis, J.M., et al. Adenosine stress and rest T1 mapping can differentiate between ischemic, infarcted, remote, and normal myocardium without the need for gadolinium contrast agents. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 9 (2016), 27–36.
20. Liu, A., Wijesurendra, R.S., Ariga, R., et al. Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance, 19, 2017, 1.
21. Cuculi, F., De Maria, G.L., Meier, P., et al. Impact of microvascular obstruction on the assessment of coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and fractional flow reserve after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 64 (2014), 1894–1904.
22. Cuculi, F., Dall'armellina, E., Manlhiot, C., et al. Early change in invasive measures of microvascular function can predict myocardial recovery following PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 35 (2014), 1971–1980.
23. Yong, A.S., Layland, J., Fearon, W.F., et al. Calculation of the index of microcirculatory resistance without coronary wedge pressure measurement in the presence of epicardial stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 6 (2013), 53–58.
24. Ferreira, V.M., Marcelino, M., Piechnik, S.K., et al. Pheochromocytoma is characterized by catecholamine-mediated myocarditis, focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis, and myocardial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 67 (2016), 2364–2374.
25. Jerosch-Herold, M., Swingen, C., Seethamraju, R.T., Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution. Medical Physics 29 (2002), 886–897.
26. Cerqueira, M.D., Weissman, N.J., Dilsizian, V., et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105 (2002), 539–542.
27. Kerry, S.M., Bland, J.M., The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation. BMJ, 316, 1998, 1455.
28. Lee, B.K., Lim, H.S., Fearon, W.F., et al. Invasive evaluation of patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation 131 (2015), 1054–1060.
29. Nagel, E., Klein, C., Paetsch, I., et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 108 (2003), 432–437.
30. Arnold, J.R., Karamitsos, T.D., Bhamra-Ariza, P., et al. Myocardial oxygenation in coronary artery disease: insights from blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 59 (2012), 1954–1964.
31. Pilz, G., Eierle, S., Heer, T., et al. Negative predictive value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac MRI in the assessment of coronary artery disease and correlation with semiquantitative perfusion analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 32 (2010), 615–621.
32. Rider, O.J., Tyler, D.J., Clinical implications of cardiac hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance, 15, 2013, 93.