Negative predictive value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac MRI in the assessment of coronary artery disease and correlation with semiquantitative perfusion analysis

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 615-621

  Pilz, Guenter ^a   Eierle, Susanne ^a   Heer, Tobias ^a   Klos, Markus ^a   Ali, Eman ^a   Scheck, Roland ^a   Wild, Michael ^a   Bernhardt, Peter ^a,b   Hoefling, Berthold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adenosine stress; Cardiac MRI; Coronary artery disease; Negative predictive value; Semiquantitative perfusion analysis

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADENOSINE; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77956302257     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22289     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur MR, Carlos RC. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease - a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1343-1353. (Pubitemid 47449733)
2. Morise AP, Jalisi F. Evaluation of pretest and exercise test scores to assess all-cause mortality in unselected patients presenting for exercise testing with symptoms of suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:842-850. (Pubitemid 37059742)
3. Pilz G, Klos M, Ali E, Höfling B, Scheck R, Bernhardt P. Angiographic correlations of patients with small vessel disease diagnosed by adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:8.
4. Scanion PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 1999;99:2345-2357.
5. Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1657-1665. (Pubitemid 39209287)
6. Plein S, Greenwood JP, Ridgway JP, Cranny G, Ball SG, Sivananthan MU. Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2173-2181. (Pubitemid 39576037)
7. Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ, et al. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1630-1638.
8. Cury RC, Cattani CAM, Gabure LAG, et al. Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion and delayed-enhancement MR imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 2006;240:39-45. (Pubitemid 43902593)
9. Bruder O, Schneider S, Nothnagel D, et al. EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) Registry. Results of the German pilot phase. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1457-1466.
10. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE. Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:171-185. (Pubitemid 38949912)
11. Bernhardt P, Spiess J, Levenson B, et al. Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: a multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 2009;2:1292-1300.
12. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007;115:1769-1776. (Pubitemid 46648614)
13. Pilz G, Jeske A, Klos M, et al. Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:1408-1412.
14. Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS, et al. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1427-1432.
15. Pilz G, Bernhardt P, Klos M, Ali E, Wild M, Höfling B. Clinical implication of adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as potential gatekeeper prior to invasive examination in patients with AHA/ACC class II indication for coronary angiography. Clin Res Cardiol 2006;95:531-538. (Pubitemid 44496717)
16. Madsen J, Bech J, Jørgensen E, Kastrup J, Kelbæk H, Saunamäki K. Yield of 5,536 diagnostic coronary arteriographies: results from a data registry. Cardiology 2002;98:191-194. (Pubitemid 36091856)
17. Zeymer U, Zahn R, Hochadel M, et al. Indications and complications of invasive diagnostic procedures and percutaneous coronary interventions in the year 2003. Results of the quality control registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Z Kardiol 2005;94:392-398.
18. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 2010;362:886-895.
19. Høilund-Carlsen P, Johansen A, Christensen H, et al. Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: observational study without post-test referral bias. Eur Heart J 2006;27:29-34. (Pubitemid 41785929)
20. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:173-174. (Pubitemid 43139230)
21. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease. Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724-1732.
22. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2324-2336.
23. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009;361:849-857.
24. Lauer MS. Elements of danger - the case of medical imaging. N Engl J Med 2009;361:841-843.
25. Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Schreiber K, et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:864-870. (Pubitemid 34185336)
26. Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2002;27:1465-1471.
27. Futamatsu H, Wilke N, Klassen C, et al. Evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters to detect anatomically and hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2007;154:298-305. (Pubitemid 47069133)