The central role of assessment in pedagogy

Handbook of Research on Science Education

Volumn 2, Issue , 2014, Pages 775-790

  Black, Paul ^a   Atkin, J Myron ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954612096     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203097267     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic thinking: Rethinking classroom talk. York, UK: Dialogos.
2. Alexander, R. (2008). Essays in pedagogy. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
3. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40 (3), 685-730.
4. Atkin, J. M. (1980). The government in the classroom. Dædalus, 109 (3), 85-97.
5. Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Kutnick, P. (2009). Promoting effective group work in the primary classroom. London, UK: Routledge.
6. Black, H. D., & Dockrell, W. B. (1984). Criterion-referenced assessment in the classroom. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
7. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, M., & Serret, N. (2010). Validity in teachers' summative assessments. Assessment in Education, 17 (2), 215-232.
8. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, M., & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers' summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education, 18 (4), 451-469.
9. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London, UK: GL Assessment.
10. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21 (1), 5-31.
12. Blatchford, P., Baines, E., Rubie-Davies, C., Bassett, P., & Chowne, A. (2006). The effect of a new approach to group-work on pupil-pupil and teacher-pupil interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 750-765.
13. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton for Harvard University Press.
14. Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation; the effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58 (1), 1-14.
15. Cole, K. C. (2009). Something incredibly wonderful happens: Frank Oppenheimer and the world he made up. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt.
16. Connolly, C., Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2011). Moderation and consistency of teacher judgment: Teachers' views. British Educational Research Journal, 1, 1-22.
17. Dawes, L., Mercer, M., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Thinking together. Birmingham, UK: Imaginative Minds Ltd.
18. Dewey, J. (1985). The later works, 1925-1953, Volume 7: 1932. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
19. Dewey, J. (2012). Unmodern philosophy and modern philosophy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
20. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
21. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
22. Eisner, E. (1978). The educational imagination. New York: Macmillan.
23. Emerson, R. W. (1834). Journal, April 11.
24. Fisher R. (2005). Teaching children to learn (2nd ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Nelson Thornes.
25. Foos, P. W., Mora, J. J., & Tkacz, S. (1994). Student study techniques and the generation effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (4), 567-576.
26. Freire, P. (1983). Banking education. In H. Giroux & D. Purpel (Eds.), The hidden curriculum and moral education: Deception of discovery (p. 284). Berkeley, CA: McCutchen.
27. Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of hope. New York: Continuum.
28. Greene, M. (1983). Introduction. In H. Giroux & D. Purpel (Eds.), The hidden curriculum and moral education: Deception of discovery (pp. 1-5). Berkeley, CA: McCutchen.
29. Groome, T. H. (1998). Educating for life. New York: Crossroad.
30. Gunn, S. J. (2007). Literature review. In C. Wyatt-Smith & G. Masters (Eds.), Proposals for a new model of senior assessment: Realising potentials. Unpublished report prepared for Queensland Studies Authority. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
31. Hallam, S., & Ireson, J. (1999). Pedagogy in the secondary school. In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (pp. 68-97). London, UK: Paul Chapman.
32. Harlen, W. (2013). Assessment and inquiry-based science education. Trieste, Italy: Global Network of Science Academies.
33. Harris, L. H., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). The complexity of teachers' conceptions of assessment: tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education, 16 (3), 363-381.
34. Hawkins, D. (1974). The informed vision: Essays on learning and human nature. New York: Agathon Press.
35. Hawkins, D. (1983). Nature closely observed. Daedalus, 112 (2), 65-89.
36. Hipkins, R., & Robertson, S. (2011). Moderation and teacher learning: What can research tell us about their inter-relationships? Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
37. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Co-operative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Retrieved from www. tablelearning. com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B. pdf.
38. King, A. (1995). Inquiring minds really do want to know-using questioning to teach critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22 (1), 13-17.
39. Koretz, D. (1998). Large scale portfolio assessments in the US: Evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement. Assessment in Education, 5 (3), 309-334.
40. Mansell, W., James, M., & the Assessment Reform Group. (2009). Assessment in schools. Fit for purpose? A commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London, UK: ESRC TLRP, Institute of Education London. Retrieved from www. tlrp. org/pub/commentaries. html.
41. Menand, L. (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
42. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30 (3), 359-377.
43. Milroy, D. (1992). Teaching and learning: What a child expects from a good teacher. In Education: Putting the Record Straight (pp. 57-61). Stafford, UK: Network Educational Press.
44. National Research Council (NRC). (2011). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
45. OECD. (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD indicators. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from www. oecd. org/edu/eag2013%20 %28eng%29--FINAL%2020%20June%202013. pdf.
46. Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2008). Teachers, schools and using evidence: Considerations of preparedness. Assessment in Education, 15 (1), 57-71.
47. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9 (3), 233-265.
48. Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic and fate control. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 81-94.
49. Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13 (2), 191-209.
50. Shapley, K. S., & Bush, M. J. (1999). Developing a valid and reliable portfolio assessment in the primary grades: Building on practical experience. Applied Measurement in Education, 12 (2), 111-132.
51. Shulman, L. S. (1999). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. In M. J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 61-71). London, UK: Chapman.
52. Simon, M. & Forgette-Giroux, R. (2000). Impact of a content selection framework on portfolio assessment at the classroom level. Assessment in Education, 7 (1), 83-101.
53. Stanley, G., McCann, R., Gardner, J., Reynolds, L., & Wild, I. (2009). Review of teacher assessment: What works best and issues for development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Centre for Educational Development-Report commissioned by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
54. Tyler, R. W. (1969). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Webb, D. C. (2009). Designing professional development for assessment. Educational Designer, 1 (2). Retrieved from www. educationaldesigner. org/ed/volume1/issue2/article6/.
56. Wiliam, D., & Black, P. J. (1996). Meanings and consequences: A basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 22 (5), 537-548.
57. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53-82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
59. Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., & Gunn, S. (2010). The centrality of teachers' judgement practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education, 17 (1), 59-75.
60. Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Bridges, S. (2008). Meeting in the middle-assessment, pedagogy, learning and students at educational disadvantage. Evaluation for the Literacy and Numeracy in the Middle Years of Schooling Initiative Strand A. Queensland Government Report. Retrieved from http://education. qld. gov. au/literacy/docs/deewr-myp-final-report. pdf.
61. Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Cumming, J. J. (2003). Curriculum literacies: Expanding domains of assessment. Assessment in Education, 10 (1), 47-59.