Classroom assessment and pedagogy

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 551-575

  Black, Paul ^a   Wiliam, Dylan ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

assessment for learning; Formative assessment; instruction; pedagogy; summative assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044371471     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Alexander, R., (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Alexander, R., (2004). Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in primary education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 7–33.10.1080/0305764042000183106
3. Alexander, R., (2008). Essays on pedagogy. London: Routledge.
4. Allal, L., (1988). Vers un élargissement de la pédagogie de maîtrise: Processus de régulation interactive, rétroactive et proactive. In M., Huberman (Ed.), Maîtriser les processus d’apprentissage: Fondements et perspectives de la pédagogie de maîtrise (pp. 86–126). Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.
5. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A., (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730.10.3102/00028312040003685
6. Assessment Reform Group (2006). The role of teachers in the assessment of learning. London: University of London Institute of Education.
7. Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Kutnick, P., (2009). Promoting effective group work in the primary classroom. London: Routledge.
8. Bennett, R. E., (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5–25.10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
9. Berliner, D. C., (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. N., Mangieri & C. C., Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 161–186). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
10. Bernstein, B., (1990). Class, codes and control volume IV: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203011263
11. Black, P., (2016). The role of assessment in pedagogy–and why validity matters. In D., Wyse, L., Hayward, & J., Pandya (Eds.), Sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, Vol. 2 (pp. 725–739). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Black, P., & Atkin, M., (2014). The central role of assessment in pedagogy. In N. G., Lederman & S. K., Abell (eds.) Handbook on research in science education volume II (Ch. 38, pp. 775–790). Abingdon: Routledge.
13. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, M., & Serret, N., (2010). Validity in teachers’ summative assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 215–232.10.1080/09695941003696016
14. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N., (2011). Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 451–469. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.557020
15. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D., (2002). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: King’s College London.
16. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D., (2003). Assessment for learning– putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
17. Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D., (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
18. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (2007). Large-scale assessment systems: Design principles drawn from international comparisons. Measurement, 5(1), 1–53.
19. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
20. Bruner, J., (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York, NY: Norton for Harvard University Press.
21. Cronbach, L. J., (1971). Test validation. In R. L., Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 443–507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
22. Daugherty, R., (2010). Summative assessment: The role of teachers. In P., Peterson, B., Baker, & B., McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 348–391). Oxford: Elsevier.
23. Department for Education. (2010a). How can I use the three-part lesson? London: Author. Retrieved March 2011 from nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/node/85242
24. Dweck, C. S., (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
25. Earl, L. M., (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
26. European Commission Directorate-General for Education and Culture. (2010). Assessment of key competences: Draft background paper for the Belgian Presidency meeting for Directors-General for school education. Brussels: Author.
27. Foley, B., & Goldstein, H., (2011). League tables in the public sector: A review and analysis. London: British Academy Policy Centre.
28. Freire, P., (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M., Bergman, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
29. Gardner, J., (2007). Is teaching a ‘partial’ profession? Make the Grade: Journal of the Chartered Institute of Educational Assessors, 2, 18–21.
30. Guilford, J. P., (1946). New standards for test evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 427–438.10.1177/001316444600600401
31. Hallam, S., & Ireson, J., (1999). Pedagogy in the secondary school. In P., Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (Ch. 4, pp. 68–97). London: Paul Chapman.10.4135/9781446219454
32. Harlen, W., (Ed.). (2004). A systematic review of the evidence of reliability and validity of assessment by teachers used for summative purposes. EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, University of London.
33. Hayward, L., (2015). Assessment is learning: The preposition vanishes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(1), 27–43.10.1080/0969594X.2014.984656
34. Johnson, S., (2011). A focus on teacher assessment reliability in GCSE and GCE. Coventry: Office of Qualifications and Examination Regulation (OFQUAL)
35. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T., (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.10.3102/0013189X09339057
36. Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J., (2013). Scaffolding science talk: The role of teachers’ questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004–2027. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.604684
37. Kingston, N. M., & Nash, B., (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37.10.1111/emip.2011.30.issue-4
38. Kingston, N. M., & Nash, B., (2015). Erratum. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(1), 55.
39. Koretz, D. M., (1998). Large‐scale portfolio assessments in the US: Evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(3), 309–334.10.1080/0969595980050302
40. Leach, J., & Scott, P., (2005). Perspectives on designing and evaluating science teaching. In P., Tomlinson, J., Dockrell, & P., Winne (Eds.), Pedagogy–Teaching for Learning (Ch. XX, pp. 171–187). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
41. Linn, R. L., (1994). Performance assessment: Policy promises and technical measurement standards. Educational Researcher, 23(9), 4–14.10.3102/0013189X023009004
42. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L., (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 37–66.
43. McGuiness, C., (2005). Teaching thinking: Theory and practice. In P., Tomlinson, J., Dockrell, & P., Winne (Eds.), Pedagogy–Teaching for learning (pp. 107–126). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
44. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C., (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377.10.1080/01411920410001689689
45. Messick, S., (1989). Validity. In R. L., Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). Washington, DC: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
46. Mislevy, R. J., & Riconscente, M. M., (2005). Evidence-centered assessment design: Layers, structures, and terminology. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
47. Moore, A., (2000). Teaching and learning: Pedagogy, curriculum and learning. London: Routledge-Falmer.
48. Mortimore, P., (Ed.). (1999). Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London: Paul Chapman.
49. National Centre for Excellence in Teaching Mathematics. (2007). Was there ever any point to the three-part lesson? London: Author. Retrieved March 2011 from https://www.ncetm.org.uk/blogs/2401
50. New South Wales Board of Studies, Teaching and Educational Standards. (2012). Assessment for, of and as learning. Retrieved July 1, 2016, from https://syllabus.bostes.nsw.edu.au/support-materials/assessment-for-as-and-of-learning/
51. Newton, P., (2012). Clarifying the consensus definition of validity. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 10, 1–29.
52. Nuthall, G., (2007). The hidden lives of learners. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
53. Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C., (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of learning and teaching in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
54. Perrenoud, P., (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 85–102.10.1080/0969595980050105
55. Popham, W. J., (2005). Personal communication with Dylan Wiliam Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
56. Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency (2009). Changes to GCSEs and the introduction of controlled assessment for GCSEs. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency.
57. Sadler, D. R., (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.10.1007/BF00117714
58. Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., Leeman, J., & Crandell, J. L., (2011). Mapping the mixed methods–mixed research synthesis terrain. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 317–331. doi:10.1177/1558689811427913
59. Schum, D. A., (1987). Evidence and inference for the intelligence analyst (Vol. 1). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
60. Shulman, L. S., (1999). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. In J., Leach & B., Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy (Ch. 5, pp. 61–71). London: Chapman.
61. Shulman, L. S., (2005, 6–8 February). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. Paper presented at the Teacher Education for Effective Teaching and Learning, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.taylorprograms.com/images/Shulman_Signature_Pedagogies.pdf
62. Simon, B., (1981). Why no pedagogy in England? In B., Simon & W., Taylor (Eds.), Education in the eighties: The central issues (pp. 124–145). London: Batsford.
63. Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. M., (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement. In W. M., Reynolds & G. J., Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology volume 7: Educational psychology (pp. 177–198). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
64. Smith, F., Hardman, F., Wall, K., & Mroz, M., (2004). Interactive whole class teaching in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 395–411.10.1080/01411920410001689706
65. Stanley, G., MacCann, R., Gardner, J., Reynolds, L., & Wild, I., (2009). Review of teacher assessment: Evidence of what works best and issues for development. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.
66. Stenhouse, L., (1985). Research as a basis for teaching. London: Heinemann.
67. Stiggins, R. J., (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.
68. Stiggins, R. J., Arter, J. A., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S., (2004). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right–using it well. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute.
69. Taba, H., (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
70. TeacherNet. (2010). Useful lesson plans. Teaching Resources. Retrieved September 28, 2016, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080520150154/http://teachernet.gov.uk/teachingandlearning/resourcematerials/resources/
71. Tyler, R. W., (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72. Watkins, P., & Mortimore, P., (1999). Pedagogy: What do we know? In P., Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (Ch. 1, pp. 1–19). London: Paul Chapman.
73. Wiliam, D., (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K., Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053–1098). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
74. Wiliam, D., (2010). What counts as evidence of educational achievement? The role of constructs in the pursuit of equity in assessment. In A., Luke, J., Green, & G., Kelly (Eds.), What counts as evidence in educational settings? Rethinking equity, diversity and reform in the 21st century (Vol. 34, pp. 254–284). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
75. Wiliam, D., (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
76. Wiliam, D., (2016). Leadership for teacher learning: Creating a culture where all teachers improve so that all learners succeed. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.
77. Wiliam, D., & Black, P. J., (1996). Meanings and consequences: A basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 537–548.10.1080/0141192960220502
78. Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S., (2015). Embedding formative assessment: Practical techniques for K-12 classrooms. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.
79. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. J., (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 11(1), 49–65.10.1080/0969594042000208994
80. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M., (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A., Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
81. Wiske, M. S., (1999). What is teaching for understanding? Ch. 17. In J., Leach & B., Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 230–246). London: Chapman. Retrieved March, 2011, from www.teachernet.gov.uk/resources/
82. Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., & Gunn, S., (2010). The centrality of teachers’ judgement practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 59–75.10.1080/09695940903565610